Capturing teachers’ experience of learning design through case studies

Distance Education

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 223-238

  Masterman, Elizabeth ^a   Jameson, Jill ^b   Walker, Simon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

case studies; LAMS; learning design; mediating artefacts; Moodle; pedagogic practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957615228     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910903023207     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Agostinho, S. 2008. “ Learning design representations to document, model, and share teaching practice ”. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Edited by: Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. Vol. 1, 1 – 19. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
2. Britain, S. 2004. A review of learning design: Concept, specifications and tools Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ACF83C.doc
3. Conole, G. 2008. “ The role of mediating artefacts in learning design ”. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Edited by: Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. 108 – 208. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
4. Falconer, I. and Littlejohn, A. 2008. “ Representing models of practice ”. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Edited by: Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. 20 – 40. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
5. Ferrell, G. and Kelly, J. Collaborative approaches to the management of e‐learning (CAMEL). Is information technology shaping the future of higher education? Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of European University Information Systems. Estonia. Edited by: Lillemaa, T. pp. 333 – 337. University of Tartu.
6. Griffiths, D. and Liber, O. 2008. “ Opportunities, achievements, and prospects for use of IMS LD ”. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Edited by: Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. 87 – 112. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
7. Jameson, J. The eLIDA CAMEL model of collaborative partnership: A community of practice in design for learning. Proceedings of ICEL 2008, the 3rd International Conference on e‐Learning. South Africa. Edited by: Remenyi, D. pp. 225 – 232. University of Cape Town.
8. Jameson, J., Ferrell, G., Kelly, J., Walker, S. and Ryan, M. 2006. Building trust and shared knowledge in communities of e‐learning practice: Collaborative leadership in the JISC eLISA and CAMEL lifelong learning projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6): 949 – 968.
9. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). 2004. Effective practice with e‐learning: A good practice guide in designing for learning, Bristol: JISC. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/jisc%20effective%20practice3.pdf
10. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). 2006. Background to the JISC Circular 1/06: Design for learning programme (JISC Briefing Document), Bristol: JISC. Retrieved April 3, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/funding/2006/02/backgrounddesignforlearningv3%20final.pdf
11. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). n.d. Template for describing an example of (e)learning, Bristol: JISC. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearningpedagogy/templates
12. Koper, R. 2006. Current research in learning design. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1): 13 – 22.
13. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Laurillard, D. and Masterman, E. in press. “ Online collaborative TPD for learning design ”. In Online learning communities and teacher professional development: Methods for improved education delivery, Edited by: Lindberg, J.O. and Olofsson, A.D. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
15. Masterman, E. 2008. “ Activity theory and the design of pedagogic planning tools ”. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Edited by: Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. 209 – 227. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
16. Masterman, L. and Lee, S. 2005. Evaluation of the practitioner trial of LAMS: Final report Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/LAMS%20Final%20Report.pdf
17. McAndrew, P. and Goodyear, P. 2007. “ Representing practitioner experiences through learning design and patterns ”. In Rethinking pedagogy for the digital age, Edited by: Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. 92 – 102. London: Routledge.
18. Stake, R.E. 2000. “ The case study method in social enquiry ”. In Case study method: Key issues, key texts, Edited by: Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. and Foster, P. 19 – 26. London: Sage. (Original work published 1978.)
19. Walker, S. and Masterman, L. 2006. “ Learning designs and the development of study skills: Reuse and community perspectives ”. In Proceedings of the First International LAMS Conference 2006: Designing the future of learning, Edited by: Philip, R., Voerman, A. and Dalziel, J. 89 – 98. Sydney: LAMS Foundation. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://lamsfoundation.org/lams2006/refereedpapers.htm