Representing practice: Practice models, patterns, bundles...

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 101-127

  Falconer, Isobel ^a   Finlay, Janet ^b   Fincher, Sally ^c  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LEEDS METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bundles; Learning design; Patterns; Practice models; Representations; Teaching practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957604368     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2011.553620     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ADL. 2004. SCORM 2004 4th edition version 1.1 overview. http://www.adlnet.gov/Technologies/scorm/SCORMSDocuments/2004%204th%20Edition/Overview.aspx (accessed February 22, 2010).
2. Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, I. Fiksdahl-King, and S. Angel. 1977. A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Appleton, B. 2000. Patterns and software: Essential concepts and terminology. http://www.cmcrossroads.com/bradapp/docs/patterns-intro.html#RuleOfThree (accessed June 10, 2010).
4. AUTC. 2003. Information and communication technologies and their role in flexible learning. http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/index.html (accessed February 22, 2010).
5. Beetham, H. 2001 How do representations of practice enable practice to change? Educational Developments 2, no. 4: 19-22.
6. Beetham, H. 2008. Review of the UK JISC design for learning programme. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/helenbeethamreviewphase2.doc (accessed February 22, 2010).
7. Beetham, H., and R. Sharpe, eds. 2007. Rethinking pedagogy for the digital age. London: Routledge.
8. Bennett, S., S. Agostinho, and L. Lockyer. 2005. Reusable learning designs in university education. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Education and Technology, ed. T.C. Montgomery and J.R. Parker, 102-106. Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.
9. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2009. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21, no. 1: 5-31.
10. Blumhof, J. 2009. Senior academics' views on Evidence Net. Report to the UK Higher Education Academy, York.
11. Boose, J.H. 1990. Knowledge acquisition tools, methods, and mediating representations. In Proceedings of the First Japanese Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge- Based Systems Workshop: JKAW-90, ed. H. Motoda, R. Mizoguchi, J.H. Boose, and B.R. Gaines. Tokyo: Ohmsha.
12. Conole, G. 2006. Mediating artefacts to guide choice in creating and undertaking learning activities. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Networked Learning 2006, ed. S. Banks, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, B. Kemp, D. McConnell, and C. Smith. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
13. Conole, G., and K. Fill. 2005. A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive Multimedia Education 8. http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2005/08 (accessed February 22, 2010).
14. Currier, S., L. Campbell, and H. Beetham. 2005. JISC pedagogical vocabularies project. Report 1: Pedagogical vocabularies review. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/PedVocab_VocabsReport_v0p11.doc (accessed February 22, 2010).
15. Dalziel, J. 2003. Implementing learning design: The learning activity management system (LAMS). Paper presented at Ascillite Conference, 2003. http://www.lamsinternational.com/documents/ASCILITE2003.Dalziel.Final.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010).
16. Dalziel, J. 2006. The design and development of the LAMS Community. http://www.lamscommunity.org/dotlrn/clubs/educationalcommunity/lamsresearchdevelopment/forums/message-view?message_id=311748 (accessed February 22, 2010).
17. Dearden, A., and Finlay, J. 2006. Pattern languages in HCI: A critical review. Human Computer Interaction 21, no. 1: 49-102.
18. Dron, J. 2007. Control and constraint in e-learning - Choosing when to choose. London: Idea Group.
19. Falconer, I. 2007. Mediating between practitioner and developer communities - The Ladie experience. Association for Learning Technology Journal 15, no. 2: 155-70.
20. Falconer, I. 2009. Planet project evaluation report. http://patternlanguagenetwork.wordpress.com/outcomes/ (accessed May 18, 2010).
21. Falconer, I., H. Beetham, R. Oliver, L. Lockyer, and A. Littlejohn. 2007. Mod4L final report: Representing learning designs. http://mod4l.com/tikidownload_file.php?fileId=7 (accessed February 22, 2010).
22. Falconer, I., G. Conole, A. Littlejohn, and A. Jefferey. 2006. Learning activity reference model - Pedagogy guide. Output of the JISC LADiE project. http://www.elframework.org/refmodels/ladie/guides/LARM_Pedagogy30-03-06.doc (accessed February 22, 2010).
23. Falconer, I., and A. Littlejohn. 2006. Mod4L report on case studies, exemplars and learning designs. http://mod4l.com/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=2 (accessed February 22, 2010).
24. Falconer, I., and A. Littlejohn. 2008. Representing models of practice. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications, and technologies, ed. L. Lockyer, S. Bennet, S. Agostinho, and B. Harper, 20-40. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
25. Fincher, S. 1999. Analysis of design: An exploration of patterns and pattern languages for pedagogy. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 18, no. 3: 331-346.
26. Fincher, S. 2000. From transfer to transformation: Towards a framework for successful dissemination of engineering education. 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference 2: F4F/14-F4F/19.
27. Fincher, S., M. Petre, and M. Clark. 2001. Computer science project work: Principles and pragmatics. London: Springer Verlag.
28. Finlay, J., E. Allgar, A. Dearden, and B. McManus. 2002. Pattern languages in participatory design. In People and Computers XVI Memorable yet Invisible, Proceedings of HCI2002, ed. X. Faulkner, J. Finlay, and F. Detienne, 159-174. London: Springer Verlag.
29. Finlay, J., J. Gray, I. Falconer, J. Hensman, Y. Mor, and S. Warburton. 2009. Planet: Pattern language for Web 2.0 in learning. JISC project final report. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/usersandinnovation/planet%20final%20report.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010).
30. Goodyear, P. 2005. Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 21, no. 1: 82-101. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/goodyear.html (accessed June 10, 2010).
31. Goodyear, P., and D.F. Yang. 2008. Patterns and pattern languages: Supporting understanding and performance in educational design. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, ed. L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, and B. Harper, 167-87. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
32. Greenbaum, J., and M. Kyng, eds. 1991. Design at work. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
33. Griffiths, D., and J. Blat. 2005. The role of teachers in editing and authoring units of learning using IMS learning design. International Journal on Advanced Technology for Learning (ATL) 2, no. 4: 243-51.
34. Hatch, A., L. Burd, C. Ashurst, and A. Jessop. 2007. Project management patterns and the research-teaching nexus. Paper presented at 8th annual conference of the Subject Centre for Information and Computer Science, August 28-30, in University of Southampton, Southampton.
35. Hohmann, L. 1998. Getting started with patterns. Software development magazine, February, http://www.lukehohmann.com/paper-gettingstartedwithpatterns.php (accessed June 10, 2010).
36. IMS. 2003. IMS Learning Design best practice and implementation guide. http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_bestv1p0.html (accessed February 22, 2010).
37. JISC. 2006a. Circular 01/06: Design for learning programme. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/funding/2006/02/circular01_06_designforlearning.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010).
38. JISC. 2006b. Background to the JISC circular 1/06: Design for learning programme. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/funding/2006/02/backgrounddesignforlearningv3%20final.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010).
39. Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
40. Littlejohn, A., and C.A. Pegler. 2007. Planning for blended learning. London: Routledge.
41. Manns, M.L., H. Sharp, P. McLaughlin, and M. Prieto. 1998. Capturing successful practices in OT education and training. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 11, no. 1: 29-34.
42. Masterman, L. 2006. The learning design tools project: An evaluation of generic tools used in design for learning: Project report. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/LD%20Tools%20Report%20v1.1.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010).
43. McAndrew, P., P. Goodyear, and J. Dalziel. 2006. Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology 2: 216-42.
44. Metcalfe, M. 2008. Final report of the designs on learning project. http://confluence.rave.ac.uk/confluence/display/SCIRCDoL/Final+Report (accessed February 22, 2010).
45. Novak, J.D., and A.J. Cañas. 2006. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them, technical report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010).
46. Pachler, N., H. Mellar, C. Daly, Y. Mor, and D. Wiliam. 2009. Scoping a vision for formative e-assessment. JISC project final report. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2009/feasstfinalreport.aspx (accessed February 22, 2010).
47. Pata, K. 2009. Modeling spaces for self-directed learning at university courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12, no. 3: 23-43.
48. Retalis, S., P. Georgiakakis, and Y. Dimitriadis. 2006. Eliciting design patterns for elearning systems. Computer Science Education 16, no. 2: 105-18.
49. Selwyn, N., ed. 2008. Education 2.0? Designing the web for teaching and learning. A Commentary by the technology enhanced learning phase of the ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme. http://www.tlrp.org/tel/files/2008/11/tel_comm_final.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010).
50. Sharpe, R., H. Beetham, and A. Ravenscroft. 2004. Active artifacts: Representing our knowledge of learning and teaching. Educational Developments 5, no. 2: 16-21.
51. Star, S.L. 1989. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Distributed artificial intelligence, ed. L. Gasser and M. Huhns, vol. 2, 37-54. London: Pitman.
52. Tuomi-Grohn, T., and Y. Engestrom, eds. 2003. Between work and school: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. London: Pergamon.
53. Vogel, M., and M. Oliver. 2006. Design for learning in virtual learning environments - Insider perspectives. JISC learning design tools project report. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/D4L_VLE_report_final.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010).
54. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Winters, N., and Y. Mor. 2008. IDR: A participatory methodology for interdisciplinary design in technology enhanced learning. Computers and Education 50: 579-600.