Third harmonics nonlinear susceptibility in supercooled liquids: A comparison to the box model

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 134, Issue 19, 2011, Pages

  Brun, C ^a   Crauste Thibierge, C ^b   Ladieu, F ^a   L'Hote D ^a  

^a CEA SACLAY   (France)

^b CNRS UMR 3299   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-THERMAL; BOX MODELS; DYNAMICAL HETEROGENEITIES; ELECTRICAL POWER; FINITE FREQUENCIES; GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE; HOLE BURNING; INTRINSIC CONTRIBUTION; NONLINEAR FEATURES; NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES; NONRESONANT; PHONON BATHS; POLARISATION; STATIONARY REGIME; STRONG ELECTRIC FIELDS; SUPERCOOLED LIQUIDS; TEMPERATURE INCREASE; THIRD HARMONIC;

CRYOGENIC LIQUIDS; ELECTRIC FIELDS; EXPERIMENTS; GLASS TRANSITION; GLYCEROL; HOLMIUM; SUPERCOOLING;

DIELECTRIC LIQUIDS;

EID: 79957594174     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3591375     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. P. G. Debenedetti and F. H. Stilinger, Nature (London) 410, 259 (2001). 10.1038/35065704 (Pubitemid 32218700)
2. E. Donth, The Glass Transition, Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol. 48 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001).
3. C. A. Angell, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 102, 205 (1988). 10.1016/0022-3093(88) 90133-0
4. M. D. Ediger, C. A. Angell, and S. R. Nagel, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13200 (1996). 10.1021/jp953538d
5. G. Adam and J. H. Gibbs, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 139 (1965). 10.1063/1.1696442
6. P. G. Debenedetti, Metastable Liquids, Concepts and Principles (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1996).
7. R. Bhmer, K. L. Ngai, C. A. Angell, and D. J. Plazek, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4201 (1993). 10.1063/1.466117
8. M. M. Hurley and P. Harowell, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1694 (1995) 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.1694
9. for a review see, e.g., W. Kob, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0212344v1.
10. B. Schiener, R. Bhmer, A. Loidl, and R. V. Chamberlin, Science 274, 752 (1996). 10.1126/science.274.5288.752 (Pubitemid 26398248)
11. U. Tracht, M. Wihelm, A. Heuer, H. Feng, K. Schmidt-Rohr, and H. W. Speiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2727 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2727
12. M. D. Ediger, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51, 99 (2000). 10.1146/annurev. physchem.51.1.99
13. R. Richert, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 R703 (2002). 10.1088/0953-8984/14/23/201 (Pubitemid 34715147)
14. H. Sillescu, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 243, 81 (1999). 10.1016/S0022-3093(98) 00831-X
15. R. Richert, EuroPhys. Lett. 54, 767 (2001). 10.1209/epl/i2001-00320-5
16. K. Duvvuri and R. Richert, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 1356 (2003). 10.1063/1.1529193
17. T. Blochowicz and E. A. Rssler, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 224511 (2005). 10.1063/1.1931647 (Pubitemid 40844901)
18. K. R. Jeffrey, R. Richert, and K. Duvvuri, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 6150 (2003). 10.1063/1.1603730
19. B. Schiener, R. V. Chamberlin, G. Diezemann, and R. Bhmer, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 7746 (1997). 10.1063/1.475089
20. O. Kircher, B. Schiener, and R. Bhmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4520 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4520
21. R. Richert and S. Weinstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 095703 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.095703 (Pubitemid 44335282)
22. S. Weinstein and R. Richert, Phys. Rev. B 75, 064302 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.064302
23. W. Huang and R. Richert, Eur. Phys. J. B 66, 217 (2008). 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00416-2
24. R. Richert and W. Huang, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 356, 787 (2010). 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.08.047
25. R. Richert, Physica A 322, 143 (2003). 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01912-X
26. L.-M. Wang and R. Richert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 185701 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.185701 (Pubitemid 350074465)
27. W. Huang and R. Richert, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 194509 (2009). 10.1063/1.3139519
28. A. Wagner and H. Kliem, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 1043 (1999). 10.1063/1.479295
29. G. Diezemann, EuroPhys. Lett. 53, 604 (2001). 10.1209/epl/i2001-00195-4
30. J.- P. Bouchaud and G. Biroli, Phys. Rev. B 72, 064204 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.064204 (Pubitemid 41506558)
31. M. Tarzia, G. Biroli, A. Lefvre, and J.-P. Bouchaud, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 054501 (2010). 10.1063/1.3290986
32. C. Thibierge, D. LHte, F. Ladieu, and R. Tourbot, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 103905 (2008). 10.1063/1.2960564
33. C. Crauste-Thibierge, C. Brun, F. Ladieu, D. LHte, G. Biroli, and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 165703 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.165703
34. See supplementary material in Ref. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3591375 E-JCPSA6-134-012120.
35. The Debye character of each box holds for neat liquids, see, e.g., Refs., and. In the very specific case of mixtures studied in Ref., it was shown that agreement with NHB experiment demands that the dynamics of each box is a stretched exponential and not a simple exponential.
36. T. Blochowicz, C. Tschirwitz, S. Benkhof, and E. A. Rssler, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 7544 (2003). 10.1063/1.1563247
37. N. O. Birge, Phys. Rev. B 34, 2674 (1986); 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.1631
38. N. O. Birge and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1631 (1985). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.2674
39. Standard (but tedious) thermal calculations taking into account the thermal circuit connecting the electrodes to the metallic experimental cell do show that the approximation made by considering electrodes as a perfect thermostat produce an error smaller, in any case, than 1 for the nonlinear susceptibility. Besides, we also neglect the possible thermal resistance associated with the interface glycerol/electrode: this is supported by the thorough study of Minakov who has showed, for the Glycerol/Macor interface, that such an effect was responsible of only 5 of the temperature increase [A. A. Minakov, S. A. Adamovsky, and C. Schick, Thermochim. Acta 403, 89 (2003)].
40. 2 of the heating, defined just before Eq., but it is in general not valid for computing the dc temperature increase. The difference lies in the fact that, because of the skin effect, the temperature oscillations are efficiently damped in the thick electrodes, while the dc component is not damped at all. The dc heat flux is thus fully transmitted by the electrodes, and the unavoidable insulating piece between the electrode and the experimental cell is responsible for the major part of the dc temperature increase. The only way to get rid of the dc heating is to perform extremely fast experiments, in the spirit of what is made in Ref., so as to measure the sample properties in a time scale much lower than the thermal diffusion time between the sample and the experimental cell.
41. See the comment: R. Pick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 239602 (2010) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.239602
42. and the reply: L.-M. Wang and R. Richert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 239603 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.239603
43. C. Brun, C. Crauste-Thibierge, F. Ladieu, and D. LHte, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 234901 (2010). 10.1063/1.3507252
44. 0, dh because of the interferences effects depicted in Sec..
45. 0, ph.
46. 1, the latter quantity is taken as a constant when solving Eq.. The same approximation was made independently in, e.g., the Appendix of Ref..
47. 2, klin, k, see Eq., we are led to the conclusion that our estimate should, again, be slightly overestimated.
48. 0, tot, k, is exactly the same, in modulus and phase, as the one found by using Eqs..
49. J. L. Déjardin and Y. P. Kalmykov, Phys. Rev. E 61, 1211 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1211
50. 3(, T) better than 1.
51. The values of the temperatures in the calculations were tuned to yield the same values of the relaxation frequencies f as those found in the experiments of Ref.. Hence, the small differences (less than 1K) between the two sets of temperatures for Figs..
52. L. Berthier, G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, L. Cipelletti, D. El Masri, D. LHte, F. Ladieu, and M. Pierno, Science 310, 1797 (2005). 10.1126/science. 1120714 (Pubitemid 41818947)
53. L. Berthier, G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, W. Kob, K. Miyazaki, and D. R. Reichman, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 184503 (2007). 10.1063/1.2721554 (Pubitemid 46745219)
54. C. Dalle-Ferrier, C. Thibierge, C. Alba-Simionesco, L. Berthier, G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, F. Ladieu, D. LHte, and G. Tarjus, Phys. Rev. E 76, 041510 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.041510 (Pubitemid 350023311)
55. 0 following Eq. (18) of Ref..
56. R. Zondervan, F. Kulzer, G. C. G. Berkhout, and M. Orrit, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 12628 (2007). 10.1073/pnas.0610521104 (Pubitemid 47255205)
57. R. Richert, N. Israeloff, C. Alba-Simionesco, F. Ladieu, and D. LHte, Experimental approaches to heterogeneous dynamics. in Dynamical Heterogeneities in Glasses, Colloids and Granular Media, edited by, L. Berthier, L. Cipeletti, G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, and, W. van, Saarloos (Oxford University Press, New York, 2011) (Sec. 6.1).
58. 3 and the measured one is even larger than in Fig., since the calculated phase never coincides with the experimental one, whatever the frequency.