Isolation, phylogeny and evolution of the SymRK gene in the legume genus Lupinus L.

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 49-61

  Mahé, Frédéric ^a   Markova, Dragomira ^b   Pasquet, Rémy ^c   Misset, Marie Thérèse ^a   Aïnouche, Abdelkader ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c INTERNATIONAL CENTRE OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY ICIPE   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Lupinus phylogeny; Molecular evolution; SymRK gene

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FUNGI; LUPINUS;

EID: 79957533275     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Aïnouche A.K., Bayer R.J. Phylogenetic relationships in Lupinus (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) based on Internal Transcribed Spacer sequences (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Am. J. Bot. 1999, 86(4):590-607.
2. Aïnouche A.K., Bayer R.J., Cubas P., Misset M.-Th. Phylogenetic relationships within tribe Genisteae (Papilionaceae) with special reference to the genus Ulex. Advances in Legume Systematics. Part 10. Higher Level Systematics 2003, 239-252. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. B.B. Klitgaard, A. Bruneau (Eds.).
3. Aïnouche A.K., Bayer R.J., Misset M.-Th. Molecular phylogeny, diversification and character evolution in Lupinus (Fabaceae) with special attention to Mediterranean and African lupines. Plant Syst. Evol. 2004, 246(3-4):211-222.
4. Akiyama K., Tanigawa F., Kashihara T., Hayashi H. Lupin pyranoisoflavones inhibiting hyphal development in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Phytochemistry 2010, 71(16):1865-1871.
5. Altschul S.F., Gish W.R., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215(3):403-410.
6. Álvarez I., Wendel J.F. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29(3):417-434.
7. Baum D.A., Yoon H.-S., Oldham R.L. Molecular evolution of the transcription factor LEAFY in Brassicaceae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 37(1):1-14.
8. Bucher M., Wegmüller S., Drissner D. Chasing the structures of small molecules in arbuscular mycorrhizal signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12(4):500-507.
9. Camillo M.F., Pozzobon M.T., Schifino-Witmann M.T. Chromosome numbers in South American Andean species of Lupinus (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 2006, 15(3-4):113-119.
10. Capoen W., Goormachtig S., De Rycke R., Schroeyers K., Holsters M. SrSymRK, a plant receptor essential for symbiosome formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102(29):10369-10374.
11. Chou H.-H., Holmes M.H. DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(12):1093-1104.
12. Conterato I.F., Schifino-Wittmann M.T. New chromosome numbers, meiotic behaviour and pollen fertility in American taxa of Lupinus (Leguminosae): contributions to taxonomic and evolutionary studies. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 150(2):229-240.
13. Cronk Q.C.B. Legume flowers bear fruit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103(13):4801-4802.
14. De Mita S., Santoni S., Hochu I., Ronfort J., Bataillon Th. Molecular evolution and positive selection of the symbiotic gene NORK in Medicago truncatula. J. Mol. Evol. 2006, 62(2):234-244.
15. De Mita S., Santoni S., Ronfort J., Bataillon Th. Adaptive evolution of the symbiotic gene NORK is not correlated with shifts of rhizobial specificity in the genus Medicago. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:210.
16. Doyle J.J., Luckow M.A. The rest of the iceberg. Legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131(3):900-910.
17. Drummond Ch.S. Diversification of Lupinus (Leguminosae) in the western New World: derived evolution of perennial life history and colonization of montane habitats. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 48(2):408-421.
18. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7(1):214.
19. Dunn, D.B., 1984. Cytotaxonomy and distribution of the new world lupin species. In: Proceedings of the Third International Lupin Conference. International Lupin Association, La Rochelle, France, pp. 67-85.
20. Dunn, D.B., Gillett, J.M., 1966. The Lupines of Canada and Alaska. Queen's Printer, Ottawa, Canada, 89 p.
21. Eastwood, R.J., Drummond, Ch.S., Schifino-Wittmann, M.T., Hughes, C.E., 2008. Diversity and evolutionary history of lupins-insights from new phylogenies. In: Palta, J.A., Berger, J.B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference-Lupins for Health and Wealth, Fremantle, Australia, pp. 346-354.
22. Eisen J.A. Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. Genome Res. 1998, 8(3):163-167.
23. Endre G., Kereszt A., Kevei Z., Mihacea S., Kaló P., Kiss G.B. A receptor kinase gene regulating symbiotic nodule development. Nature 2002, 417(6892):962-966.
24. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39(4):783-791.
25. Fernandes A., Queiros M. Contribution à la connaissance cytotaxonomique des spermatophyta du Portugal. Boletim Soc. Broteriana 1978, IV(suppl. 2):79-164.
26. Geurts R., Bisseling T. Rhizobium nod factor perception and signalling. Plant Cell 2002, 14:S239-S249.
27. Gherbi H., Markmann K., Svistoonoff S., Estevan J., Autran D., Giczey G., Auguy F., Péret B., Laplaze L., Franche C., Parniske M., Bogusz D. SymRK defines a common genetic basis for plant root endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia, and Frankia bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105(12):4928-4932.
28. Gladstones J.S. Distribution, origin, taxonomy, history and importance. Lupins as Crop Plants: Biology, Production and Utilization 1998, 1-37. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. J.S. Gladstones, C. Atkins, J. Hamblin (Eds.).
29. Guindon S., Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52(5):696-704.
30. Guindon S., Delsuc F., Dufayard J.-F., Gascuel O. Estimating Maximum Likelihood Phylogenies with phyML. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 537 2009, Humana Press, pp. 113-137 (Chapter 6).
31. Hall, T.A., 1999-2005. BioEdit: A User-friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program. Version 7.0.5. (accessed 14.02.10). http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html.
32. Holsters M. SymRK, an enigmatic receptor guarding and guiding microbial endosymbioses with plant roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105(12):4537-4538.
33. Howieson J.G., Fillery I.R.P., Legocki A., Sikorski M.M., Stepkowski T., Minchin F.R., Dilworth M.J. Nodulation, nitrogen fixation and nitrogen balance. Lupins as Crop Plants: Biology, Production and Utilization 1998, 149-180. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. J.S. Gladstones, C. Atkins, J. Hamblin (Eds.).
34. Huang X., Madan A. CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 1999, 9(9):868-877.
35. Hughes C.E., Eastwood R. Island radiation on a continental scale: exceptional rates of plant diversification after uplift of the Andes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103(27):10334-10339.
36. Jones D.A., Jones J.D.G. The role of leucine-rich repeat proteins in plant defences. Incorporating Advances in Plant Pathology. In: Advances in Botanical Research 1997, vol. 24:89-167. Academic Press.
37. Käss E., Wink M. Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography of Lupinus (Leguminosae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene and ITS 1+2 regions of rDNA. Plant Syst. Evol. 1997, 208(3-4):139-167.
38. Kistner C., Parniske M. Evolution of signal transduction in intracellular symbiosis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7(11):511-518.
39. Kistner C., Winzer T., Pitzschke A., Mulder L., Sato S., Kaneko T., Tabata S., Sandal N., Stougaard J., Webb K.J., Szczyglowski K., Parniske M. Seven Lotus japonicus genes required for transcriptional reprogramming of the root during fungal and bacterial symbiosis. Plant Cell 2005, 17(8):2217-2229.
40. Kobe B., Kajava A.V. The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2001, 11(6):725-732.
41. Kosakovsky Pond S.L., Frost S.D.W. Datamonkey: rapid detection of selective pressure on individual sites of codon alignments. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(10):2531-2533.
42. Lewis G., Schrirer B., Mackinder B., Lock M. Legumes of the World 2005, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom, 592 p.
43. Li S., Chou H.-H. LUCY2: an interactive DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal tool. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(16):2865-2866.
44. Livingstone C.D., Barton G.J. Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993, 9(6):745-756.
45. Maciel H.S., Schifino-Wittmann M.T. First chromosome number determinations in south-eastern South American species of Lupinus L. (Leguminosae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2002, 139(4):395-400.
46. Markmann K., Parniske M. Evolution of root endosymbiosis with bacteria: how novel are nodules?. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14(2):77-86.
47. Markmann K., Giczey G., Parniske M. Functional adaptation of a plant receptor-kinase paved the way for the evolution of intracellular root symbioses with Bacteria. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6(3):e68.
48. Messier W., Stewart C.-B. Episodic adaptive evolution of primate lysozymes. Nature 1997, 385(6612):151-154.
49. Moretti S., Armougom F., Wallace I.M., Higgins D.G., Jongeneel C.V., Notredame C. The M-Coffee web server: a meta-method for computing multiple sequence alignments by combining alternative alignment methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35(suppl. 2):W645-W648.
50. Müller K.F. SeqState-primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Appl. Bioinf. 2005, 4(1):65-69.
51. Müller K.F. Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 38(3):667-676.
52. Oba H., Tawaraya K., Wagatsuma T. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in Lupinus and related genera. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2001, 47(4):685-694.
53. Ohno S. Evolution by Gene Duplication 1970, Springer-Verlag, New York.
54. Oldroyd G.E.D., Downie J.A. Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59:519-546.
55. Pawlowski K., Sprent J.I. Comparison between Actinorhizal and Legume Symbiosis. Biomedical and Life Sciences, vol. 6 2008, Springer, Netherlands, pp. 261-288, Chaper 5.
56. Perret X., Staehelin C., Broughton W.J. Molecular basis of symbiotic promiscuity. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64(1):180-201.
57. Pfeil B.E., Schlueter J.A., Shoemaker R.C., Doyle J.J. Placing paleopolyploidy in relation to taxon divergence: a phylogenetic analysis in Legumes using 39 gene families. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54(3):441-454.
58. Planchuelo A.M. Taxonomic studies of Lupinus in South America. In: Proceedings of the Third International Lupin Conference 1984, International Lupin Association, La Rochelle, France, pp. 39-54.
59. Plitmann U., Pazy B. Cytogeographical distribution of the Old World Lupinus. Webbia 1984, 38:531-539.
60. Poon A.F.Y., Frost S.D.W., Kosakovsky Pond S.L. Detecting Signatures of Selection from DNA Sequences using Datamonkey. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 537 2009, Humana Press, pp. 163-183 (Chapter 8).
61. Posada D. JModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25(7):1253-1256.
62. Posada D. Selection of Models of DNA Evolution with jModelTest. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 537 2009, Humana Press, pp. 93-112 (Chapter 5).
63. Posada, D., Buckley, Th.R., 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53(5), 793-808.
64. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14(9):817-818.
65. Przyborowski J.A., Weeden N.F. RAPD-based assessment of genetic similarity and distance between Lupinus species in section Albus. J. Appl. Genet. 2001, 42(4):425-433.
66. Radutoiu S., Madsen L.H., Madsen E.B., Felle H.H., Umehara Y., Grønlund M., Sato S., Nakamura Y., Tabata S., Sandal N., Stougaard J. Plant recognition of symbiotic bacteria requires two LysM receptorlike kinases. Nature 2003, 425(6958):585-592.
67. Ree R.H., Citerne H.L., Lavin M., Cronk Q.C.B. Heterogeneous selection on LEGCYC paralogs in relation to flower morphology and the phylogeny of Lupinus (Leguminosae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21(2):321-331.
68. Riely B.K., Mun J.-H., Ané J.-M. Unravelling the molecular basis for symbiotic signal transduction in legumes. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 7(3):197-207.
69. Shoemaker R.C., Schlueter J., Doyle J.J. Paleopolyploidy and gene duplication in soybean and other legumes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9(2):104-109.
70. Simmons M.P., Ochoterena H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 2000, 49(2):369-381.
71. Simon M.F., Grether R., de Queiroz L.P., Skema C., Pennington R.T., Hughes C.E. Recent assembly of the Cerrado, a neotropical plant diversity hotspot, by in situ evolution of adaptations to fire. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(48):20359-20364.
72. Small R.L., Ryburn J.A., Cronn R.C., Seelanan T., Wendel J.F. The tortoise and the hare: choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear Adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group. Am. J. Bot. 1998, 85(9):1301-1315.
73. Stepkowski T., Hughes C.E., Law I.J., Markiewicz Ł., Gurda D., Chlebicka A., Moulin L. Diversification of lupin Bradyrhizobium strains: evidence from nodulation gene trees. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73(10):3254-3264.
74. Stracke S., Kistner C., Yoshida S., Mulder L., Sato S., Kaneko T., Tabata S., Sandal N., Stougaard J., Szczyglowski K., Parniske M. A plant receptor-like kinase required for both bacterial and fungal symbiosis. Nature 2002, 417(6892):959-962.
75. Swofford, D.L., 1989-2003. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10. (accessed 14.02.10). http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/.
76. Wallace I.M., O'Sullivan O., Higgins D.G., Notredame C. M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34(6):1692-1699.
77. Wojciechowski M.F., Lavin M., Sanderson M.J. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91(11):1846-1862.
78. Yang Z., Bielawski J.P. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15(12):496-503.
79. Zhang Z., Li J., Zhao X.-Q., Wang J., Wong G.K.-S., Yu J. KaKs_Calculator: calculating Ka and Ks through model selection and model averaging. Genom. Proteom. Bioinf. 2006, 4(4):259-263.
80. Zhu H., Choi H.-K., Cook D.R., Shoemaker R.C. Bridging model and crop legumes through comparative genomics. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137(4):1189-1196.