Exploring subdomain variation in biomedical language

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Lippincott, Thomas ^a   Séaghdha, Diarmuid T ^a   Korhonen, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL DOMAIN; BIOMEDICAL NLP; BIOMEDICAL TEXT; CLUSTERING TECHNIQUES; COMMON SOURCE; DOMAIN LEVELS; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING;

LINGUISTICS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHILD; DATA MINING; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SEMANTICS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CHILD; DATA MINING; HUMANS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 79957526898     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-212     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Biomedical Natural Language Processing Wiki Special Interest Group. 2010, http://www.sigbiomed.org
2. Biber D. Variation Across Speech and Writing 1988, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Hirschman L, Sager N. Automatic information formatting of a medical sublanguage. Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains 1982, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, Kittredge R, Lehrberger J.
4. Sager N, Lyman M, Bucknall C, Nhan N, Tick LJ. Natural language processing and the representation of clinical data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1994, 1(2):142-160. 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236145, 116193, 7719796.
5. Friedman C, Shagina L, Lussier Y, Hripcsak G. Automated encoding of clinical documents based on natural language processing. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004, 11(5):392-402. 10.1197/jamia.M1552, 516246, 15187068.
6. Roberts A, Gaizauskas R, Hepple M, Guo Y. Mining clinical relationships from patient narratives. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 11):S3. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S11-S3, 2638143, 19091026.
7. Biber D, Gray B. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2010, 9:2-20.
8. Verspoor K, Cohen KB, Hunter L. The textual characteristics of traditional and Open Access scientific journals are similar. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:183. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-183, 2714574, 19527520.
9. Friedman C, Kraa P, Rzhetsky A. Two biomedical sublanguages: a description based on the theories of Zellig Harris. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2002, 35(4):222-235. 10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00012-1, 12755517.
10. Allvin H, Carlsson E, Dalianis H, Danielsson-Ojala R, Daudaravicius V, Hassel M, Kokkinakis D, Lundgren-Laine H, Nilsson G, Nytrø T, Salanterä S, Skeppstedt M, Suominen H, Velupillai S. Characteristics and analysis of Finnish and Swedish clinical intensive care nursing narratives. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT-10 2nd Louhi Workshop on Text and Data Mining of Health Documents, Los Angeles, CA 2010,
11. Cohen KB, Palmer M, Hunter L. Nominalization and alternations in biomedical language. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(9):e3158. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003158, 2527518, 18779866.
12. Nguyen NL, Kim JD. Exploring domain differences for the design of a pronoun resolution system for biomedical text. Proceedings of COLING-08, Manchester, UK 2008,
13. Gildea D. Corpus variation and parser performance. Proceedings of EMNLP-01, Pittsburgh, PA 2001,
14. Clark S, Curran JR. Formalism-independent parser evaluation with CCG and DepBank. Proceedings of ACL-07, Prague, Czech Republic 2007,
15. Blitzer J, Drezde M, Pereira F. Biographies, Bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. Proceedings of ACL-07, Prague, Czech Republic 2007,
16. Daumé H, Marcu D. Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2006, 26:101-126.
17. Jiang J, Zhai C. Instance weighting for domain adaptation in NLP. Proceedings of ACL-07, Prague, Czech Republic 2007,
18. Finkel JR, Manning CD. Hierarchical Bayesian domain adaptation. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL-09, Boulder, CO 2009,
19. Rimell L, Clark S. Porting a lexicalized-grammar parser to the biomedical domain. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2009, 42(5):852-865. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.12.004, 19141332.
20. ACL 2010 workshop on Domain Adaptation for NLP. 2010, http://sites.google.com/site/danlp2010/
21. Vincze V, Szarvas G, Farkas R, Móra G, Csirik J. The BioScope corpus: Biomedical texts annotated for uncertainty, negation and their scopes. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 11):S9. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S11-S9, 2638149, 19091032.
22. Colosimo ME, Morgan AA, Yeh AS, Colombe JB, Hirschman L. Data preparation and interannotator agreement: BioCreAtIvE Task 1B. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(Suppl 1):S12. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S12, 1866396, 16351738.
23. Morgan AA, Lu Z, Wang X, Cohen AM, Fluck J, Ruch P, Divoli A, Fundel K, Leaman R, Hakenberg J, Sun C, hui Liu H, Torres R, Krauthammer M, Lau WW, Liu H, Hsu CN, Schuemie M, Cohen KB, Hirschman L. Overview of BioCreative II gene normalization. Genome Biology 2008, 9:S3. 2559987, 18834494.
24. Kim JD, Ohta T, Tateisi Y, Tsujii J. GENIA corpus - a semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(Suppl 1):i180-i182. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1023, 12855455.
25. Kulick S, Bies A, Liberman M, Mandel M, McDonald R, Palmer M, Schein A, Ungar L, Winters S, White P. Integrated annotation for biomedical information extraction. Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL-04 Workshop on Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases, Boston, MA 2004,
26. Pyysalo S, Ginter F, Heimonen J, Björne J, Boberg J, Järvinen J, Salakoski T. BioInfer: A corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:50. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-50, 1808065, 17291334.
27. NIH The Pubmed Central Open Access subset. 2009, NIH., Http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/about/openftlist.html
28. NIH Journal Publishing Tag Set. 2009, NIH., Http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/
29. NIH National Library of Medicine: Journal Subject Terms. 2009, NIH., Http://wwwcf.nlm.nih.gov/serials/journals/index.cfm
30. Yang Y, Pedersen JO. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. Proceedings of ICML-97, Nashville, TN 1997,
31. Brown PF, deSouza PV, Mercer RL, Della Pietra VJ, Lai JC. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics 1992, 18(4):467-479.
32. Klein D, Manning CD. Fast exact inference with a factored model for natural language parsing. Proceedings of NIPS-02, Vancouver, BC 2002,
33. Nivre J, Hall J, Nilsson J, Chanev A, Eryiǧit G, Kübler S, Marinov S, Marsi E. MaltParser: A language-independent system for data-driven dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering 2007, 13(2):95-135.
34. Minnen G, Carroll J, Pearce D. Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering 2001, 7(3):207-223.
35. Miller GA, Beckwith R, Fellbaum C, Gross D, Miller K. Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography 1990, 3(4):235-244.
36. Hockenmaier J. Data and Models for Statistical Parsing with Combinatory Categorial Grammar. PhD thesis 2003, University of Edinburgh.
37. Gildea D, Jurafsky D. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics 2002, 28(3):246-288.
38. Carreras X, Màrquez L. Introduction to the CoNLL-2004 shared task: Semantic role labeling. Proceedings of CoNLL-04, Boston, MA 2004,
39. Sarkar A, Xia F, Joshi A. Some experiments on indicators of parsing complexity for lexicalized grammars. Proceedings of the COLING-00 Workshop on Efficiency in Large-Scale Parsing Systems, Saarbrücken, Germany 2000,
40. Gotti M. Investigating Specialized Discourse 2005, Bern: Peter Lang.
41. Curran J, Clark S, Bos J. Linguistically motivated large-scale NLP with C&C and Boxer. Proceedings of the ACL-07 Demo and Poster Sessions, Prague, Czech Republic 2007,
42. Briscoe T, Carroll J, Watson R. The second release of the RASP system. Proceedings of the COLING-ACL-06 Interactive Presentation Sessions, Sydney, Australia 2006,
43. Lappin S, Leass HJ. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics 1994, 20(4):535-561.
44. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI, Lafferty J. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003, 3:993-1022.
45. McCallum AK. MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. 2002, Http://mallet.cs.umass.edu
46. Ó Séaghdha D. Latent variable models of selectional preference. Proceedings of ACL-10, Uppsala, Sweden 2010,
47. Levin B. English Verb Classes and Alternation: A Preliminary Investigation 1993, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. Kipper K, Korhonen A, Ryant N, Palmer M. A large-scale classification of English verbs. Language Resources and Evaluation 2008, 42:21-40.
49. Grosse I, Bernaola-Galván P, Carpena P, Román-Roldán R, Oliver J, Stanley HE. Analysis of symbolic sequences using the Jensen-Shannon divergence. Physical Review E 2002, 65(4):041905.
50. Grosse I, Bernaola-Galván P, Carpena P, Román-Roldán R, Oliver J, Stanley HE. Analysis of symbolic sequences using the Jensen-Shannon divergence. Phys Rev E 2002, 65(4):041905.
51. Pearson J. Terms in context. Studies in corpus linguistics 1998, Benjamins J., http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=OEOFd2lnNKkC
52. Tibshirani R, Walther G, Hastie T. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 2001, 63(2):411-423.
53. Kilgarriff A. Comparing corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2001, 6:97-133.
54. Teh YW, Jordan MI, Beal MJ, Blei DM. Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2006, 101(476):1566-1581.