Linking expected mobility production to sustainable residential location planning: some evidence from Flanders

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 936-942

  Boussauw, Kobe ^a   Witlox, Frank ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Flanders; Spatial proximity; Sustainable spatial development; Travel behaviour

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; LOCATION DECISION; MOBILITY; MODEL VALIDATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SETTLEMENT PATTERN; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL PLANNING; SUSTAINABILITY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

BELGIUM; FLANDERS;

EID: 79957506515     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Batty M. Spatial entropy. Geographical Analysis 1974, 6:1-31.
2. Boussauw, K., Neutens, T., Witlox, F., in press-a. Relationship between spatial proximity and travel-to-work distance: the effect of the compact city. Regional Studies.
3. Boussauw, K., Derudder B., Witlox, F., in press-b. Measuring spatial separation processes through the minimum commute: the case of Flanders. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 11 (1).
4. Boussauw, K., Neutens, T., Witlox, F., in press-c. Minimum commuting distance as a spatial characteristic in a non-monocentric urban system: the case of Flanders. Papers in Regional Science 90 (1).
5. Boussauw K., Witlox F. Introducing a commute-energy performance index for Flanders. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43(5):580-591.
6. Boussauw, K., Witlox, F., 2010. Excess travel in non-commuting trips: a regional case study. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon.
7. Cervero R. Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey. Transportation Research Part A 1996, 30(5):361-377.
8. Cervero R., Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D 1997, 2(3):199-219.
9. Dodson J., Sipe N. Shocking the suburbs: urban location, homeownership and oil vulnerability in the Australian city. Housing Studies 2008, 23(3):377-401.
10. Echenique M., Hargreaves A., Jin Y., Mitchell G., Namdeo A. London and the Wider South East Regions Case Study 2009, Solutions Project, Cambridge, London, Bristol.
11. Ewing R., Bartholomew K., Winkelman S., Walters J., Chen D. Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change 2008, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
12. Ewing R., Cervero R. Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 2010, 76(3):265-294.
13. Ewing R. Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: a literature review. Environmental and Urban Studies 1994, 21(2):1-15.
14. Giuliano G. The weakening transportation-land use connection. Access 1995, 6(1):3-11.
15. Gordon P., Richardson H.W. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?. Journal of the American Planning Association 1997, 63(1):95-106.
16. Handy S., Cao X., Mokhtarian P. Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D 2005, 10(6):427-444.
17. Handy S., Weston L., Mokhtarian P. Driving by choice or necessity?. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39(2-3):183-203.
18. Horner M.W. Spatial dimensions of urban commuting: a review of major issues and their implications for future geographic research. The Professional Geographer 2004, 56(2):160-173.
19. EA I. World Energy Outlook 2008, International Energy Agency, Paris.
20. Janssens D., Moons E., Nuyts E., Wets G. Onderzoek Verplaatsingsgedrag Vlaanderen 3 (2007-2008) 2009, Universiteit Hasselt, Brussel-Diepenbeek.
21. Maat K., Timmermans H. Influence of land use on tour complexity. Transportation Research Record 2006, 1977:234-241.
22. Mees P. Transport for Suburbia: Beyond the Automobile Age 2010, Earthscan, London.
23. Mindali O., Raveh A., Salomon I. Urban density and energy consumption: a new look at old statistics. Transportation Research Part A 2004, 38(2):143-162.
24. Naess P. Urban structures and travel behaviour. Experiences from empirical research in Norway and Denmark. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2003, 3(2):155-178.
25. Naess P., Sandberg S.L. Workplace location, modal split and energy use for commuting trips. Urban Studies 1996, 33(3):557-580.
26. Nagendra H. Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Applied Geography 2002, 22:175-186.
27. National Geographical Institute of Belgium, 2009. Structuur en codering van de gegevens top10v-gis en top50V-gis. National Geographical Institute of Belgium. http://www.ngi.be/Common/articles/CA_Top10V-GIS_TOP50V-GIS/restruct_doc_nl.htm.
28. Newman P., Kenworthy J. Cities and Automobile Dependence. A Sourcebook 1989, Gower, Aldershot.
29. Newman P., Kenworthy J. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence 1999, Island Press, Washington, DC.
30. Openshaw S., Taylor P. A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. Statistical Methods in the Spatial Sciences 1979, 127-144. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. N. Wrigley (Ed.).
31. Pisarski A.E. Commuting in America III 2006, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
32. Policy Research Centre on Work and Social Economy, 2010. Gewestelijke uitgaande pendel. Policy Research Centre on Work and Social Economy. (retrieved 06.08.10). http://www.steunpuntwse.be/view/nl/18767.
33. Rietveld P., Vickerman R. Transport in regional science: the "death of distance" is premature. Papers in Regional Science 2004, 83(1):229-248.
34. Schafer A. Regularities in travel demand: an international perspective. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 2000, 3(3):1-31.
35. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, University Press, Cambridge, UK.
36. Van Acker, V., Witlox, F., 2011. Commuting trips within tours: How is commuting related to land use? Transportation. doi: doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9309-6.
37. Van Ruijven B., Van Vuuren D.P. Oil and natural gas prices and greenhouse gas emission mitigation. Energy Policy 2009, 37(11):4797-4808.
38. Verhetsel A., Thomas I., Beelen M. Commuting in Belgian metropolitan areas: the power of the Alonso-Muth model. Journal of Transport and Land Use 2010, 2(3):109-131.
39. Wegener, M., 2010. The future of mobility in cities: challenges for urban modelling. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon.
40. Witlox F. Evaluating the reliability of reported distance data in urban travel behaviour analysis. Journal of Transport Geography 2007, 15(3):172-183.
41. Witlox F., Tindemans H. The application of rough sets analysis in activity-based modelling. Opportunities and constraints. Expert Systems with Applications 2004, 27(4):585-592.
42. Witze A. That's oil, folks. Nature 2007, 445(4):14-17.
43. Zwerts E., Nuyts E. Onderzoek Verplaatsingsgedrag Vlaanderen 2000-2001 2004, Ministry of the Flemish Community, Brussels-Diepenbeek.