A graphical method for practical and informative identifiability analyses of physiological models: A case study of insulin kinetics and sensitivity

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 10, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Docherty, Paul D ^a   Chase, J Geoffrey ^a   Lotz, Thomas F ^a   Desaive, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCRETE PHENOMENA; GRAPHICAL METHODS; IDENTIFIABILITY; IDENTIFIABILITY ANALYSIS; IN-SILICO; INSULIN KINETICS; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; INTEGRAL FORMULATIONS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PARAMETER CHANGES; PARAMETER IDENTIFIABILITY; PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES; SAMPLING ERRORS; STRUCTURAL IDENTIFIABILITY; TEST PROTOCOLS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INSULIN; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUMERICAL METHODS; POTENTIAL FLOW;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

GLUCOSE; INSULIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; BLOOD; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY; LIVER; MALE; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE; HUMANS; INSULIN; KIDNEY; LIVER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957483707     PISSN: 1475925X     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-39     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bellu G, Saccomani MP, Audoly S, D'Angio L. DAISY: A new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2007, 88:52-61. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.002, 2888537, 17707944.
2. Bellman R, Åström KJ. On structural identifiability. Mathematical Biosciences 1970, 7:329-339.
3. Pohjanpalo H. System identifiability based on the power series expansion of the solution. Mathematical Biosciences 1978, 41:21-33.
4. Raue A, Kreutz C, Maiwald T, Bachmann J, Schilling M, Klingmüller U, Timmer J. Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1923-1929. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358, 19505944.
5. Schaber J, Klipp E. Model-based inference of biochemical parameters and dynamic properties of microbial signal transduction networks. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2011, 22:109-116. 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.09.014, 20970318.
6. Erichsen L, Agbaje OF, Luzio SD, Owens DR, Hovorka R. Population and individual minimal modeling of the frequently sampled insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test. Metabolism 2004, 53:1349-1354. 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.04.011, 15375793.
7. Pillonetto G, Sparacino G, Magni P, Bellazzi R, Cobelli C. Minimal model S(I) = 0 problem in NIDDM subjects: nonzero Bayesian estimates with credible confidence intervals. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002, 282:E564-573.
8. Quon MJ, Cochran C, Taylor SI, Eastman RC. Non-insulin-mediated glucose disappearance in subjects with IDDM. Discordance between experimental results and minimal model analysis. Diabetes 1994, 43:890-896. 10.2337/diabetes.43.7.890, 8013753.
9. Caumo A, Vicini P, Zachwieja JJ, Avogaro A, Yarasheski K, Bier DM, Cobelli C. Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: insights from a two-compartment model. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:E1171-1193.
10. Bergman RN, Ider YZ, Bowden CR, Cobelli C. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am J Physiol 1979, 236:E667-677.
11. Audoly S, Bellu G, D'Angio L, Saccomani MP, Cobelli C. Global identifiability of nonlinear models of biological systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001, 48:55-65. 10.1109/10.900248, 11235592.
12. Audoly S, D'Angio L, Saccomani MP, Cobelli C. Global identifiability of linear compartmental models: a computer algebra algorythm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998, 45:36-47. 10.1109/10.650350, 9444838.
13. Chin SV, Chappell MJ. Structural identifiability and indistinguishability analyses of the Minimal Model and a Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Clamp model for glucose-insulin dynamics. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2010, Corrected Proof.
14. McDonald C, Dunaif A, Finegood DT. Minimal-model estimates of insulin sensitivity are insensitive to errors in glucose effectiveness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85:2504-2508. 10.1210/jc.85.7.2504, 10902801.
15. Pillonetto G, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. Numerical non-identifiability regions of the minimal model of glucose kinetics: superiority of Bayesian estimation. Math Biosci 2003, 184:53-67. 10.1016/S0025-5564(03)00044-0, 12788233.
16. Cobelli C, Caumo A, Omenetto M. Minimal model SG overestimation and SI underestimation: improved accuracy by a Bayesian two-compartment model. Am J Physiol 1999, 277:E481-488.
17. Denti P, Bertoldo A, Vicini P, Cobelli C. Nonlinear mixed effects to improve glucose minimal model parameter estimation: A simulation study in intensive and sparse sampling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009, 56:2156-2166.
18. Lotz TF, Chase JG, McAuley KA, Shaw GM, Docherty PD, Berkeley JE, Williams SM, Hann CE, Mann JI. Design and clinical pilot testing of the model based Dynamic insulin sensitivity and secretion test (DISST). J diabetes Sci Technol 2010, 4:1195-1201.
19. Lotz T, Chase JG, Lin J, Wong XW, Hann CE, McAuley KA, Andreassen S. Integral-Based Identification of a Physiological Insulin and Glucose Model on Euglycaemic Clamp Trials. 14th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID 2006); March 29-31; Newcastle, Australia. IFAC 2006, 0000:6-pages.
20. Docherty PD, Chase JG, Lotz T, Hann CE, Shaw GM, Berkeley JE, Mann JI, McAuley KA. DISTq: An iterative analysis of glucose data for low-cost real-time and accurate estimation of insulin sensitivity. Open Med Inform J 2009, 3:65-76. 10.2174/1874431100903010065, 2812840, 20148062.
21. Ritt JF. Differential Algebra 1950, Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc.
22. Van Cauter E, Mestrez F, Sturis J, Polonsky KS. Estimation of insulin secretion rates from C- peptide levels. Comparison of individual and standard kinetic parameters for C-peptide clearance. Diabetes 1992, 41:368-377. 10.2337/diabetes.41.3.368, 1551497.
23. Hann CE, Chase JG, Lin J, Lotz T, Doran CV, Shaw GM. Integral-based parameter identification for long-term dynamic verification of a glucose-insulin system model. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2005, 77:259-270. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.10.006, 15721654.
24. Thorsteinsson B. Kinetic models for insulin disappearance from plasma in man. Dan Med Bull 1990, 37:143-153.
25. Lotz T, Chase JG, McAuley KA, Shaw GM, Wong J, Lin J, Le Compte AJ, Hann CE, Mann JI. Monte Carlo analysis of a new model-based method for insulin sensitivity testing. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2008, 89:215-225. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.03.007, 18242418.
26. Sjostrand M, Holmang A, Lonnroth P. Measurement of interstitial insulin in human muscle. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:E151-154.