Population and individual minimal modeling of the frequently sampled insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test

Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1349-1354

  Erichsen, Lars ^a   Agbaje, Olorunsola F ^b   Luzio, Stephen D ^c   Owens, David R ^c   Hovorka, Roman ^b  

^a NOVO NORDISK A S   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; INSULIN;

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO; CAUCASIAN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIRST ORDER CONDITIONAL ESTIMATION WITH INTERACTION METHOD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; ITERATIVE TWO STAGE METHOD; MALE; NONLINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD TWO STAGE METHOD;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; BLOOD GLUCOSE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INSULIN; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; POPULATION; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 4544340510     PISSN: 00260495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bergman R.N., Ider Y.Z., Bowden C.R., et al. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am J Physiol. 236:1979;E667-E677
2. Bergman R.N., Finegood D.T., Ader M. Assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo. Endocr Rev. 6:1985;45-86
3. Hovorka R., Vicini P. Parameter estimation. Carson E.R., Cobelli C. Modelling Methodology for Physiology and Medicine. 2001;107-151 Academic Press, San Diego, CA
4. Pillonetto G., Sparacino G., Magni P., et al. Minimal model S(I)=0 problem in NIDDM subjects Nonzero Bayesian estimates with credible confidence intervals. Am J Physiol. 282:2002;E564-E573
5. Vicini P., Cobelli C. The iterative two-stage population approach to IVGTT minimal modeling Improved precision with reduced sampling. Intravenous glucose tolerance test. Am J Physiol. 280:2001;E179-E186
6. Agbaje O.F., Luzio S.D., Albarrak A.I.S., et al. Bayesian hierarchical approach to estimate insulin sensitivity by minimal model. Clin Sci. 105:2003;551-560
7. De Gaetano A., Mingrone G., Castageneto M. NONMEM improves group parameter estimation for the minimal model of glucose kinetics. Am J Physiol. 271:1996;E932-E937
8. Davidian M., Giltinan D. Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data. 1995;Chapman & Hall, New York, NY
9. Beal S.L., Sheiner L.B. NONMEM User's Guide. 1992;NONMEM Project Group, University of California, San Francisco, CA
10. Steimer J.L., Mallet A., Golmard J.L., et al. Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters Comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. Drug Metab Rev. 15:1984;265-292
11. Schumitzky A. EM algorithms and two stage methods in pharmacokinetic population analysis. D'Argenio D.Z. Advanced Methods of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis. 1995;145-160 Plenum, New York, NY
12. Beal S.L., Sheiner L.B. NONMEM User's Guide. 1992;NONMEM Project Group, University of California, San Francisco, CA
13. Lee P.M. Bayesian Statistics An Introduction. 2002;Edward Arnold, London, UK
14. Gilks W.R., Richardson S., Spiegelhalter D.J. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. 1996;Chapman & Hall, London, UK
15. Lunn D.J., Thomas A., Best N., et al. WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput. 10:2000;325-337
16. Saad M.F., Anderson R.L., Laws A., et al. A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose-tolerance. Diabetes. 43:1994;1114-1121
17. Godsland I.F., Walton C. Maximizing the success rate of minimal model insulin sensitivity measurement in humans The importance of basal glucose levels. Clin Sci. 101:2001;1-9