Minimal model S(G) overestimation and S(I) underestimation: Improved accuracy by a Bayesian two-compartment model

American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

Volumn 277, Issue 3 40-3, 1999, Pages

  Cobelli, Claudio ^a   Caumo, Andrea ^b   Omenetto, Matteo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Glucose clamp technique; Glucose effectiveness; Glucose kinetics; Insulin sensitivity

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; INSULIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPARTMENT MODEL; GLUCOSE CLAMP TECHNIQUE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; INSULIN RESISTANCE; KINETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE;

ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMANS; INSULIN RESISTANCE; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0033194665     PISSN: 01931849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1999.277.3.e481     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Altman, P. G. Practical Statistics for Medical Students. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
2. Avogaro, A., J. D. Bristow, D. M. Bier, C. Cobelli, and G. Toffolo. Stable-label intravenous glucose tolerance test minimal model. Diabetes 38: 1048-1055, 1989.
3. Avogaro, A., G. Toffolo, A. Valerio, and C. Cobelli. Epinephrine exerts opposite effects on peripheral glucose disposal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion: a stable label intravenous glucose tolerance test minimal model study. Diabetes 45: 1373-1378, 1996.
4. Bergman, R. N., D. T. Finegood, and M. Ader. Assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo. Endocrinol. Rev. 6: 45-46, 1985.
5. Bergman, R. N., Y. Z. Ider, C. R. Bowden, and C. Cobelli. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am. J. Physiol. 236 (Endocrinol. Metab. Gastroint. Physiol. 5): E667-E677, 1979.
6. Best, J. D., S. E. Kahn, M. Ader, R. M. Watanabe, T.-C. Ni, and R. N. Bergman. Role of glucose effectiveness in the determination of glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care 9: 1018-1030, 1996.
7. Carson, E. R., C. Cobelli, and L. Finkelstein. The Mathematical Modeling of Metabolic and Endocrine Systems. New York: Wiley, 1983.
8. Caumo, A., and C. Cobelli. Hepatic glucose production during the labeled IVGTT: estimation by deconvolution with a new minimal model. Am. J. Physiol. 264 (Endocrinol. Metab. 27): E829-E841, 1993.
9. Caumo, A., and C. Cobelli; D. T. Finegood. Minimal model estimate of glucose effectiveness: role of the minimal model volume and of the second hidden compartment. Am. J. Physiol. 274 (Endocrinol. Metab. 37): E573-E576, 1998.
10. Caumo, A., P. Vicini, and C. Cobelli. Is the minimal model too minimal? Diabetologia 39: 997-1000, 1996.
11. Caumo, A., P. Vicini, J. J. Zachwieja, A. Avogaro, K. Yarasheski, D. M. Bier, and C. Cobelli. Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: insights from a two-compartment model. Am. J. Physiol. 276 (Endocrinol. Metab. 39): E1171-E1193, 1999.
12. Cobelli, C., F. Bettini, A. Caumo, and M. J. Quon. Overestimation of minimal model glucose effectiveness in presence of insulin response is due to undermodeling. Am. J. Physiol. 275 (Endocrinol. Metab. 38): E1031-E1036, 1998.
13. Cobelli, C., and A. Ruggeri. Optimal design of sampling schedules for studying glucose kinetics with tracers. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Endocrinol. Metab. 20): E444-E450, 1989.
14. Cobelli, C., G. Toffolo, and E. Ferrannini. A model of glucose kinetics and their control by insulin, compartmental and noncompartmental approaches. Math. Biosci. 72: 291-315, 1984.
15. Cobelli, C., P. Vicini, G. Toffolo, and A. Caumo. The hot IVGTT minimal models: simultaneous assessment of disposal indices and endogenous glucose production. In: The Minimal Model Approach and Determinants of Glucose Tolerance, edited by R. N. Bergman and J. Lovejoy. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1997, p. 202-239.
16. D'Argenio, D., and A. Schumitzky. ADAPT II Users Guide: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis Software. Los Angeles, CA: Biomedical Simulations Resource, University of Southern California, 1997.
17. DeFronzo, R. A., J. D. Tobin, and R. Andres. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am. J. Physiol. 253 (Endocrinol. Metab. 16): E595-E602, 1987.
18. Ferrannini, E., D. J. Smith, C. Cobelli, G. Toffolo, A. Pilo, and R. A. DeFronzo. Effect of insulin on the distribution and disposition of glucose in man. J. Clin. Invest. 76: 357-364, 1995.
19. Finegood, D. T., and D. Tzur. Reduced glucose effectiveness associated with reduced insulin release: an artifact of the minimal-model method. Am. J. Physiol. 271 (Endocrinol. Metab. 34): E485-E495, 1996.
20. Hovorka, R., D. J. A. Eckland, D. Halliday, S. Lettis, C. E. Robinson, P. Bannister, M. A. Young, and A. Bye. Constant infusion and bolus injection of stable-label tracer give reproducible and comparable fasting HGO. Am. J. Physiol. 273 (Endocrinol. Metab. 36): E192-E201, 1997.
21. Quon, M. J., C. Cochran, S. I. Taylor, and R. C. Eastman. Non-insulin-mediated glucose disappearance in subjects with IDDM. Discordance between experimental results and minimal model analysis. Diabetes 43: 890-896, 1994.
22. Radziuk, J., K. H. Norwich, and M. Vranic. Experimental validation of measurements of glucose turnover in nonsteady state. Am. J. Physiol. 234 (Endocrinol. Metab. Gastrointest. Physiol. 3): E84-E93, 1978.
23. Saad, M. F., R. L. Anderson, A. Laws, R. M. Watanabe, W. W. Kades, Y. D. Chen, R. E. Sands, D. Pei, P. J. Savage, and R. N. Bergman for the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Diabetes 43: 1114-1121, 1994.
24. Vicini, P., A. Caumo, and C. Cobelli. The hot IVGTT two-compartment minimal model: indexes of glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity. Am. J. Physiol. 273 (Endocrinol. Metab. 36): E1024-E1032, 1997.
25. Walter, E., and L. Pronzato. Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data. Berlin: Springer, 1997.