Air-pulse corneal applanation signal curve parameters for the characterisation of keratoconus

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 793-798

  Mikielewicz, Marek ^a   Kotliar, Konstantin ^b   Barraquer, Rafael I ^a   Michael, Ralph ^a  

^a INSTITUT UNIVERSITARI BARRAQUER   (Spain)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; CROSS LINKING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; KERATOCONUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STAGING; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOCONUS; MALE; PHOTOSENSITIZING AGENTS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 79956353546     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.188300     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, et al. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3026-31. (Pubitemid 351261143)
2. Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1371-5. (Pubitemid 47096684)
3. Roberts C. Biomechanics of INTACS in keratoconus. In: Colin J, Ertan A, eds. Intracorneal Ring Segments and Alternative Treatments for Corneal Ectatic Diseases. Ankara: Kudret Göz Yayinlari, 2007.
4. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156-62. (Pubitemid 40260703)
5. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:39-47.
6. Spoerl E, Terai N, Haustein M, et al. [Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes] [In German]. Ophthalmologe 2009;106:512-20.
7. Del Buey MA, Cristobal JA, Ascaso FJ, et al. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3199-202.
8. Pinero DP, Alio JL, Barraquer RI, et al. Corneal biomechanics, refraction and corneal aberrometry in keratoconus: an integrated study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;51:1948-55.
9. Schweitzer C, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, et al. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;51:2403-10.
10. Saad A, Lteif Y, Azan E, et al. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;51:2912-16.
11. Krumeich JH, Daniel J, Knülle A. Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:456-63. (Pubitemid 30195921)
12. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:620-7. (Pubitemid 36457967)
13. Chen MC, Lee N, Bourla N, et al. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1886-91.
14. Taylor DT, Lee N, Bourla N, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties and IOP measurements by ocular response analyzer (ORA). Acta Opthalmologica 2008;86: (Suppl 243): EVER Abstract 5251.
15. Dauwe C, Touboul D, Roberts CJ, et al. Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1761-7.
16. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1780-5. (Pubitemid 37210617)
17. Vinciguerra P, Albe E, Mahmoud AM, et al. Intra- and postoperative variation in ocular response analyzer parameters in keratoconic eyes after corneal cross-linking. J Refract Surg 2010;26:669-76.
18. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Morad Y, et al. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus? - a pilot study. Cornea 2009;28:498-502.
19. Fournie P, Galiacy S, Arne JL, et al. [Corneal collagen cross-linking with ultraviolet-A light and riboflavin for the treatment of progressive keratoconus] [In French]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2009;32:1-7.
20. Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, et al. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:796-801. (Pubitemid 351615507)
21. Vinciguerra P, Albe E, Trazza S, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative effects of corneal collagen cross-linking on progressive keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1258-65.
22. Alio JL, Shabayek MH, Artola A. Intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus correction: long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:978-85. (Pubitemid 43949464)
23. Colin J, Malet FJ. Intacs for the correction of keratoconus: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:69-74. (Pubitemid 44959731)
24. Hedblom CEE. The role of polysaccharides in corneal swelling. Exp Eye Res 1961;1:81-91.
25. Spoerl E, Raiskup-Wolf F, Kuhlisch E, et al. Cigarette smoking is negatively associated with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2008;24:S737-40.
26. Hafezi F. Smoking and corneal biomechanics. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2259.
27. Iomdina E, Arutunyan L, Ignatieva N, et al. Ocular rigidity and ocular response analyzer. Acta Opthalmologica 2009;87:(Suppl 244): EVER Abstract 2154.
28. Kopaeva VG, Zatulina NI, Legkikh LS. [Clinical and morphological aspects of the state of the sclera in various types of genetically determined corneal changes] [In Russian]. Vestn Oftalmol 1992;108:17-19.
29. Nash IS, Greene PR, Foster CS. Comparison of mechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res 1982;35:413-24. (Pubitemid 13250623)