Hippocampus is necessary for spatial discrimination using distal cue-configuration

Hippocampus

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 609-621

  Kim, Jangjin ^a   Lee, Inah ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Configuration; Context; Generalization; Hippocampus; Muscimol; Pattern completion

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; NEUROTOXICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; MUSCIMOL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 79956339364     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: 10981063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20784     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson MI, Jeffery KJ. 2003. Heterogeneous modulation of place cell firing by changes in context. J Neurosci 23: 8827-8835.
2. Anderson MI, Killing S, Morris C, O'Donoghue A, Onyiagha D, Stevenson R, Verriotis M, Jeffery KJ. 2006. Behavioral correlates of the distributed coding of spatial context. Hippocampus 16: 730-742.
3. Davidson TL, McKernan MG, Jarrard LE. 1993. Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: A challenge to configural association theory. Behav Neurosci 107: 227-234.
4. Dellu F, Fauchey V, Moal ML, Simon H. 1997. Extension of a new two-trial memory task in the rat: Influence of environmental context on recognition processes. Neurobiol Lear Mem 67: 112-120.
5. Gallagher M, Holland PC. 1992. Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage. Hippocampus 2: 81-88.
6. Gilbert PE, Kesner RP, Lee I. 2001. Dissociating hippocampal subregions: Double dissociation between dentate gyrus and CA1. Hippocampus 11: 626-636.
7. Good M, Bannerman D. 1997. Differential effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the hippocampus and blockade of N-methyl-{D}-aspartate receptor-dependent long-term potentiation on contextual processing in rats. Behav Neurosci 111: 1171-1183.
8. Good M, Honey RC. 1991. Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats. Behav Neurosci 105: 499-509.
9. Good M, de Hoz L, Morris RGM. 1998. Contingent versus incidental context processing during conditioning: Dissociation after excitotoxic hippocampal plus dentate gyrus lesions. Hippocampus 8: 147-159.
10. Hayman RM, Chakraborty S, Anderson MI, Jeffery KJ. 2003. Context-specific acquisition of location discrimination by hippocampal place cells. Eur J Neurosci 18: 2825-2834.
11. Hirsh R. 1974. The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: A theory. Behav Biol 12: 421-444.
12. Hobin JA, Ji J, Maren S. 2006. Ventral hippocampal muscimol disrupts context-specific fear memory retrieval after extinction in rats. Hippocampus 16: 174-182.
13. Holt W, Maren S. 1999. Muscimol inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus impairs contextual retrieval of fear memory. J Neurosci 19: 9054-9062.
14. Kennedy PJ, Shapiro ML. 2004. Retrieving memories via internal context requires the hippocampus. J Neurosci 24: 6979-6985.
15. Kim JJ, Fanselow MS. 1992. Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. Science 256: 675-677.
16. Lee I, Kesner RP. 2003a. Differential roles of dorsal hippocampal subregions in spatial working memory with short versus intermediate delay. Behav Neurosci 117: 1044-1053.
17. Lee I, Kesner RP. 2003b. Time-dependent relationship between the dorsal hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex in spatial memory. J Neurosci 23: 1517-1523.
18. Lee I, Solivan F. 2008. The roles of the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in a spatial paired-association task. Learn Mem 15: 357-367.
19. Lee I, Yoganarasimha D, Rao G, Knierim JJ. 2004. Comparison of population coherence of place cells in hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3. Nature 430: 456-459.
20. Leutgeb JK, Leutgeb S, Treves A, Meyer R, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL, Moser M-B, Moser EI. 2005. Progressive transformation of hippocampal neuronal representations in "morphed" environments. Neuron 48: 345-358.
21. Leutgeb S, Leutgeb JK, Treves A, Moser M-B, Moser EI. 2004. Distinct ensemble codes in hippocampal areas CA3 and CA1. Science 305: 1295-1298.
22. McDonald RJ, Murphy RA, Guarraci FA, Gortler JR, White NM, Baker AG. 1997. Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations. Hippocampus 7: 371-388.
23. Moses SN, Winocur G, Ryan JD, Moscovitch M. 2007. Environmental complexity affects contextual fear conditioning following hippocampal lesions in rats. Hippocampus 17: 333-337.
24. Muller RU, Kubie JL. 1987. The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells. J Neurosci 7: 1951-1968.
25. Mumby DG, Gaskin S, Glenn MJ, Schramek TE, Lehmann H. 2002. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: Memory for objects, places, and contexts. Learn Mem 9: 49-57.
26. O'Keefe J, Nadel L. 1978. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27. O'Reilly RC, McClelland JL. 1994. Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade-off. Hippocampus 4: 661-682.
28. Phillips RG, LeDoux JE. 1992. Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. Behav Neurosci 106: 274-285.
29. Piterkin P, Cole E, Cossette M-P, Gaskin S, Mumby DG. 2008. A limited role for the hippocampus in the modulation of novel-object preference by contextual cues. Learn Mem 15: 785-791.
30. Rajji T, Chapman D, Eichenbaum H, Greene R. 2006. The role of CA3 hippocampal NMDA receptors in paired associate learning. J Neurosci 26: 908-915.
31. Rolls ET, Kesner RP. 2006. A computational theory of hippocampal function, and empirical tests of the theory. Prog Neurobiol 79: 1-48.
32. Rudy JW, Matus-Amat P. 2005. The ventral hippocampus supports a memory representation of context and contextual fear conditioning: Implications for a unitary function of the hippocampus. Behav Neurosci 119: 154-163.
33. Rudy JW, Sutherland RJ. 1989. The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configural discriminations. Behav Brain Res 34: 97-109.
34. Rudy JW, Sutherland RJ. 1995. Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus 5: 375-389.
35. Shapiro ML, Tanila H, Eichenbaum H. 1997. Cues that hippocampal place cells encode: Dynamic and hierarchical representation of local and distal stimuli. Hippocampus 7: 624-642.
36. Smith DM, Mizumori SJ. 2006. Learning-related development of context-specific neuronal responses to places and events: The hippocampal role in context processing. J Neurosci 26: 3154-3163.
37. Vazdarjanova A, Guzowski JF. 2004. Differences in hippocampal neuronal population responses to modifications of an environmental context: Evidence for distinct, yet complementary, functions of CA3 and CA1 ensembles. J Neurosci 24: 6489-6496.
38. Winocur G, Olds J. 1978. Effects of context manipulation on memory and reversal learning in rats with hippocampal lesions. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92: 312-321.