Contingent versus incidental context processing during conditioning: Dissociation after excitotoxic hippocampal plus dentate gyrus lesions

Hippocampus

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 147-159

  Good, M ^a,b   De Hoz, L ^a   Morris, R G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conditional discrimination; Context; Hippocampus; Ibotenic acid; Incidental and contingent processing

Indexed keywords

IBOTENIC ACID;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN INJURY; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTATE GYRUS; DISSOCIATION; HIPPOCAMPUS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TRAINING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BRAIN MAPPING; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CUES; DENTATE GYRUS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID AGONISTS; HIPPOCAMPUS; IBOTENIC ACID; MALE; ODORS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS;

EID: 0031939136     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1998)8:2<147::AID-HIPO7>3.0.CO;2-I     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alvarado MC, Rudy JW. A comparison of "configural" discrimination problems: implications for understanding the role of the hippocampal formation in learning and memory. Psychobiology 1995;23:178-184.
2. Davis S, Butcher SP, Morris RGM. The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro. J Neurosci 1992;12:21-34.
3. Davidson TL, McKernan MG, Jarrard LW. Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: a challenge to configural association theory Behavi Neurosci 1993;107:227-234.
4. Gaffan D. Spatial organisation of episodic memory. Hippocampus 1991;1:262-264.
5. Gaffan D. Scene-specific memory for objects: a model of episodic memory impairments in monkeys with fornix transection. J Cogn Neurosci 1994;6:305-320.
6. Gaffan D, Harrison S. Place memory and scene memory: effects of fornix transection in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 1989;74:202-121
7. Gallagher M, Holland PC. Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage. Hippocampus 1992;2:81-88.
8. Good M, Bannerman D. Differential effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the hippocampus and blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-dependent long-term potentiation on contextual processing in rats. Behav Neurosci 1997;111:1171-1183.
9. Good M, Honey RC. Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats. Behav Neurosci 1991;105:499-509.
10. Good M, Honey RC. Dissociable effects of selective lesions to hippocampal subsystems on exploratory behavior, contextual learning, and spatial learning. Behav Neurosci 1997;111:487-493.
11. Granger R, Wiebe SP, Taketani M, Lynch G. Distinct memory circuits composing the hippocampal region. Hippocampus 1996;6:567-578.
12. Hall G, Honey RC. Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues. J Exp Psychol Animal Behav Process 1989;15:232-241.
13. Hirsh R. The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: a theory. Behav Biol 1974;12:421-444.
14. Hirsh R. The hippocampus, conditional operations and cognition. Physiol Psychol 1980;8:175-182.
15. Honey RC, Good M. Selective hippocampal leaons abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behav Neurosc 1993;107:23-33.
16. Honey RC, Watt A, Good M. Hippocampal lesions disrupt an associative mismatch process. J Neurosci 1998;18:2226-2230.
17. Jarrard LE. On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci Methods 1989;29:251-259.
18. Kim JJ, Fanselow MS. Modality specific retrograde amnesia of fear following hippocampal lesions. Science 1992;256:675-677.
19. Lovibond PF, Preston GC, Mackintosh NJ. Context specificty of conditioning and latent inhibition. J Exp Psychol Animal Behav Process 1984;10:360-375.
20. Maren S, Aharonov G, Fanselow MS. Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats. Behav Brain Res 1997;88:261-274.
21. McDonald RJ, Murphy RA, Guarraci FA Gortler JR, White NM, Baker AG. Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations. Hippocampus 1997;7:371-388.
22. McNish KA, Gewertz JC, Davis M. Evidence of contextual fear after lesions of the hippocampus: a disruption of freezing but not fear-potentiated startle. J Neurosci 1997;17:9353-9360.
23. O'Keefe J, Nadel L. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.
24. Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic co-ordinates. Sydney: Academic Press, 1986.
25. Phillips RG, LeDoux JE. Lesions of the dorsal hippocampal formation interfere with background but not foreground contextual fear conditioning. Learning Memory 1994;1:34-44.
26. Preston GC, Dickinson A, Mackintosh NJ. Contextual conditional discriminations. Q J Exp Psychol 1986;38B:217-237.
27. Rolls ET. A theory of hippocampal function in memory. Hippocampus 1996;6:601-620.
28. Rudy JW, Sutherland RJ. Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: an appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus 1995; 5:375-389.
29. Spear NE (1971) Forgetting as retrieval failure In: Honig WK, James PHR, eds. Animal memory. New York: Academic Press, p. 45-109, 1971.
30. Spear NE. Retrieval of memory in animals. Psychol Rev 1973;80:163-194.
31. Spear NE, Smith GJ, Bryan R, Gordon W, Timmons R, Chiszar D. Contextual influences on the interaction between conflicting memories in the rat. Animal Learn Behav 1980;8:273-281.
32. Sutherland RJ, Rudy JW. Configural association theory: The contribution of the hippocampus to learning, memory and amnesia. Psychobiology 1989;17:129-144.
33. Swartzentruber D, Bouton ME. Contextual control of negative transfer produced by prior CS-US pairings. Learn Motiv 1986;17:366-385.
34. Wagner AR. Priming in STM: an information processing mechanism for self-generated depression in perfromance. In: Tighe TJ, Leaton RN, eds. Habituation: perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976:95-128.
35. Wagner AR. Expectancies and the priming of STM. In: Hulse SH, Fowler H, Honig WK, eds. Cognitive aspects of animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978:177-209.
36. Wagner AR. SOP: a model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In: Spear NE, Miller RR eds. Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981:5-48.
37. Whishaw IQ, Tomie JA. Acquisition and retention by hippocampal rats of simple, conditional, and configural tasks using tactile and olfactory cues: implications for hippocampal function. Behav Neurosci 1991; 105:787-797.