Free-breathing MRI for the assessment of myocardial infarction: Clinical validation

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 192, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Van Den Bosch, Harrie C M ^a   Westenberg, Jos J M ^b   Post, Johannes C ^a   Yo, Glenn ^a   Verwoerd, Jan ^c   Kroft, Lucia J M ^b   De Roos, Albert ^b  

^a CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Heart; Ischemia; MRI; Myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREATHING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS; BREATHING MECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67049146317     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1580     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1445-1453 (Pubitemid 30832880)
2. Edelman RR. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the heart: overview of the literature. Radiology 2004; 232:653-668 (Pubitemid 39100246)
3. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel F, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002; 105:162-167 (Pubitemid 34084313)
4. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast- enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003; 361:374-379 (Pubitemid 36164969)
5. Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Hirano T, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: myocardial viability assessment in patients early thereafter-comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging with resting 201TI SPECT. Radiology 2003; 226:138-144 (Pubitemid 36163921)
6. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001; 218:215-223 (Pubitemid 32151298)
7. Kühl HP, Papavasiliu TS, Beek AM, Hofman MB, Heusen NS, van Rossum AC. Myocardial viability: rapid assessment with delayed contrastenhanced MR imaging with three-dimensional inversion-recovery prepared pulse sequence. Radiology 2004; 230:576-582 (Pubitemid 38133825)
8. Dewey M, Laule M, Taupitz M, et al. Myocardial viability: assessment with three-dimensional MR imaging in pigs and patients. Radiology 2006; 239:703-709 (Pubitemid 43830605)
9. Saranathan M, Rochitte CE, Foo TK. Fast, three-dimensional free-breathing MR imaging of myocardial infarction: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51:1055-1060 (Pubitemid 38580620)
10. Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Karassimos E, Günther RW, Stuber M. Navigator-gated and real-time motion corrected free-breathing MR imaging of myocardial late enhancement. Rofo 2002; 174:562-567 (Pubitemid 34632768)
11. Kellman P, Larson A, Hsu L, et al. Motion-corrected free-breathing delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53:194-200 (Pubitemid 40110492)
12. Huber A, Schoenberg SO, Spannagl B, et al. Single- shot inversion recovery trueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction. AJR 2006; 186: 627-633 (Pubitemid 46100248)
13. Pruessmann KP, Wieger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:952-962 (Pubitemid 29521486)
14. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. Circulation 2002; 105:539-542
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
16. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100:1992-2002 (Pubitemid 29529292)
17. Peukert D, Laule M, Taupitz M, et al. 3D and 2D delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for detection of myocardial infarction: preclinical and clinical results. Acad Radiol 2007; 14:788-794 (Pubitemid 46898848)
18. Huber A, Schönberg SO, Spannagl B, Rieber J, Klauss V, Reiser MF. Determining myocardial viability in myocardial infarct: comparison of single and multislice MRI techniques with turboFlash and trueFISP sequences [in German]. Radiologe 2004; 44:146-151 (Pubitemid 38315907)