Survival rate of Sealed, Refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 134-139

  Fernández, Eduardo M ^a   Martin, Javier A ^a   Angel, Pablo A ^a   Mjör, Ivar A ^b   Gordan, Valeria V ^b   Moncada, Gustavo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative treatments; Amalgam; Operative dentistry; Resin based composites; Restorations failures

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956315973     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 18064760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200008     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
2. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000;50:361-366.
3. Mjör IA. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981;6:49-54.
4. Gordan VV, Riley JL 3rd, Blaser PK, Mjör IA. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:418-425.
5. Gordan VV. Clinical evaluation of replacement of class V resin based composite restorations. J Dent 2001;29:485-488.
6. Gordan VV. In vitro evaluation of margins of replaced resin-based composite restorations. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:209-215.
7. Moncada G, Martin J, Fernandez E, Hempel MC, Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:425-432.
8. Moncada G, Martin J, Fernandez E, Vildósola P, Caamano C, Caro MJ, et al. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. Gen Dent 2006;54:314-318.
9. Ekstrand KR, Kuzmina IN, Kuzmina E, Christiansen ME. Two and a half-year outcome of caries-preventive programs offered to groups of children in the Solntsevsky district of Moscow. Caries Res 2000;34:8-19.
10. Cvar J, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorations materials, in 1971, US Public Health Service: San Francisco.
11. Moncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent 2008 33:258-264.
12. Mjör IA. Dentin permeability: the basis for understanding pulp reactions and adhesive technology. Braz Dent J 2009;20:3-16.
13. Tyas MJ, Anusavice K, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry-a review. Int Dent J 2000;50:1-12.
14. Mjör IA. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J 1993;43:466-472.
15. Downer M, Azli N, Bedi R, Moles D, Setchell D. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Brit Dent J, 1999;187: 432-439.
16. Ozcan M, Schoonbeek G, Gokce B, Comlekoglu E, Dundar M. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure. Oper Dent 2010;35:655-662.
17. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. Effect of biofilm on the repair bond strengths of composites. J Dent Res 2010;89:1476-1481.
18. Smales RJ Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival of repaired amalgams, recemented crowns and gold castings. Oper Dent 2004;29:249-253.