In vitro evaluation of margins of replaced resin-based composite restorations

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 209-215

  Gordan, Valeria V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILUX PLUS;

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INCISOR; METHODOLOGY; RETREATMENT;

COMPOSITE RESINS; CUSPID; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; HUMANS; INCISOR; RESIN CEMENTS; RETREATMENT;

EID: 0034574213     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00223.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Ver-schueren M, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1690–1702.
2. Braem M, Van Doren VE, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Determination of Young’s modulus of dental composites: a phenome-nological model. J Mater Sci 1987; 22:2037–2042.
3. Kemp-Schölte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1240–1243.
4. Jordan RE, Suzuki M, Boksman L, Skinner DF. Labial resin veneer restorations using visible light-cured composite materials. Alpha Omegan 1981; 74:30–39.
5. Bagheri J, Denehy GE. Effect of restoration thickness at the cavosurface bevel on the Class rV acid-etch retained composite resin restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54:175–177.
6. Yates JL, Hembree JH Jr. Fracture resistance of Class IV composite restorations. Arkansas Dent J 1977; 48:10–14.
7. Crim GA. Management of the fractured incisor. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 96:99–100.
8. Hardison JD. Preparation and restoration of anterior teeth with composite resin: a survey of dental schools. Oper Dent 1987; 12:95–99.
9. Bagheri J, Denehy GE. Effect of enamel bevel and restoration lengths on Class IV acid-etch retained composite resin restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 107:951–953.
10. Jordan RE, Suzuki M, Gwinnett AJ, Hunter JK. Restoration of fractured and hypoplastic incisors by the acid-etch resin technique: a three-year report. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 95:795–803.
11. Donly KJ. Posterior composite resin: use for anterior restorations. J Dent Child 1990; 5:260–262.
12. Low T, Von Fraunhofer JA. The direct use of composite materials in adhesive dentistry. Br Dent J 1976; 141:207–213.
13. Donly KJ, Browning R. Class IV preparation design for microfilled and macrofilled composite resin. Pediatr Dent 1992; 14:34–36.
14. Marzouk MA, Bahiji AHF. Influence of enamel cavosurface configuration on marginal leakage in Class V composite resin restorations. Am J Dent 1989; 2:165–169.
15. Davis MJ, Roth J, Levi M. Marginal integrity of adhesive fracture restorations: chamfer versus bevel. Quintessence Int 1983; 11:1135–1139.
16. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70:308–314.
17. Tan DE, Tjan AH. Margin designs and fracture resistance of incisal resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1992; 5:15–18.
18. Black JB, Retief DH, Lemons JE. Effect of cavity design on retention of Class IV composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1981; 103:42–46.
19. Ripa LW, Sheykholeslam Z. Acid etch technique of fracture repair: description and current status. J Pedod 1978; 2:128–143.
20. Nelson SR, Till MJ, Hinding JH. Comparison of materials and methods used in acid-etch restorative procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1981; 103:42–46.
21. Rule DC, Elliott B. Semi-permanent restoration of fractured incisors in young patients: a clinical evaluation of one acid-etch technique. Br Dent J 1975; 139: 272–275.
22. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55:58–63.
23. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48:305–311.
24. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 2000; 31:165–179.
25. Mjör IA, Reep RL, Kubilis PS, Mondragon BE. The change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: a methodology study. Oper Dent 1998; 23:272–277.
26. Millar BJ, Robinson PB, Davies BR. Effects of the removal of composite resin restorations on Class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992; 173:210–212.
27. Owens BM, Gallien GS. Noncarious dental “abfraction” lesions in an aging population. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1995; 16:557–558.
28. Mjör IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 1998;29:313–317.
29. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class II preparations. J Dent 1997; 25:379–389.
30. Heymann HO, Roberson TM, Sockwell CL. Direct tooth-colored restorations for Classes III, IV, and V cavity preparations. In: Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, eds. The art and science of operative dentistry. 3rd Ed. St. Louis: CVMosby, 1995:543–570.
31. Gordan W, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent 1997; 10:219–223.
32. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26:1–20.
33. Lutz F, Krejci I, Mormann W. Zie zahn-farbene Seitenzahn-Restauration. Phillip J Restaurative Zahnmed 1987; 4:127–137.
34. Swift EJ, Le Valley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 1992; 8:362–365.
35. Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99:173–180.
36. Swift EJ, Cloe BC, Boyer DB. Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent 1994; 7:200–202.