The role of feeling in the entertainment=emotion formula

Journal of Media Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 6-11

  Cupchik, Gerald C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

culture; emotion; interest; media; pleasure; self

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956272943     PISSN: 18641105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000025     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arnheim, R. (1985). The other Gustav Theodor Fechner. In S.Koch & D. E.Leary (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 856-865). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Berlyne, D. E. (1949). 'Interest' as a psychological concept. British Journal of Psychology, 39, 184-195.
3. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4. Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
5. Braun, I., & Cupchik, G. C. (2001). Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 85-109.
6. Bullough, E. (1912). 'Psychical distance' as a factor in art and as an aesthetic principle. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 87-98.
7. Coleridge, S. T. (1983). Biographia literaria I & II. In J.Engell & W. J.Bate (Eds.), The collected works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (Vol. 7). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1817).
8. Cupchik, G. C. (1995). Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23, 177-188. (Pubitemid 43090383)
9. Cupchik, G. C. (2002). The evolution of psychical distance as an aesthetic concept. Culture and Psychology, 8, 155-188.
10. Cupchik, G. C. (in press). Framing emotional responses to mass media. In K.Döveling, C.von Scheve, & E.Konijn (Eds.), Handbook of emotion and mass media. London: Routledge.
11. Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. J. (1990). Interest and pleasure as dimensions of aesthetic response. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 1-14.
12. Cupchik, G. C., & Gignac, A. (2007). Finding meaning and expressing emotion in response to artworks. Visual Arts Research, 33, 56-71.
13. Cupchik, G. C., & Hilscher, M. C. (2008). Phenomenology and the design experience. In P. P. M.Hekkert & R.Schifferstein (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 241-255). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. Cupchik, G. C., & Laszlo, J. (1994). The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 297-312.
15. Cupchik, G. C., Leonard, G., Axelrad, E., & Kalin, J. (1998). The landscape of emotion in literary reception: Generating and receiving interpretations of James Joyce. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 825-847.
16. Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (1998). Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25, 363-377. (Pubitemid 41168175)
17. Cupchik, G. C., & Shereck, L. (1998). Generating and receiving contextualized interpretations of sculptures. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 179-191.
18. Cupchik, G. C., & Winston, A. S. (1992). Reflection and reaction: A dual-process analysis of emotional responses to art. In L. Y.Dorfman, D. A.Leontiev, V. M.Petrov, & V. A.Sozinov (Eds.), Art and emotions, Vol 2, (pp. 65-72). Perm, CIS: The Perm State Institute of Culture.
19. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.
20. Dixon, T. (2003). From passions to emotions: The creation of a secular psychological category. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Fechner, G. (1978). Die Vorschule der Aesthetik[The preschool of aesthetics] (Vols. 1-2). Hildesheim: Georg Holms. (Original work published 1876).
22. Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
23. Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
24. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). The uses of mass communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Osgood, C., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
26. Schmidt, S. J. (1982). Foundations for the empirical study of literature (R.de BeaugrandeTrans.). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
27. Schneider, H. J. (1995). The staging of the gaze: Aesthetic illusion and the scene of nature in the eighteenth century. In W.Pape & F.Burwick (Eds.), Reflecting senses: Perception and appearance in literature, culture, and the arts (pp. 77-95). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
28. Vorderer, P., Cupchik, G. C., & Oatley, K. (1997). Encountering the literary landscapes of experience and action from self-oriented and spectator perspectives. In S.Tötösy de Zepetnek & I.Sywenky (Eds.), The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application. University of Alberta, Canada: RICL-CCS and Siegen University, Germany: LUMIS (pp. 559-571).
29. Wilkinson, E. M. (1945). Johann Elias Schlegel: A German pioneer in aesthetics. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
30. Wundt, W. (1874). Grundriss der psychologischen Psychologie[Compendium of psychological psychology]. Leipzig: Engelmann.