The Landscape of Emotion in Literary Encounters

Cognition and Emotion

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 825-847

  Cupchik, Gerald C ^c   Leonard, Garry ^d   Axelrad, Elise ^a   Kalin, Judith D ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346278086     PISSN: 02699931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026999398379457     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Avital, T., & Cupchik, G.C. (1998). Perceiving hierarchical structures in nonrepresentational paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 59-70.
2. Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. New York: Hill & Wang. (Original work published 1970)
3. Bartlett, F.C. (1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1932).
4. Brewer, W.F. (1996). The nature of narrative suspense and the problem of rereading. In P. Vorderer, H.J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 107-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Brewer, W.F., & Lichtenstein, E.H. (1981). Event schemes, story schemas, and story grammars. In C.R. Cooper (Ed.). Attention and performance IX (pp. 363-379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Brooks, C. (1947). The well wrought urn. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
7. Bruner, J.S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.
8. Cupchik, G.C., & Gebotys, R.J. (1988). The search for meaning in art: Interpretive styles and judgments of quality. Visual Arts Research, 14, 38-50.
9. Cupchik, G.C., & Laszlo, J. (1994). The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 297-312.
10. Cupchik, G.C., & Leonard, G. (1997). The two 'I's of the aesthetic process. In L. Dorfman, C. Martindale, D. Leontiev, G. Cupchik, V. Petrov, & P. Machotka (Eds.), Emotion, Creativity, and Art (pp. 81-100). Perm, Russia: Perm Institute for Arts and Culture.
11. Cupchik, G.C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (in press). Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics.
12. Cupchik , G.C., & Shereck, L. (1998). Generating and receiving contextualized interpretations of figurative sculptures. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 179-191.
13. Cupchik, G.C., Shereck, L., & Spiegel, S. (1994). The effects of textual information on artistic communication. Visual Arts Research, 20, 62-78.
14. Cupchik, G.C., Spiegel, S., & Shereck, L. (1996). Unity in the diversity of aesthetic response. Visual Arts Research, 22, 1-10.
15. Cupchik, G.C., Winston, A.S., & Herz, R.S. (1992). Judgments of similarity and difference between paintings. Visual Arts Research, 18, 36-49.
16. Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L.C., & Leung, A. (1993). Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations. Poetics, 22, 5-33.
17. Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1962).
18. Eliot, T.S. (1953). Hamlet. In J. Hayward (Ed.), T.S. Eliot: Selected prose (pp. 104-109). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1932)
19. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
21. Graves, B., & Frederiksen, C.H. (1991). Literary expertise in the description of a fictional narrative. Poetics, 20, 1-26.
22. Holland, N. (1975). Five readers reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Deckett. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University.
24. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University.
25. Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26. Larson, S.F., & Laszlo J. (1990). Cultural-historical knowledge and personal experience in appreciation of literature. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 425-440.
27. Lockhart, R.S., Craik, F.I.M., & Jacoby, L.L. (1976). Depth of processing in recognition and recall: some aspects of a general memory system. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recognition and recall (pp. 75-102). London: Wiley.
28. Millis, K. (1995). Encoding discourse perspective during the reading of a literary text. Poetics, 23, 235-253.
29. Schmidt, S. (1982). Foundations for the empirical study of literature. R. de Beaugrande (Ed. and Trans.). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
30. Scholes, R., & Litz, A.W. (Eds.) (1969). Dubliners: Text, criticism, and notes. New York: Viking.
31. Shklovsky, V. (1988). Art as technique. In D. Lodge (Ed.). Modern criticism and theory (pp. 16-30). New York: Longman. (Original work published 1917)
32. Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 2, 279-301.
33. Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
34. Winston, A.S., & Cupchik, G.C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1-14.