Effects of seasonality, isolation and patch quality for habitat selection processes by mute swans Cygnus olor in a fishpond landscape

Oikos

Volumn 120, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 801-812

  Gayet, Guillaume ^a   Guillemain, Matthieu ^b   Benmergui, Maurice ^b   Mesleard, François ^c,d   Boulinier, Thierry ^e   Bienvenu, Jean Philippe ^b   Fritz, Hervé ^f   Broyer, Joël ^b  

^a Fédération Départementale des Chasseurs de l'Ain ^*  (France)

^b OFFICE NATIONAL DE LA CHASSE ET DE LA FAUNE SAUVAGE   (France)

^c STATION BIOLOGIQUE DE LA TOUR DU VALAT   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AVIGNON   (France)

^e CNRS   (France)

^f LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉTRIE ET BIOLOGIE EVOLUTIVE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; COEXISTENCE; CULTIVATION; DRAINAGE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; HABITAT SELECTION; HETEROGENEITY; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; LANDSCAPE; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; PATCH DYNAMICS; POLICY MAKING; POND; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SEASONAL VARIATION; SEASONALITY; SIZE; TERRITORIALITY; WATERFOWL;

AIN; DOMBES; FRANCE; RHONE-ALPES;

AVES; CYGNUS OLOR;

EID: 79956266831     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18750.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aldridge C. L. and Boyce M. S. 2008. Accounting for fitness: combining survival and selection when assessing wildlife-habitat relationships. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54: 389-419.
2. Benmergui M. et al. 2005. L'expansion du Cygne tuberculé en Dombes. Faune Sauvage 266: 22-28, in French.
3. Bolker B. M. et al. 2008. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 127-135.
4. Boulinier T. et al. 2001. Forest fragmentation and bird community dynamics: inference at regional scales. Ecology 82: 1159-1169.
5. Brown M. and Dinsmore J. J. 1986. Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. J. Wildlife Manage. 50: 392-397.
6. Burnham K. P. and Anderson D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach, 2nd ed. - Springer.
7. Charnov E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9: 129-136.
8. Conover M. R. and Kania G. S. 1994. Impact of interspecific aggression and herbivory by mute swans on native waterfowl and aquatic vegetation in New England. Auk 11: 744-748.
9. Cox D. R. 1972. Regression models and life-tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. 34: 187-220.
10. Dormann C. F. 2007. Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 129-138.
11. Flint P. L. et al. 2000. Annual survival and site fidelity of Steller's eiders molting along the Alaska peninsula. J. Wildlife Manage. 64: 261-268.
12. Gayet G. et al. 2011. Are mute swans (Cygnus olor) really limiting fishpond use by waterbirds in the Dombes, eastern France. J. Ornithol. 152: 45-53.
13. Gustafson E. J. and Parker G. R. 1994. Using an index of habitat patch proximity for landscape design. Landscape Urban Plan. 29: 117-130.
14. Haig S. M. et al. 1998. Avian movements and wetland connectivity in landscape conservation. Conserv. Biol. 12: 749-758.
15. Hu P. et al. 1998. Estimating the parameters in the Cox model when covariate variables are measured with error. Biometrics 54: 1407-1417.
16. Johnson C. J. et al. 2006. Resource selection functions based on used-availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods. J. Wildlife Manage. 70: 347-357.
17. Koenig W. D. and Knops J. M. H. 1998. Testing spatial autocorrelation in ecological studies. Ecography 21: 423-429.
18. Kurki S. et al. 2000. Landscape fragmentation and forest composition grouse breeding success in boreal forests. Ecology 81: 1985-1997.
19. La Montagne J. M. et al. 2003. Characteristics of ponds used by trumpeter swans in a spring migration stopover area. Can. J. Zool. 81: 1791-1798.
20. Legendre P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74: 1659-1673.
21. Lin D. Y. and Wei L. J. 1989. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 84: 1074-1078.
22. MacKenzie D. I. et al. 2003. Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84: 2200-2207.
23. Manly B. F. J. et al. 2002. Resource selection by animals: statistical analysis and analysis for field studies. - Kluwer.
24. Moilanen A. and Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79: 2503-2515.
25. Mönkkönen M. and Forsman J. T. 2002. Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review. Ornithol. Sci. 1: 41-51.
26. O'Briain M. et al. 1998. Breeding, moulting, and site fidelity of Brant (Branta bernicla) on Bathurst and Seymour Islands in the Canadian High Arctic. Arctic 51: 350-360.
27. Paracuellos M. and Telleria J. L. 2004. Factors affecting the distribution of a waterbird community: the role of habitat configuration and bird abundance. Waterbirds 27: 446-453.
28. Pulliam H. R. and Danielson B. J. 1991. Sources, sinks and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137: 50-66.
29. Rangel T. F. L. V. B. et al. 2006. Towards in integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15: 321-327.
30. Ritchie M. E. 1998. Scale-dependent foraging and patch choice in fractal environments. Evol. Ecol. 12: 309-330.
31. Rittenhouse T. A. et al. 2009. Survival costs associated with wood frog breeding migrations: effects of timber harvest and drought. Ecology 90: 1620-1630.
32. Rowell H. and Spray C. 2004. Mute swan Cygnus olor (Britain and Ireland population) in Britain and Northern Ireland 1960-1961-2000-2001. Waterbird Review Series 77. - The wildfowl and Wetlands Trust/Join Nature Conservation Committee, Slimbridge.
33. Senft R. L. et al. 1987. Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37: 789-799.
34. Spray C. J. et al. 2002. The migration Atlas: movements of the birds of Britain and Ireland. London. Wernham C. V. et al. (eds). - T & A D Poyser.
35. Stamps J. A. 1988. Conspecific attraction and aggregation interritorial species. Am. Nat. 131: 329-347.
36. Tableman M. and Kim J. S. 2004. Survival analysis using S. Analysis of time-to-event data. - Chapman et Hall/CRC.
37. Thomas D. L. and Taylor E. J. 2006. Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability II. J. Wildlife Manage. 70: 324-336.
38. Villard M. A. et al. 1999. Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv. Biol. 13: 774-783.
39. Wilson T. L. et al. 2009. Relative importance of habitat area and isolation for bird occurrence patterns in a naturally patchy landscape. Landscape Ecol. 24: 351-360.