Testing for spatial autocorrelation in ecological studies

Ecography

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 423-429

  Koenig, Walter D ^a   Knops, Johannes M H ^b  

^a Center for Gender Refugee Studies   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; ECOLOGY; SPATIAL VARIATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ACCIPITRINAE; ANIMALIA; QUERCUS; QUERCUS DOUGLASII; SCIURIDAE;

EID: 0031847393     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00407.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bock, C. E. and Root, T. L. 1981. The Christmas Bird Count and avian ecology. - Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 17-23.
2. de Queiroz, K. and Good, D. A. 1997. Phenetic clustering in biology: a critique. - Q. Rev. Biol. 72: 3-30.
3. Ehrlich, P. R., Dobkin, D. S. and Wheye, D. 1988. The birder's handbook. - Simon and Shuster, New York.
4. Fortin, M.-J. and Gurevitch, J. 1993. Mantel tests: spatial structure in field experiments. - In: Sheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J. (eds), Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, pp. 342-359.
5. Hanski, I. and Woiwod, I. P. 1993. Spatial synchrony in the dynamics of moth and aphid populations. - J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 656-668.
6. _ , Hansson, L. and Henttonen, H. 1991. Specialist predators, generalist predators, and the microtine rodent cycle. -J. Anim. Ecol. 60: 353-367.
7. Heikkilä, J., Below, A. and Hanski, I. 1994. Synchronous population dynamics of microtine rodent populations on islands in Lake Inari in northern Fennoscandia: evidence for regulation by mustelid predators. - Oikos 70: 245-252.
8. Ims, R. A. and Steen, H. 1990. Geographical synchrony in microtine population cycles: A theoretical evaluation of the role of nomadic avian predators. - Oikos 57: 381-387.
9. Kelly, P. M. et al. 1989. Climate and signature years in west European oaks. - Nature 340: 57-60.
10. Koenig, W. D. 1998. Spatial autocorrelation in California land birds. - Conserv. Biol. in press.
11. Krebs, C. J. 1972. Ecology. The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. - Harper and Row.
12. Legendre, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? - Ecology 74: 1659-1673.
13. _ and Fortin, M.-J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. - Vegetatio 80: 107-138.
14. May, R. M. 1976. Models for single populations. - In: May, R. M. (ed.), Theoretical ecology. Principles and application. Blackwell, pp. 5-29.
15. Oden, N. L. 1984. Assessing the significance of a spatial correlogram. - Geograph. Anal. 16: 1-16.
16. _ and Sokal, R. R. 1986. Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. -Syst. Zool. 35: 608-617.
17. Ranta, E. et al. 1995. Synchrony in population dynamics. -Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 262: 113-118.
18. _ et al. 1997. The Moran effect and synchrony in population dynamics. - Oikos 78: 136-142.
19. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. -Evolution 43: 223-225.
20. Sokal, R. R. 1978. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10: 199-228.
21. Sutcliffe O. L., Thomas, C. D. and Moss, D. 1996. Spatial synchrony and asynchrony in butterfly population dynamics. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 85-95.
22. Thompson, J. D. et al. 1996. Untangling multiple factors in spatial distributions: lilies, gophers, and rocks. - Ecology 77: 1698-1715.
23. Warner, J. S. and Rudd, R. L. 1975. Hunting by the white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus). - Condor 77: 226-230.