Global models for the national research university: Adoption and adaptation in Indonesia and Malaysia

Globalisation, Societies and Education

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 369-391

  Beerkens, Eric ^a  

^a Netherlands Organisation for International Cooperation in Higher Education   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Diffusion; Global models; Globalisation; Indonesia; Knowledge economy; Malaysia

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956232226     PISSN: 14767724     EISSN: 14767732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767724.2010.505099     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Beerkens, E. 2003. Global opportunities and institutional embeddedness; Higher education consortia in Europe and Southeast Asia. http://purl.org/utwente/50803.
2. Beerkens, E. In press. Centres of excellence and relevance: The contextualisation of global models. Science, Technology and Society.
3. Bell, D. 1973. The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
4. Boli, J., and G.M. Thomas. 1999. Constructing world culture; international non-governmental organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Buchbinder, H. 1993 The market oriented university and the changing role of knowledge. Higher Education 26, no. 3: 331-47.
6. Clark, B.R. 1996. Substantive growth and innovative organisation: New categories for higher education research. Higher Education 32, no. 4: 417-30.
7. Clark, B.R. 1998. Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
8. Common, R. 2001. Public management and policy transfer in Southeast Asia. Aldershot: Ashgate.
9. Cummings, W.K. 1998. The service university in comparative perspective. Higher Education 35, no. 1: 1-8.
10. Cyranoski, D. 2005. Malaysian biotechnology: The valley of ghosts. Nature 436, no. 7051: 620-1.
11. DiMaggio, P. 1991. Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920-1940. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, 267-92. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48, no. 2: 147-60.
13. Djelic, M.-L. 2008. Sociological studies of confusion: Is history relevant? Socio-Economic Review 6, no. 3: 538-57.
14. Etzkowitz, H. 1996. From knowledge flows to the triple helix. The transformation of academic-industry relations in the USA. Industry and Higher Education 10, no. 6: 337-42.
15. Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1997. Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Cassell.
16. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
17. Guillén, M.F. 2001. The limits of convergence: Globalization and organizational change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Guler, I., M.F. Guillén, and M. Macpherson. 2002. Global competition, institutions, and organizational change: The international diffusion of the ISO 9000 quality standards. Administrative Science Quarterly 47, no. 2: 207-32.
19. Henisz, W.J., B.A. Zelner, and M.F. Guillén. 2005. The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977-1999. American Sociological Review 70, no. 6: 871-97.
20. Hood, C. 1991. A public management for all seasons. Public Administration 69, no. 1: 3-19.
21. Irvine, J., and B.R. Martin. 1984. Foresight in science. Picking the winners. London: Frances Pinter.
22. Jongbloed, B., and L. Goedegebuure. 2001 From the entrepreneurial university to the stakeholder university. Paper presented at the International Congress on Universities and Regional Development in the Knowledge Society, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 12-14 November, in Barcelona.
23. Kanapathy, V. 2006. Country report Malaysia. Report for the 2006 Workshop on International Migration and Labour Markets in Asia. Tokyo: The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training.
24. Kerr, C. 1963. The uses of the university. New York: Harper & Row.
25. Kim, T. 2007. Old borrowings and new models of the university in East Asia. Globalisation, Societies and Education 5, no. 1: 39-52.
26. Lane, J.E. 2000. New public management. London: Routledge.
27. Lundvall, B.A. 1992. National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
28. March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization 52, no. 4: 943-69.
29. Marginson, S., and M. Considine. 2000. The enterprise university. Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Marginson, S., and E. Sawir. 2005. Interrogating global flows in higher education. Globalisation, Societies and Education 3, no. 3: 281-309.
31. Meyer, J., J. Boli, G. Thomas, and F. Ramirez. 1997. World society and the nation state. American Journal of Sociology 130, no. 1: 144-81.
32. Mok, K.H. 2003. Similar trends, diverse agendas: Higher education reforms in East Asia. Globalisation, Societies and Education 1, no. 2: 201-21.
33. Mok, K.H. 2007. Globalisation, new education governance and state capacity in East Asia. Globalisation, Societies and Education 5, no. 1: 1-21.
34. Nelson, R.R. 1993. National systems of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Rethinking science: Knowledge in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
36. Nugroho, H. 2005. The political economy of higher education: The university as an arena for the struggle of power. In Social science and power in Indonesia, ed. V.R. Hadiz and D. Dhakidae, 143-66. Jakarta: Equinox/ISEAS.
37. Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
38. Pollilo, S., and M.F. Guillén. 2005. Globalization pressures and the state: The global spread of central bank independence. American Journal of Sociology 110, no. 6: 1764-802.
39. Pollitt, C. 2002. Clarifying convergence; striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform. Public Management Review 4, no. 1: 471-92.
40. Ramasamy, B., A. Chakrabarty, and M. Cheah. 2004. Malaysia's leap into the future: An evaluation of the Multimedia Super Corridor. Technovation 24, no. 11: 871-83.
41. Rip, A. 2004. Strategic research, post-modern universities and research training. Higher Education Policy 17, no. 2: 153-66.
42. Sato, M. 2007. Dilemmas of public university reform in Malaysia. Melbourne: Monash University Press.
43. Scott, W.R. 1994. Institutions and organizations: Towards a theoretical synthesis. In Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism, ed. W.R. Scott and J.W. Meyer, 55-80. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Scott, W.R., M. Ruef, P. Mendel, and C.A. Coronna. 2000. Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45. Shapira, P., J. Youtie, K. Yogeesvaran, and Z. Jaafar. 2006. Knowledge economy measurement: Methods, results and insights from the Malaysian knowledge content study. Research Policy 35, no. 10: 1522-7.
46. Tierney, W.G. 1998. The responsive university: Restructuring for high performance. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
47. Tjeldvoll, A. 1997. A service university in Scandinavia. Oslo: University of Oslo/Institute for Educational Research.
48. Tjeldvoll, A. 1998. The idea of the service university. International Higher Education 13, Fall: 9-10.
49. Turner, M. 2002. Choosing items from the menu: New public management in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Public Administration 25, no. 12: 1493-512.