Internet disputes, fairness in arbitration and transnationalism: A reply to Julia Hörnle

International Journal of Law and Information Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 153-163

  Schultz, Thomas ^a,b,c  

^a GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c International Dispute Settlement ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956122413     PISSN: 09670769     EISSN: 14643693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/ear002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. D. Adams, A Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Life, the Universe, and Everything (Pan Books, London, 1979), chapter 34.
2. William W. Park, 'Arbitrators and Accuracy' (2010) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 25, 26.
3. Article 18 of the Arbitration Rules for the Olympic Games.
4. Thomas Schultz, 'Human Rights: A Speed Bump for Arbitral Procedures? An Exploration of Safeguards in the Acceleration of Justice' (2006) 9 International Arbitration Law Review 8.
5. Matthew H. Kramer, 'On the Moral Status of the Rule of Law' (2004) 64 Cambridge Law Journal 65, 67.
6. Joseph Raz, Practical Reason and Norms (OUP, Oxford, 1999), 155-156.
7. Matthew H. Kramer, In Defense of Legal Positivism (OUP, Oxford, 1999), 81-3.
8. Park (n 3) 27.
9. Léon Duguit and Hans Kelsen, Foreword (1926-1927) 1 Revue internationale de la théorie du droit 3, translated by the author.
10. Alex Mills, The Confluence of Private and Public International Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2009) 18: 'The distribution of regulatory authority is itself a question of justice - perhaps meta-justice - operating within the framework of justice pluralism. The answer to a problem of private international law involves the determination of which idea of justice (which state law) would be most just to apply. Private international law, properly understood, is about determining the most "just" distribution of regulatory authority.' Note Mills's focus on state law, a limitation that is not recognized by the present author.
11. Matthew H. Kramer, Objectivity and the Rule of Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2007).
12. See further Thomas Schultz, 'The Three Pursuits of Dispute Settlement' (2010) 1 Czech & Central European Yearbook of Arbitration 145.
13. Ethan Katsh, Janet Rifkin and Alan Gaitenby, '"eBay Law" ' (2000) 15 Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution 705.
14. See further Thomas Schultz, 'Private Legal Systems: What Cyberspace Might Teach Legal Theorists' (2007) 10 Yale Journal of Law & Technology 151.
15. See Brian Z. Tamanaha, On the Rule of Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2004) 96, who speaks of 'enhanc[ing] the dignity of citizens by allowing them to predict and plan, no doubt a moral positive'.