A novel human error probability assessment using Fuzzy modeling

Risk Analysis

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 745-757

  Ung, Shuen Tai ^a   Shen, Wei Min ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Fuzzy HEP; Fuzzy rule base; Human error assessment

Indexed keywords

DATA COMBINATION; DEFUZZIFICATIONS; DISCRIMINABILITY; FUZZY DATA; FUZZY HEP; FUZZY MODELING; FUZZY NUMBERS; FUZZY RULE BASE; HIGHER-DEGREE; HUMAN ERROR ASSESSMENT; HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITY; HUMAN ERRORS; LINGUISTIC TERMS; MEMBERSHIP VALUES; RULE BASE; SPECIFIC VALUES; TEST CASE; TRANSFORMATION PROCESS;

ERRORS; FUZZY RULES; LINGUISTICS; MEMBERSHIP FUNCTIONS; METADATA; RATING;

PROBABILITY;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DATA SET; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ERROR ANALYSIS; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; NUMERICAL MODEL;

ARTICLE; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMAN; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

FUZZY LOGIC; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79956089034     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01536.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hassana CRC, Balasubramaniam PAL, Raman AAA, Mahmood NZ, Hung FC, Sulaiman NMN. Inclusion of human errors assessment in failure frequency analysis: A case study for the transportation of ammonia by rail in Malaysia. Process Safety Progress, 2009; 28(1):60-67.
2. Ung ST, Williams V, Chen HS, Bonsall S, Wang J. Human error assessment and management in port operations using fuzzy AHP. Marine Technology Society Journal, 2006; 40(1):61-73.
3. Cepin M. Importance of human contribution within the human reliability analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2008; 21(3):268-276.
4. Kirwan B. Human error identification in human reliability assessment, part 1: Overview of approaches. Applied Ergonomics, 1992; 23(5):299-318.
5. Kirwan B. The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques-THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part 1-Technique descriptions and validation issues. Applied Ergonomics, 1996; 27(6):359-373.
6. Kirwan B. A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment. UK CRC Press, 1994.
7. Hollnagel E. Human Reliability Analysis-Context and Control. London Academic Press Inc. Ltd, 1993.
8. Fields RE. Analysis of Erroneous Actions in the Design of Critical Systems. PhD thesis, University of York, 2001.
9. Konstandinidou M, Nivolianitou Z, Kiranoudis C, Markatos N. A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006; 91:706-716.
10. Yang ZL, Wang J, Bonsall S, Fang QG. Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment. Risk Analysis, 2009; 29(1):95-120.
11. Ung ST, Williams V, Bonsall S, Wang J. The risk assessment and management of port security using fuzzy modelling. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 2009; 46:61-73.
12. Feng F, Jun YB, Liu XY, Li LF. An adjustable approach to fuzzy soft set based decision making. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2010; 234(1):10-20.
13. Dursun M, Karsak EE. A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010; 37(6):4324-4330.
14. Lee HM, Lin LL. New algorithm for applying fuzzy set theory to the facility site selection. International Journal of Innovative Computing Information and Control, 2010; 5(12B): 4953-4960.
15. Jones B, Jenkinson I, Wang J. The use of fuzzy set modelling for maintenance planning in a manufacturing industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E- Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 2010; 224(E1):35-48.
16. Lin CT, Wang MJJ. Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 1998; 58:205-213.
17. Pan NF. Evaluation of building performance using fuzzy FTA. Construction Management and Economics, 2006; 24:1241-1252.
18. Lian GS, Wang JJ. Fuzzy fault-tree analysis using failure possibility. Microelectronics and Reliability, 1993; 33(4):583-597.
19. Swain AD, Guttmann HE. Handbook of Human Reliability with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Application. Sandia National Laboratories Report NUREG/CR-1278-F, 1983.
20. Kuusela H, Spence MT, Kanto AJ. Expertise effects on pre-choice decision processes and final outcomes: A protocol analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 1998; 32(5/6):559-576.
21. Klir G J, Yuan B. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Application. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall Inc., 1995.
22. Zio E, Baraldi P, Librizzi M, Podofillini L, Dang VN. A fuzzy set-based approach for modeling dependence among human errors. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2009; 160:1947-1964.
23. Wang J. A subject methodology for safety analysis of safety requirements specifications. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 1997; 5(3):418-430.
24. Sii HS, Ruxton T, Wang J. A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative safety modeling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2001; 73(1):19-34.
25. Pillay A, Wang J. Risk assessment of fishing vessels using fuzzy set approach. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 2002; 9(2):163-181.
26. Valente TM, Gomes CL. Fuzzy modelling of acid mine drainage environments using geochemical, ecological and mineralogical indicators. Environmental Geology, 2009; 57(3):653-663.
27. Peeva K, Zahariev ZI. Computing behavior of finite fuzzy machines: Algorithm and its application to reduction and minimization. Information Sciences, 2008; 178(21):4152-4165.
28. Runkler TA, Glesner MA. A set of axioms for defuzzification strategies toward a theory of rational deffuzzification operators. Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Set System, New York, 1993:1161-1166.
29. Andrew JD, Moss TR. Reliability and Risk Assessment (2nd edition). Suffolk Professional Engineering Publishing Limited, 2002.
30. Onisawa T. An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1988; 27:87-103.
31. Li DQ, Tang WY, Zhang SK. Hybrid event tree calculation of ship grounding probability by piloting failure. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2003; 37(8):87-103.