Learning potential score as a predictor of sensitivity to cognitive intervention

Educational and Child Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 29-39

  Kozulin, Alex ^a  

^a International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956087646     PISSN: 02671611     EISSN: 23968702     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Berhanu, G. (2001). Learning-in-context: An ethnographic investigation of mediated learning experiences among Ethiopian Jews in Israel. Goteborg: Goteborg University Press.
2. Budoff, M. (1987a). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. Lidz (Ed.) Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential (pp. 52–81). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Budoff, M. (1987b). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. Lidz (Ed.) Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential (pp. 173–195). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Campione, J. & Brown, A. (1987). Linking dynamic testing with school achievement. In C. Lidz (Ed.) Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential (pp. 82–115). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Feuerstein, R. (1990). The theory of structural cognitive modifiability. In B. Presseisen (Ed.) Learning and thinking styles: Classroom interaction. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
6. Feuerstein, R. & Feuerstein, R. S. (2001). Is dynamic assessment compatible with the psychometric model? In A. and N. Kaufman (Eds.) Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents (pp. 218–246). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. & Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device (LPAD). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
8. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
9. Fernandez-Ballestos, R. & Calero, M.D. (2000). The assessment of the learning potential: The EPA instrument. In C. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.) Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 293–324). New York: Elsevier Science.
10. Grigorenko, E. & Sternberg, R. (1998). Dynamic test-test-ing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75–111. ing.
11. Guthke, J. & Beckmann, J. (2000). Learning test concepts and dynamic assessment. In A. Kozulin & Y. Rand (Eds.) Experience of mediated learning (pp. 175–190). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
12. Guthke, J. & Stein, H. (1996). Are learning tests the better version of intelligence tests? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 1–13.
13. Haywood, C., Brooks, P. & Burns, S. (1992). Bright Start cognitive curriculum for young children. Water-town, MA: Charles Bridge.
14. Kaniel, S., Tzuriel, D., Feuerstein, R., Ben-Schachar, N. & Eitan, T. (1991). Dynamic assessment: Learning and transfer abilities of Ethiopian immigrants to Israel. In R. Feuerstein, P. Klein & A. Tannenbaum (Eds.)(1991). Mediated learning experience: Theoretical, psychosocial, and learning implications (pp. 179–209). Tel Aviv and London: Freund.
15. Kaufman, A. & Kaufman, N. (1983). Kaufman assessment battery for children (K-ABC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
16. Klauer, J. (1993). Learning potential testing: The effect of retesting. In J. Hamers, K. Sijtsma & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.) Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp.135–152). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
17. Klauer, J. & Phye, G. (1995). Cognitive training for children: A developmental program of inductive reasoning and problem solving. Gottingen: Hogrefe.
18. Kozulin, A. (1998a). Psychological tools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Kozulin, A. (1998b) Profiles of immigrant students’ cognitive performance on Raven’s progressive matrices. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 1311–1314.
20. Kozulin, A. (1999.) Cognitive learning in younger and older immigrant students. School Psychology International, 20(2), 43–56.
21. Kozulin, A. (2000). Diversity of instrumental enrichment applications. In A. Kozulin & Y. Rand (Eds.) Experience of mediated learning (pp.257–273). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
22. Kozulin, A. (2002). Concentrated Reinforcement Lessons (CoReL) program for immigrant students from Ethiopia. Project report 2001–2002. Jerusalem: ICELP.
23. Kozulin, A. & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23. 112–127.
24. Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. & Miller, S. (Eds.)(2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Kozulin, A., Kaufman, R. & Lurie, L. (1997). Evaluation of the cognitive intervention with immigrant students from Ethiopia. In A. Kozulin (Ed.) The ontogeny of cognitive modifiability (pp.89–130). Jerusalem: ICELP.
26. Lauchan, F. & Elliott, J. (2001). The psychological assessment of learning potential. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 647–665.
27. Lidz, C. (Ed.) (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.
28. Lidz, C. & Elliott, J. (Eds.) (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. New York: Elsevier Science.
29. Resing, W. (2000). Assessing the learning potential for inductive reasoning in young children. In C. Lidz & J.Elliott (Eds.) Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp.229–262). New York: Elsevier Science.
30. Resing, W. & Roth Van der Werf (2002). Learning potential assessment and cognitive training in inductive reasoning. In G.M. van der Aalsvoort, W. Reising & A. Ruijssenaars (Eds.) Learning potential assessment and cognitive training. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
31. Shayer, M. & Beasley, F. (1987). Does instrumental enrichment work? British Educational Research Journal, 13, 101–119.
32. Sternberg, R. & Grigorenko, E. (2002). Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Tzuriel, D. (1995). The cognitive modifiability battery. Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar Ilan University.
34. Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of learning potential. In J.J.W. Andrews, D.H. Saklofke & H.L. Janzen (Eds.) Handbook of psychoeducational assessment: Ability, achievement, and behavior in children (pp.451–496). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Tzuriel, D. & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrant children in Israel. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 30, 359–380.
36. Tzuriel, D. & Klein, P. (1985). The children’s analogical reasoning modifiability test. Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar Ilan University.
37. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. edn). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Vygotsky, L. (1998). The collected works of L. Vygotsky: Vol. 5. Child psychology. New York: Plenum.
39. Zuckerman, G. (2003). The learning activity in the first years of schooling. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev & S. Miller (Eds.) Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.