The influence of tibial prosthesis design features on stresses related to aseptic loosening and stress shielding

Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 55-72

  Chong, Desmond Y R ^a   Hansen, Ulrich N ^a   Amis, Andrew A ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

component loosening; finite element modeling; stress shielding; tibial prosthesis; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956076102     PISSN: 02195194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219519410003666     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Grimm K, Mehle S, Scheltema K, Why are total knee replacement revised? - Analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry, Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:100-106, 2004. (Pubitemid 39506159)
2. Saleh KJ, Santos ER, Ghomrawi HM, Parvizi J, Mulhall KJ, Socioeconomic issues and demographics of total knee arthroplasty revision, Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:15-21, 2006. (Pubitemid 44318257)
3. Taylor M, Tanner KE, Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: a possible cause of implant migration and loosening, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79(2):181-182, 1997.
4. Carlsson AS, Gentz CF, Linder L, Localized bone resorption in the femur in mechanical failure of cemented total hip arthroplasties, Acta Orthop Scand 54(3):396-402, 1983. (Pubitemid 13053489)
5. Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C, Lotke PA, Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty - influence of stem design, J Arthroplasty 16(1):107-111, 2001. (Pubitemid 32097237)
6. Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N, Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:99-103, 2006. (Pubitemid 44318269)
7. Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A, Management of bone loss - structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:104-112, 2006. (Pubitemid 44318270)
8. Bourne RB, Finlay JB, The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:95-99, 1986. (Pubitemid 16049776)
9. Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, Hiebert R, Stuchin SA, The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty 16(6):759-767, 2001. (Pubitemid 32803643)
10. Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, Milliano MT, White SE, The effect of central stem and stem length on micromovement of the tibial tray, J Arthroplasty 7(Suppl):433-438, 1992.
11. Grewal R, Rimmer MG, Freeman MAR, Early migration of prosthesis related to long-term survivorship - comparison of tibial components in knee replacement, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 74(2):239-242, 1992.
12. Ryd L, Albrektsson BEJ, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77(3):377-383, 1995.
13. Askew MJ, Lewis JL, Analysis of model variables and fixation post length effects on stresses around a prosthesis in the proximal tibia, J Biomech Eng 103:239-245, 1981. (Pubitemid 12174212)
14. Murase K, Crowninshield RD, Pedersen DR, Chang TS, An analysis of tibial component design in total knee arthroplasty, J Biomech 16(1):13-22, 1983. (Pubitemid 13125810)
15. Vasu R, Carter DR, Schurman DJ, Beaupré GS, Epiphyseal-based designs for tibial plateau components - I. Stress analysis in the frontal plane, J Biomech 19(8):647-662, 1986.
16. Bertin KC, Freeman MAR, Samuelson KM, Ratcliffe SS, Todd RC, Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 67(2):242-248, 1985. (Pubitemid 15109878)
17. Whiteside LA, Pafford J, Load transfer characteristics of a noncemented total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res 239:168-177, 1989. (Pubitemid 19060607)
18. Au AG, Liggins AB, Raso VJ, Amirfazli A, A parametric analysis of fixation post shape in tibial knee prostheses, Med Eng Phys 27:123-134, 2005. (Pubitemid 40103510)
19. Rakotomanana RL, Leyvraz PF, Curnier A, Meister JJ, Livio JJ, Comparison of tibial fixations in total knee arthroplasty: an evaluation of stress distribution and interface micromotions, Knee 1:91-99, 1994.
20. Ramaniraka NA, Rakotomanana LR, Leyvraz PF, The fixation of the cemented femoral component - effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 82(2):297-303, 2000.
21. Arola D, Stoffel KA, Yang DT, Fatigue of the cement/bone interface: the surface texture of bone and loosening, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 76:287-297, 2006. (Pubitemid 43165386)
22. Mann KA, Miller MA, Cleary RJ, Janssen D, Verdonschot N, Experimental microme-chanics of the cement-bone interface, J Orthop Res 26:872-879, 2008.
23. Taylor M, Tanner KE, Freeman MAR, Finite element analysis of the implanted proximal tibia: a relationship between the initial cancellous bone stresses and implant migration, J Biomech 31:303-310, 1998. (Pubitemid 28322904)
24. Perillo-Marcone A, Ryd L, Johnsson K, Taylor M, A combined RSA and FE study of the implanted proximal tibia: correlation of the post-operative mechanical environment with implant migration, J Biomech 37:1205-1213, 2004. (Pubitemid 38798375)
25. Reilly DT, Burstein AH, The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue, J Biomech 8(6):393-405, 1975.
26. Goldstein SA, Wilson DL, Sonstegard DA, Matthews LS, The mechanical properties of human tibial trabecular bone as a function of metaphyseal location, J Biomech 16(12):965-969, 1983. (Pubitemid 14151720)
27. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ, Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis, J Biomech 20(11/12):1135-1150, 1987. (Pubitemid 18010111)
28. Michel MC, Guo XE, Gibson LJ, McMahon TA, Hayes WC, Compressive fatigue behavior of bovine trabecular bone, J Biomech 26(4/5):453-463, 1993. (Pubitemid 23226653)
29. Shirazi-Adl A, Ahmed AM, A parametric axisymmetric model study on the interface motions in porous-surfaced tibial implants, Ann Biomed Eng 17:411-421, 1989. (Pubitemid 19188603)
30. Barker DS, Tanner KE, Ryd L, A circumferentially flanged tibial tray minimizes bone-tray shear micromotion, Proc IMechE Part H - J Eng Med 219:449-456, 2005. (Pubitemid 41581737)
31. Bartel DL, Burstein AH, Santavicca EA, Insall JN, Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement, J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 64(7):1026-1033, 1982.
32. Au AG, Raso VJ, Liggins AB, Amirfazli A, Contribution of loading conditions and material properties to stress shielding near the tibial component of total knee replacement, J Biomech 40:1410-1416, 2007. (Pubitemid 46483452)
33. Seki T, Tashiro T, Omori G, Terashima S, Koga Y, Sakamoto M, Hara T, Takahashi EH, Microstrain on the cortex and within the bone of the distal femur with cemented and uncemented femoral components in total knee arthroplasty, Transactions of the 44th Annual Meeting Orthopaedic Research Society, pp. 699, 1998.
34. Kerner J, Huiskes R, van Lenthe GH, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B, Engh CA, Amis AA, Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodeling, J Biomech 32:695-703, 1999. (Pubitemid 29322089)
35. Bitsakos C, Kerner J, Fisher I, Amis A, The effect of muscle loading on the the simulation of bone remodeling in the proximal femur, J Biomech 38:133-139, 2005. (Pubitemid 39424987)
36. Barink M, Verdonschot N, de Waal Malefijt M, A different fixation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty may lead to preservation of femoral bone stock, Proc IMechE Part H - J Eng Med 217:325-332, 2003.
37. Rakotomanana L, The short-term and long-term behaviour of orthopaedic implant anchorage: finite element models, in Middleton J, Jones ML, Shrive NG, Pande GN (Eds.), Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering - 3, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 1-8, 2001.
38. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP, Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty - significance of radiolucent lines, Clin Orthop Relat Res 216:151-158, 1987. (Pubitemid 17040722)
39. Hsu RWW, Fan GF, Ho WP, A follow-up study of porous-coated anatomic knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty 10(1):29-36, 1995.
40. Kuster MS, Wood GA, Stachowiak GW, Gächter A, Joint load considerations in total knee replacement, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79(1):109-113, 1997.
41. Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ, On the magnitude and variability of the fatigue strength of acrylic bone cement, Int J Fatigue 22(10):855-864, 2000. (Pubitemid 32030234)
42. Parker DA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Long-term follow up of cementless versus hybrid fixation for total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:68-76, 2001. (Pubitemid 32595008)
43. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A, Selvik G, Porous coated anatomic tricompart-mental tibial components - the relationship between prosthetic position and micro-motion, Clin Orthop Relat Res 251:189-197, 1990. (Pubitemid 20088643)
44. Li MG, Nilsson KG, Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy x-ray absorptiom-etry, J Orthop Res 18(1):40-47, 2000.
45. Gioe TJ, Stroemer ES, Santos ERG, All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibias have similar outcomes at 10 years, Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:212-218, 2007.
46. Najibi S, Iorio R, Surdam JW, Whang W, Appleby D, Healy WL, All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome, J Arthroplasty 18(7 Suppl 1):9-15, 2003. (Pubitemid 37259659)
47. Rodriguez JA, Baez N, Rasquinha V, Ranawat CS, Metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components in total knee replacement, Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:174-183, 2001. (Pubitemid 33054942)
48. Weinans H, Sumner DR, Igloria R, Natarajan RN, Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models, J Biomech 33(7):809-817, 2000. (Pubitemid 30265574)