Fatigue of the cement/bone interface: The surface texture of bone and loosening

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 287-297

  Arola, D ^a   Stoffel, K A ^a   Yang, D T ^a  

^a University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Fatigue; Implant; Loosening

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC LOADS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TEXTURES;

CEMENT-BONE INTERFACES; HIP REPLACEMENTS;

BONE CEMENT;

BONE CEMENT;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; FATIGUE; FEMUR; INTERFACE PRESSURE; NONHUMAN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SHEAR STRENGTH; SHEAR STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; CATTLE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 31544450001     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30364     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Meek RM, Michos J, Grigoris P, Hamblen DL. Mid-term results and migration behaviour of a Ti-alloy cemented stem. Int Orthop 2002;26:356-360.
2. Jergesen HE, Karlen JW. Clinical outcome in total hip arthroplasty using a cemented titanium femoral prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:592-599.
3. Bauer TW, Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. II. Mechanisms of implant failure. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28:483-497.
4. Katz RP, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79B:322-326.
5. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1985;67A:517-526.
6. Berry DJ. Cemented femoral stems: what matters most. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:83-84.
7. Gardiner RC, Hozack WJ. Failure of the cement-bone interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement-prosthesis interface? J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76B:49-52.
8. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, Johnston RC. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77A: 1315-1322.
9. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Wright TM. The effect of using a plasma-sprayed stem-cement interface on stresses in a cemented femoral hip component. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1992;38:317.
10. Ramaniraka NA, Rakotomana LR, Leyvraz PF. Effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness, and roughness of the cement-bone surface. J Bone Joint Surg 2000;82B:297-303.
11. Halawa M, Lee AJ, Ling RS, Vangala SS. The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1978;92:19-30.
12. Moran JM, Greenwald AS, Matejczyk MB. Effect of gentamicin on the shear and interface strength of bone cement. Clin Orthop 1978;141:96-101.
13. Rosenstein A, MacDonald W, Iliadis A, McLardy-Smith P. Revision of cemented fixation and cemented-bone interface strength. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1992;206:47-49.
14. Wang X, Subramanian A, Dhanda R, Agrawal M. Testing of bone-biomaterial interfacial bonding strength; a comparison of different techniques. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79B:181-182.
15. Askew MJ, Steege JW, Lewis JL, Ranieri JR, Wixson RL. Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation. J Orthop Res 1984;1:412-420.
16. Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J. Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop 1982;163:290-299.
17. Majkowski RS, Bannister GC, and Miles AW. The effect of bleeding on the cement-bone interface. Clin. Orthop. 1994;299: 293-297.
18. Majkowski RS, Miles AW, Bannister GC, Perkins J, Taylor JS. Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75B:459-463.
19. Mann KA, Ayers DC, Werner FW, Nicoletta RJ, Fortino MD. Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement. J Biomech 1997;30:339-346.
20. Crowninshield RD, Jennings JD, Laurent ML, Maloney WJ. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop 1998;355:90-102.
21. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, Nivbrant, B. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998;355:103-112.
22. Mann KA, Werner FW, Ayers DC. Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension. J Biomech 1999;32:1251-1254.
23. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1996;329:326-336.
24. Bean DJ, Convery FR, Woo SLY, Lieber RL. Regional variations in shear strength of the bone-polymethylmethacrylate interface. J. Arthroplasty 1987;2:293-398.
25. Choi K, Goldstein, SA. A comparison of the fatigue behavior of human trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech 1992;25: 1371-1381.
26. Taylor M, Tanner KE. Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: A possible cause of implant migration and loosening. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79B:181-182.
27. Krause WR, Mathis RS. Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cements: Review of the literature. J. Biomed. Mater Res Appl Biomater 1988;22:338-347.
28. Lu X, Topoleski LD. A controlled-notch specimen to study fatigue crack initiation in bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:505-510.
29. Lewis G, Janna SI. Effect of fabrication pressure on the fatigue performance of Cemex XL acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2004;25:1415-1420.
30. Kim DG, Miller MA, Mann KA. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface. J Biomech. 2004;37:1505-1512.
31. Kim DG, Miller MA, Mann KA. Creep dominates tensile fatigue damage of the cement-bone interface. J Orthop Res 2004;22:633-640.
32. Gustafson MB, Martin GW, Gibson V, Storms DH, Stover SM, Gibeling J, Griffin L. Calcium buffering to maintain bone stiffness in saline solution. J. Biomech 1996;29:1191-1194.
33. Arola DD, Yang DT, Stoffel KA. The apparent volume of interdigitation: A new parameter for evaluating the influence of surface topography on mechanical interlock. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2001;58:519-524.
34. Arola D, Stoffel KA, Yang DT. Fatigue of the cement/bone interface: Surface texture and wear debris. Submitted for publication.
35. Fisher DA, Tsang AC, Paydar N, Milionis S, Turner CH. Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total hip replacement. J Biomech 1997;30:1173-1177.
36. Davies JP, Harris WH. In vitro and in vivo studies of pressurization of femoral cement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993;8:585-591.
37. Davy DT, Kotzar GM, Brown RH, Heiple KG, Goldberg VM, Heiple Jr. KG, Berilla J, Burnstein AH. Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1988;70A:45-50.
38. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001;34:859-871.
39. Morlock M, Schneider E, Bluhm A, Vollmer M, Bergmann G, Muller V, Honl M. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 2001;34:873-881.
40. Heiple KG, Shea KL, Nelson DL, Davy DT. Enhancement of the shear strength of the bone-methacrylate interface. Transactions of the 32nd Orthop. Res. Soc. Meeting; 1986. p 354.
41. Kärrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prosthesis matter? J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76B:912-917.
42. Alfaro-Adrian J, Gill HS, Murray DW. Cement migration after THR. A comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg 1999;81B:130-134.
43. Brown TD, Pedersen DR, Radin EL, Rose RM. Global mechanical consequence of reduced cement/bone coupling rigidity in proximal femoral arthroplasty: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Biomech 1988;21:115-129.
44. Walker P, Mai SF, Cobb AG, Bentley G, Hau J. Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77B:705-714.