Effect of bilateral macular scotomas from age-related macular degeneration on reach-to-grasp hand movement

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 2540-2550

  Timberlake, George T ^a,b   Omoscharka, Evanthia ^a   Quaney, Barbara M ^a,b   Grose, Susan A ^a   Maino, Joseph H ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BILATERAL MACULAR SCOTOMA; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INDEX FINGER; MONOCULAR VISION; PREFERRED RETINAL LOCUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RETINA; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SCOTOMA; THUMB; VELOCITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MACULAR DEGENERATION; MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SCOTOMA; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 79956000201     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6062     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Servos P, Goodale MA. Binocular vision and online control of human prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1994;54:121-132.
2. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38:1473-1481.
3. Bradshaw M, Elliott K. The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension. Spatial Vision. 2003;16:295-309.
4. Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res. 2004;158:317-327.
5. Rand M, Lemay M, Squire L, Shimansky Y, Stelmach G. Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res. 2007;181:447-460.
6. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M. The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1990;79:431-435.
7. Saunders JA, Knill DC. Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res. 2003;152:341-352.
8. MA-Wyatt A, McKee S. Visual information throughout a reach determines endpoint precision. Exp Brain Res. 2007;179:55-64.
9. Lee Y-L, Crabtree C, Norman J, Bingham G. Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided online. Percept Psychophys. 2008;70:1032-1046.
10. Connolly J, Goodale M. The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 125:281-286.
11. Timberlake GT, Peli E, Essock EA, Augliere RA. Reading with a macular scotoma II: Retinal locus for scanning text. Invest Ophthalmo Vis Sci. 1987;28:1268-1274.
12. Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci and macular scotoma characteristics in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005;40:303-312.
13. Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res. 1992;32:1513-1521.
14. Marotta J, Perrot T, Nicolle D, Servos P, Goodale M. Adapting to monocular vision: grasping with one eye. Exp Brain Res. 1995; 104:107-114.
15. Jackson S, Newport R, Shaw A. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reachto-grasp movements. Curr Biol. 2002;12:237-240.
16. Sivak B, MacKenzie C. Integration of visual information and motor output in reaching and grasping: the contributions of peripheral and central vision. Neuropsychologia. 1990;28:1095-1116.
17. Loftus A, Murphy S, McKenna I, Mon-Williams M. Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems. Exp Brain Res. 2004;158:328-335.
18. Kotecha A, O'Leary N, Melmoth D, Grant S, Crabb D. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:203-213.
19. Timberlake GT, Mainster MA, Webb RH, Hughes GW, Trempe CL. Retinal localization of scotomata by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982;22:91-97.
20. Timberlake GT, Sharma MK, Grose SA, et al. Retinal location of the preferred retinal locus (PRL) relative to the fovea in scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) images. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:177-186.
21. Dolman P. Tests for determining sighting of the eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1919;2:287.
22. Somers WW, Hamilton MJ. Estimation of the stereoscopic threshold utilizing perceived depth. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1984;4:245-250.
23. Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res. 1991;87:407-420.
24. Wing A, Fraser C. The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Q J Exp Psychol. 1983;35A:297-309.
25. Haggard P, Wing A. On the hand transport component of prehensile movements. J Motor Behav. 1997;29:282-287.
26. Wing A, Turton A, Fraser C. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav. 1986;18:245-260.
27. Bastian A, Martin T, Keating J, Thach W. Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. J Neuophysiol. 1996;76:492-509.
28. McCrea PH, Eng JJ. Consequences of increased neuromotor noise for reaching movements in persons with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2005;162:70-77.
29. Goodale M, Milner A, Jakobson L. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature. 1991;349: 154-156.
30. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1991;86:199-208.
31. Kudoh N, Hattori M, Numata N, Maruyama K. An analysis of spatiotemporal variability during prehension movements: effects of object size and distance. Exp Brain Res. 1997;117:457-464.
32. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav. 1984;16:235-254.
33. Marotta J, Behrmann M, Goodale M. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Exp Brain Res. 1997;116:113-121.
34. González-Alvarez C, Subramanian A, Pardhan S. Reaching and grasping with restricted peripheral vision. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2007;27:265-274.
35. Mon-Williams M, Dijkerman H. The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128:578-582.
36. Ketcham C, Seidler RD, Van Gemmert WA, et al. Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol. 2002;57B:P54-P64.
37. Subramanian A, Dickinson C. Size constancy in visual impairment: a comparison with normally sighted individuals. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2004;24:350-354.
38. Levi DM, Klein SA, Yap YL. Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Vis Res. 1987;27:581-597.
39. Carmeli E, Patish H, Coleman R. The aging hand. J Gerontol. 2003;58A:146-152.
40. Walker N, Philbin D, Fisk A. Age-related differences in movement control: adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. J Gerontol. 1997;52B:P40-P52.
41. Oliver I, Hay L, Bard C, Fleury M. Age-related differences in the reaching and grasping coordination in children: unimanual and bimanual tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2007;179:17-27.
42. Schuchard RA. Retinal correspondence and binocular perception characteristics in people with biocular central scotomas. Washington, DC: Second National Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development; 2000:90. Abstract C-68.
43. Brown LE, Halpert BA, Goodale MA. Peripheral vision for perception and action. Exp Brain Res. 2005;165:97-106.
44. Arimura E, Matsumoto C, Okuyama S et al. Quantification of metamorphopsia in a macular hole patient using M-CHARTS. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:55-59.
45. Kroyer K, Christensen U, Larsen M, la Cour M. Quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with macular hole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3741-3746.
46. Mavrakanas NA, Dang-Burgener NPL, Lorincz EN, Landis T, Safran AB. Perceptual distortion in homonymous paracentral scotomas. J Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2009;29:37-42.
47. Bulakowski P, Post R, Whitney D. Visuomotor crowding: the resolution of grasping in cluttered scenes. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009;3:1-7.
48. Mon Williams M, Tresilian J, Coppard V, Carson R. The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res. 2001;137:497-501.