Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 181, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 447-460

  Rand, Miya K ^a   Lemay, Martin ^a,b   Squire, Linda M ^a   Shimansky, Yury P ^c   Stelmach, George E ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Aperture; Coordination; Finger; Kinematics; Prehension

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; CUES; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FINGERS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34447550098     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0945-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alberts JL, Saling M, Stelmach GE (2002) Alterations in transport path differentially affect temporal and spatial movement parameters. Exp Brain Res 143:417-425
2. Bekkering H, Neggers SFW (2002) Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychol Sci 13:370-374
3. Berthier NE, Clifton RK, Gullapalli V, McCall DD, Robin D (1996) Visual information and object size in the control of reaching. J Mot Behav 28:187-197
4. Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81-89
5. Connolly JD, Goodale MA (1999) The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Exp Brain Res 125:281-286
6. Darling WG, Miller GF (1993) Transformation between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations. Exp Brain Res 93:534-547
7. Davis JH (2002) Foundations of deterministic and stochastic control. Birkhäuser, Boston
8. Gentilucci M, Toni I, Chieffi S, Pavesi G (1994) The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal participants. Exp Brain Res 99:483-500
9. Heath M, Westwood DA (2003) Can a visual representation support the online control of memory-dependent reaching? Evidence from a variable spatial mapping paradigm. Motor Control 7:346-361
10. Jackson SR, Jackson GM, Rosicky J (1995) Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics. Exp Brain Res 102:519-530
11. Jackson SR, Jones CA, Newport R, Pritchard C (1997) A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Vis Cogn 4:113-142
12. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199-208
13. Jeannerod M (1986) The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behav Brain Res 19:99-116
14. Rand MK, Shimansky Y, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR (2004) Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations. Exp Brain Res 154:50-65
15. Rand MK, Stelmach GE (2005) Effect of orienting the finger opposition space in the control of reach-to-grasp movements. J Mot Behav 37:65-78
16. Rand MK, Smiley-Oyen AL, Shimansky YP, Bloedel JR, Stelmach GE (2006a) Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res 168:131-142
17. Rand MK, Squire LM, Stelmach GE (2006b) Effect of speed manipulation on the control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 174:74-85
18. Rand MK, Squire LM, Lemay M, Shimansky YP, Stelmach GE (2006c) Effect of the presence of vision on finger closure during reach-to-grasp movements. Soc Neurosci Abstr 32:147.1
19. Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF (2002) Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance. J Neurosci 22:1426-1435
20. Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Poizner H (2003) Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping. Exp Brain Res 151:158-166
21. Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Hening W, Tunik E, Sage J, Poizner H (2006) Hand preshaping in Parkinson's disease: effects of visual feedback and medication state. Exp Brain Res 168:186-202
22. Servos P, Goodale MA (1994) Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 98:119-127
23. Servos P, Goodale MA, Jacobson LS (1992) The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res 32:1513-1521
24. Shimansky YP, Kany T, He J (2004) A novel model of motor learning capable of developing an optimal movement control law online from scratch. Biol Cybern 90:133-145
25. Sivak B, MacKenzie CL (1990) Integration of visual information and motor output in reaching and grasping: the contributions of peripheral and central vision. Neuropsychologia 28:1095-1116
26. Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M, Young D, Proteau L (1993) Determining movement onsets from temporal series. J Mot Behav 25:97-106
27. Wang J, Stelmach GE (1998) Coordination among the body segments during reach-to-grasp action involving the trunk. Exp Brain Res 123:346-350
28. Wang J, Stelmach GE (2001) Spatial and temporal control of trunk-assisted prehensile actions. Exp Brain Res 136:231-240
29. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2000) Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 38:1473-1481
30. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18:245-260
31. Winges SA, Weber DJ, Santello M (2003) The role of vision on hand preshaping during reach to grasp. Exp Brain Res 152:489-498