Structurally robust biological networks

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 5, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Blanchini, Franco ^a   Franco, Elisa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b California Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABINOSE; CYCLIC AMP;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARABINOSE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYCLIC AMP; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 79955979079     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-74     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Kitano H. Systems biology: A brief overview. Science 2002, 295(5560):1662-1664. 10.1126/science.1069492, 11872829.
2. Barkai N, Leibler S. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 1997, 387(6636):913-917. 10.1038/43199, 9202124.
3. Alon U, Surette MG, Barkai N, Leibler S. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 1999, 397(6715):168-171. 10.1038/16483, 9923680.
4. Yi TM, Huang Y, Simon MI, Doyle J. Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America 2000, 97(9):4649-4653. 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4649, 18287, 10781070.
5. Ma W, Trusina A, El-Samad H, Lim WA, Tang C. Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation. Cell 2009, 138(4):760-773. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.013, 3068210, 19703401.
6. Prill RJ, Iglesias PA, Levchenko A. Dynamic Properties of Network Motifs Contribute to Biological Network Organization. PLoS Biology 2005, 3(11):e343.. 1239925, 16187794.
7. Kwon YK, Cho KH. Quantitative analysis of robustness and fragility in biological networks based on feedback dynamics. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(7):987-994. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn060, 18285369.
8. Gómez-Gardenes J, Y M, Floría LM. On the robustness of complex heterogeneous gene expression networks. Biophysical Chemistry 2005, 115:225-229. 10.1016/j.bpc.2004.12.033, 15752609.
9. Gorban A, Radulescu O. Dynamical robustness of biological networks with hierarchical distribution of time scales. IET Systems Biology 2007, 1(4):238-246. 10.1049/iet-syb:20060083, 17708431.
10. Kartal O, Ebenhöh O. Ground State Robustness as an Evolutionary Design Principle in Signaling Networks. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(12):e8001.. 2779451, 19956601.
11. Aldana M, Cluzel P. A natural class of robust networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100(15):8710-8714. 10.1073/pnas.1536783100, 166377, 12853565.
12. Tian T. Robustness of mathematical models for biological systems. ANZIAM J 2004, 45:C565-C577.
13. Shinar G, Milo R, Rodrìguez Martìnez M, Alon U. Input-output robustness in simple bacterial signaling systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104:19931-199935.
14. Shinar G, Feinberg M. Structural Sources of Robustness in Biochemical Reaction Networks. Science 2010, 327(5971):1389-1391. 10.1126/science.1183372, 20223989.
15. Feinberg M. Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors - I. The deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems. Chemical Engineering Science 1987, 42:2229-2268.
16. Sontag E. Monotone and near-monotone biochemical networks. Systems and Synthetic Biology 2007, 1:59-87. 10.1007/s11693-007-9005-9, 2533521, 19003437.
17. Angeli D, Ferrell JE, Sontag ED. Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101(7):1822-1827. 10.1073/pnas.0308265100, 357011, 14766974.
18. Jacquez J, Simon C. Qualitative Theory of Compartmental Systems. SIAM Rev 1993, 35:43-79.
19. Abate A, Tiwari A, Sastry S. Box Invariance for biologically-inspired dynamical systems. 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA 2007, 5162-5167.
20. El-Samad H, Prajna S, Papachristodoulou A, Doyle J, Khammash M. Advanced Methods and Algorithms for Biological Networks Analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE 2006, 94(4):832-853.
21. Radde N, Bar N, Banaji M. Graphical methods for analysing feedback in biological networks - A survey. Int J Syst Sci 2010, 41:35-46.
22. Rouche N, Habets P, Laloy M. Stability theory by Liapunov's direct method 1977, 22. New York: Springer-Verlag, [Applied Mathematical Sciences, xii+396 pp. ISBN 0-387-90258-9].
23. Blanchini F. Set invariance in control - a survey. Automatica 1999, 35(11):1747-1767.
24. Blanchini F, Miani S. Set-theoretic methods in control 2008, 22. Boston: Birkhäuser, [Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications].
25. De Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. Journal of Computational Biology 2002, 9:67-103. 10.1089/10665270252833208, 11911796.
26. Alon U. An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits 2006, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
27. Nikolov S, Yankulova E, Wolkenhauer O, Petrov V. Principal difference between stability and structural stability (robustness) as used in systems biology. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci 2007, 11(4):413-433.
28. Mangan S, Zaslaver A, Alon U. The coherent feedforward loop serves as a sign-sensitive delay element in transcription networks. Journal of Molecular Biology 2003, 334:197-204. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.049, 14607112.
29. Levine E, Zhang Z, Kuhlman T, Hwa T. Quantitative Characteristics of Gene Regulation by Small RNA. PLoS Biology 2007, 5(9):e229.. 1994261, 17713988.
30. Mitarai N, J B, S K, S S, Z C, E M, Sneppen K. Dynamic features of gene expression control by small regulatory RNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106(26):10655-10659. 10.1073/pnas.0901466106, 2705582, 19541626.
31. Mehta P, Goyal S, Wingreen NS. A quantitative comparison of sRNA-based and protein-based gene regulation. Mol Syst Biol 2008, 4.
32. Williamson T, Schwartz JM, Kell DB, Stateva L. Deterministic mathematical models of the cAMP pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Systems Biology 2009, 3.
33. Jacob F, Perrin D, Sanchéz C, Monod. L'opéeron: groupe de gènes à expression coordonnée par un opérateur. J C R Acad Sci 1960, 250:1727-1729.
34. Vilar JMG, Guet C, Leibler S. Modeling network dynamics: the lac operon, a case study. Journal of Cell Biology 2003, 161(3):471-476. 10.1083/jcb.200301125, 2172934, 12743100.
35. Yildirim N, Mackey M. Feedback Regulation in the Lactose Operon: A Mathematical Modeling Study and Comparison with Experimental Data. Biophysical Journal 2003, 84(5):2841-2851. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)70013-7, 1302849, 12719218.
36. Yildirim N, Santillan M, Horike D, Mackey M. Dynamics and bistability in a reduced model of the lac operon. Chaos 2004, 14(2):279-292. 10.1063/1.1689451, 15189056.
37. Huang CYF, Ferrell JJ. Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America 1996, 93:10078-10083. 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10078, 38339, 8816754.
38. Ferrell J, James E, Machleder EM. The Biochemical Basis of an All-or-None Cell Fate Switch in Xenopus Oocytes. Science 1998, 280(5365):895-898. 10.1126/science.280.5365.895, 9572732.
39. Markevich NI, Hoek JB, Kholodenko BN. Signaling switches and bistability arising from multisite phosphorylation in protein kinase cascades. J Cell Biol 2004, 164(3):353-359. 10.1083/jcb.200308060, 2172246, 14744999.
40. Qiao L, Nachbar RB, Kevrekidis IG, Shvartsman SY. Bistability and Oscillations in the Huang-Ferrell Model of MAPK Signaling. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3(9):e184..
41. Ferrell JE, Pomerening JR, Kim SY, Trunnell NB, Xiong W, Huang CYF, Machleder EM. Simple, realistic models of complex biological processes: Positive feedback and bistability in a cell fate switch and a cell cycle oscillator. FEBS letters 2009, 583(24):3999-4005. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.068, 19878681.
42. Russo C, Giuraniuc C, Blossey R, Bodart JF. On the equilibria of the MAPK cascade: Cooperativity, modularity and bistability. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2009, 388(24):5070-5080.