Attention and the right-ear advantage: What is the connection?

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 263-275

  Hiscock, Merrill ^a   Kinsbourne, Marcel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Attention; Auditory; Dichotic listening; Laterality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; CALLOSAL RELAY MODEL; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IVRY AND ROBERTSON MODEL; KIMURA MODEL; KINSBOURNE ATTENTIONAL MODEL; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROTRANSMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SAMPLING ERROR; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND TRANSMISSION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VERBALIZATION;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS;

EID: 79955972624     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (199)

1. Allport A. Visual attention. Foundations of cognitive science 1989, 631-682. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.I. Posner (Ed.).
2. Andersson B., Hugdahl K. Effects of sex, age, and forced attention on dichotic listening in children: A longitudinal study. Developmental Neuropsychology 1987, 3:191-206.
3. Andersson M., Llera J.E., Rimol L.M., Hugdahl K. Using dichotic listening to study bottom-up and top-down processing in children and adults. Child Neuropsychology 2008, 14:470-479.
4. Andersson M., Reinvang I., Wehling E., Hugdahl K., Lundervold A.J. A dichotic listening study of attention control in older adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2008, 49:299-304.
5. Annett M. Handedness and brain asymmetry: The right shift theory 2002, Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
6. Asbjørnsen A.E., Bryden M.P. Biased attention and the fused dichotic words test. Neuropsychologia 1996, 14:407-411.
7. Asbjørnsen A.E., Hugdahl K. Attentional effects in dichotic listening. Brain and Language 1995, 49:189-201.
8. Asbjørnsen A.E., Hugdahl K., Hynd G.W. The effects of head and eye turns on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain and Language 1990, 39:447-458.
9. Bartholomeus B. Effects of task requirements on ear superiority for sung speech. Cortex 1974, 10:215-223.
10. Bentin S., Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:54-67.
11. Best C.T., Avery R.A. Left-hemisphere advantage for click consonants is determined by linguistic significance and experience. Psychological Science 1999, 10:65-70.
12. Bilger R.C., Matthies M.L., Hammel D.R., Demorest M.E. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990, 33:418-432.
13. Binder J.R., Frost J.A., Hammeke T.A., Bellgowan P.S.F., Springer J.A., Kaufman J.N., et al. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 10:512-528.
14. Bloch M.I., Hellige J.B. Stimulus intensity, attentional instructions, and the ear advantage during dichotic listening. Brain and Cognition 1989, 9:136-148.
15. Blumstein S., Goodglass H., Tartter V. The reliability of ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain and Language 1975, 2:226-236.
16. Boliek C.A., Obrzut J.E., Shaw D. The effects of hemispatial and asymmetrically focused attention on dichotic listening with normal and learning-disabled children. Neuropsychologia 1988, 26:417-433.
17. Brancucci A., Babiloni C., Babiloni F., Galderisi S., Mucci A., Tecchio F., et al. Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: Evidence from magnetoencephalography. European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 19:2329-2336.
18. Broadbent D.E. Failures of attention in selective listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952, 44:428-433.
19. Broadbent D.E. Listening to one of two synchronous messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952, 44:51-55.
20. Broadbent D.E. Speaking and listening simultaneously. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952, 43:267-273.
21. Broadbent D.E. Perception and communication 1958, Pergamon, London.
22. Bryden M.P. Order of report in dichotic listening. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1962, 16:291-299.
23. Bryden M.P. Attentional strategies and short-term memory in dichotic listening. Cognitive Psychology 1971, 2:99-116.
24. Bryden M.P. Response bias and hemispheric differences in dot localization. Perception & Psychophysics 1976, 19:23-28.
25. Bryden M.P. An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research 1988, 1-43. Wiley, Chichester, UK. K. Hugdahl (Ed.).
26. Bryden M.P., MacRae L. Dichotic laterality effects obtained with emotional words. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology 1988, 1:171-176.
27. Bryden M.P., Munhall K., Allard F. Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening. Brain and Language 1983, 18:236-248.
28. Bulman-Fleming M.B., Bryden M.P. Simultaneous verbal and affective laterality effects. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:787-797.
29. Carter R.L., Hohenegger M., Satz P. An inferential method for determining the mode of cerebral speech specialization. Neuropsychologia 1980, 18:569-574.
30. Celesia G.G. Organization of auditory cortical areas in man. Brain 1976, 99:403-414.
31. Cherry E.C. On the recognition of speech with one, and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1953, 25:975-979.
32. Chung D.Y., Mason K., Gannon P.R., Wilson G.N. The ear effect as a function of age and hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1983, 73:1277-1282.
33. Clarke J.M., Lufkin R.B., Zaidel E. Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performance: Individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31:547-557.
34. Connolly J.F. Stability of pathway-hemisphere differences in the auditory event-related potential (ERP) to monaural stimulation. Psychophysiology 1985, 22:87-95.
35. Cowell P., Hugdahl K. Individual differences in neurobehavioral measures of laterality and interhemispheric function as measured by dichotic listening. Developmental Neuropsychology 2000, 18:95-112.
36. Damasio H., Damasio A.R., Castro-Caldas A., Ferro J.M. Dichotic listening pattern in relation to interhemispheric disconnexion. Neuropsychologia 1976, 14:247-250.
37. Dawe S., Corballis M.C. The influence of gender, handedness and head-turn on auditory asymmetries. Neuropsychologia 1986, 24:857-862.
38. de Bode S., Sininger Y., Healy E.W., Mathern G.W., Zaidel E. Dichotic listening after cerebral hemispherectomy: Methodological and theoretical observations. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2460-2466.
39. Della Penna S., Brancucci A., Babiloni C., Franciotti R., Pizzella V., Rossi D., et al. Lateralization of dichotic speech stimuli is based on specific auditory pathway interactions: Neuromagnetic evidence. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:2303-2311.
40. Deutsch D. An auditory illusion. Nature 1974, 251:307-309.
41. Deutsch J.A., Deutsch D. Comments on selective attention: Perception or response?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1967, 19:362-363.
42. Dos Santos Sequeira S., Specht K., Hämäläinen H., Hugdahl K. The effects of different intensity levels of background noise on dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2008, 49:305-310.
43. Egeth H.E. Dichotic listening: Long-lived echoes of Broadbent's early studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:124.
44. Engle R.W. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:19-23.
45. Finger S. Origins of neuroscience: A history of explorations into brain function 1994, Oxford University Press, New York.
46. Freides D. Do dichotic listening procedures measure lateralization of information processing or retrieval strategy?. Perception & Psychophysics 1977, 21:259-263.
47. Gadea M., Gomez C., Espert R. Test-retest performance for the consonant-vowel dichotic listening test with and without attentional manipulations. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2000, 22:793-803.
48. Geffen G. Development of hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Cortex 1976, 12:337-346.
49. Geffen G. The development of the right ear advantage in dichotic listening with focused attention. Cortex 1978, 14:169-177.
50. Geffen G., Caudrey D. Reliability and validity of the dichotic monitoring test for language laterality. Neuropsychologia 1981, 19:413-423.
51. Geffen G., Quinn K. Hemispheric specialization and ear advantages in processing speech. Psychological Bulletin 1984, 96:273-291.
52. Geffen G., Traub E., Stierman I. Language laterality assessed by unilateral ECT and dichotic monitoring. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1978, 41:354-360.
53. Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Brain 1965, 88(237-294):585-644.
54. Glendenning K.K., Baker B.N., Hutson K.A., Masterton R.B. Acoustic chiasm V: Inhibition and excitation in the ipsilateral and contralateral projections of LSO. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1992, 319:100-122.
55. Gopher D. Eye-movement patterns in selective listening tasks of focused attention. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 14:259-264.
56. Grimshaw G.M. Integration and interference in the cerebral hemispheres: Relations with hemispheric specialization. Brain and Cognition 1998, 36:108-127.
57. Hall J.L., Goldstein M.H. Representation of binaural stimuli by single units in primary auditory cortex of unanesthetized cats. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1968, 113(2):456-461.
58. Halwes T. User's guide for the fused dichotic words test 1991, Precision Neurometrics, New Haven, CT.
59. Hauser M.D., Agnetta B., Perez C. Orienting asymmetries in rhesus monkeys: The effect of time-domain changes in acoustic perception. Animal Behavior 1998, 56:41-47.
60. Hauser M.D., Andersson K. Left hemisphere dominance for processing vocalizations in adult, but not infant, rhesus monkeys: Field experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1994, 91:3946-3948.
61. Henry R.G.J. Monaural studies eliciting an hemispheric asymmetry: A bibliography. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1979, 48:335-338.
62. Henry R.G.J. Monaural studies eliciting an hemispheric asymmetry: A bibliography: II. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1983, 56:915-918.
63. Hiscock M., Beckie J.L. Overcoming the right-ear advantage: A study of focused attention in children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1993, 15:754-772.
64. Hiscock M., Bergstrom K.J. The lengthy persistence of priming effects in dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia 1982, 20:43-53.
65. Hiscock M., Chipuer H. Children's ability to shift attention from one ear to the other: Divergent results for dichotic and monaural stimuli. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31:1339-1350.
66. Hiscock M., Cole L.C., Benthall J.G., Carlson V.L., Ricketts J.M. Toward solving the inferential problems in laterality research: Effects of increased reliability on the validity of the dichotic listening right-ear advantage. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2000, 6:539-547.
67. Hiscock M., Hampson E., Wong S.C.P., Kinsbourne M. Effects of eye movements on the recognition and localization of dichotic stimuli. Brain and Cognition 1985, 4:140-155.
68. Hiscock M., Inch R., Ewing C.T. Constant and variable aspects of the dichotic listening right-ear advantage: A comparison of standard and signal detection tasks. Laterality 2005, 10:517-534.
69. Hiscock M., Inch R., Kinsbourne M. Allocation of attention in dichotic listening: Differential effects on the detection and localization of signals. Neuropsychology 1999, 13:404-414.
70. Hiscock M., Inch R., Kinsbourne M. Allocation of attention in dichotic listening: Effects on the detection and localization of targets within lists. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1999, 21:265-278.
71. Hiscock M., Kinsbourne M. Selective listening asymmetry in preschool children. Developmental Psychology 1977, 13:217-224.
72. Hiscock M., Kinsbourne M. Asymmetries of selective listening and attention switching in children. Developmental Psychology 1980, 16:70-82.
73. Hiscock M., Kinsbourne M. Specialization of the cerebral hemispheres: Implications for learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1987, 20:130-143.
74. Hiscock M., Kinsbourne M., Caplan B., Swanson J.M. Auditory attention in hyperactive children: Effects of stimulant medication on dichotic listening performance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1979, 88:27-32.
75. Hiscock M., Lin J., Kinsbourne M. Shifts in children's ear asymmetry during verbal and nonverbal auditory-visual association tasks: A "virtual stimulus" effect. Cortex 1996, 32:367-374.
76. Hiscock M., Stewart C. The effect of asymmetrically focused attention upon subsequent ear differences in dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia 1984, 22:337-351.
77. Hublet C., Morais J., Bertelson P. Spatial constraints on focused attention: Beyond the right-side advantage. Perception 1976, 5:3-8.
78. Hugdahl K., Andersson L. The "forced-attention paradigm" in dichotic listening to CV-syllables: A comparison between adults and children. Cortex 1986, 22:417-432.
79. Hugdahl K., Andersson B. Dichotic listening and reading acquisition in children: A one-year follow-up. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1987, 9:631-649.
80. Hugdahl K., Bronnick K., Law I., Kyllingsbaek S., Paulson O.B. Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instruments stimuli: A 15O-PET study. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:431-440.
81. Hugdahl K., Carlsson G., Eichele T. Age effects in dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables: Interactions with attention. Developmental Neuropsychology 2001, 20:449-457.
82. Hugdahl K., Carlsson G., Uvebrant P., Lundervold A.J. Dichotic-listening performance and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents. Archives of Neurology 1997, 54:1494-1500.
83. Hugdahl K., Ek M., Takio F., Rintee T., Tuomainen J., Haarala C., et al. Blind individuals show enhanced perceptual and attentional sensitivity for identification of speech sounds. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 19:28-32.
84. Hugdahl K., Hammar Å. Test-retest reliability for the consonant-vowel syllables dichotic listening paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1997, 19:667-675.
85. Hugdahl K., Rund B.R., Lund A., Asbjørnsen A., Egeland J., Landrø N.I., et al. Attentional and executive dysfunctions in schizophrenia and depression: Evidence from dichotic listening performance. Biological Psychiatry 2003, 53:609-616.
86. Hugdahl K., Westerhausen R., Alho K., Medvedev S., Laine M., Hämäläinen H. Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2009, 50:11-22.
87. Inglis J. Dichotic stimulation, temporal-lobe damage, and the perception and storage of auditory stimuli - A note on Kimura's findings. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1962, 16:11-17.
88. Inglis J. On the relative effects of different sources of variation in dichotic listening performance. British Journal of Psychology 1968, 59:415-422.
89. Inglis J., Sykes D.H. Some sources of variation in dichotic listening performance in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1967, 5:480-488.
90. Ivry R., Lebby P. Hemispheric differences in auditory perception are similar to those found in visual perception. Psychological Science 1993, 4:41-45.
91. Ivry R.B., Robertson L.C. The two sides of perception 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
92. Jacquin-Courtois S., Rode G., Pavani F., O'Shea J., Giard M.H., Boisson D., et al. Effect of prism adaptation on left dichotic listening deficit in neglect patients: Glasses to hear better?. Brain 2010, 133:895-908.
93. Jäncke L. Hemispheric priming affects right-ear advantage in dichotic listening. International Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 74:71-77.
94. Jäncke L., Buchanan T.W., Lutz K., Shah N.J. Focused and nonfocused attention in verbal and emotional dichotic listening: An FMRI study. Brain and Language 2001, 78:349-363.
95. Jäncke L., Wüsterberg T., Scheich H., Heinze H.J. Phonetic perception and the temporal cortex. Neuroimage 2002, 15:733-746.
96. Johnson P.R. Dichotically-stimulated ear differences in musicians and nonmusicians. Cortex 1977, 13:385-389.
97. Kannan P.M., Lipscomb D.M. Bilateral hearing asymmetry in a large population. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1974, 55:1092-1094.
98. Katsuki J., Speaks C., Penner S., Bilger R.C. Application of theory of signal detection to dichotic listening. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984, 27:444-448.
99. Kershner J.R., Morton L.L. Directed attention dichotic listening in reading disabled children: A test of four models of maladaptive lateralization. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28:181-198.
100. Khalfa S., Micheyl C., Veuillet E., Collet L. Peripheral auditory lateralization assessment using TEOAEs. Hearing Research 1998, 121:29-34.
101. Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1961, 15:166-171.
102. Kimura D. Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1961, 15:156-165.
103. Kimura D. Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1964, 16:355-358.
104. Kimura D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 1967, 3:163-168.
105. Kimura D. The asymmetry of the human brain. Scientific American 1973, 228:70-78.
106. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica 1970, 33:193-201.
107. Kinsbourne M. Eye and head turning indicates cerebral lateralization. Science 1972, 176:539-541.
108. Kinsbourne M. The control of attention by interaction between the cerebral hemispheres. Attention and performance IV 1973, 239-255. Academic Press, New York. S. Kornblum (Ed.).
109. Kinsbourne M. The mechanism of hemispheric control of the lateral gradient of attention. Attention and performance V 1975, 81-97. Academic Press, London. P.M.A. Rabbitt, S. Dornic (Eds.).
110. Kinsbourne M. Dichotic imbalance due to isolated hemisphere occlusion or directional rivalry?. Brain and Language 1980, 11:221-224.
111. Knecht S., Dräger B., Deppe M., Bobe L., Lohmann H., Flöel A., et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000, 123:2512-2518.
112. Kolb B., Whishaw I.Q. Fundamentals of human neuropsychology 2003, Worth Publishers, New York. 5th ed.
113. Kraft R.H. Laterality and school achievement: Interactions between familial handedness and assessed laterality. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1985, 61:1147-1156.
114. Lachner N., Hiscock M. Effect of high-and low-frequency noise on the perception of words presented in dichotic competition 2010, International Neuropsychological Society, Acapulco, Mexico.
115. Loring D.W., Meador K.J., Lee G.P., Murro A.M., Smith J.R., Flanigin H.F., et al. Cerebral language lateralization: Evidence from intracarotid amobarbital testing. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28:831-838.
116. McFadden D. A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research 1993, 68:143-151.
117. Milberg W.P., Whitman R.D., Rourke D., Glaros A.G. Role of subvocal motor activity in dichotic speech perception and selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:231-239.
118. Milner B., Taylor L., Sperry R.W. Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science 1968, 161:184-186.
119. Moncrieff D., Black J. Dichotic listening deficits in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia 2008, 41:54-75.
120. Moncrieff D., Jerger J., Wambacq I., Greenwald R., Black J. ERP evidence of a dichotic left-ear deficit in some dyslexic children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2004, 15:518-534.
121. Moncrieff D., McColl R.W., Black J.R. Hemodynamic differences in children with dichotic listening deficits: Preliminary results from an fMRI study during a cued listening task. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2008, 19:33-45.
122. Moncrieff D.W., Musiek F.E. Interaural asymmetries revealed by dichotic listening tests in normal and dyslexic children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2002, 13:428-437.
123. Moncrieff D.W., Wertz D. Auditory rehabilitation for interaural asymmetry: Preliminary evidence of improved dichotic listening performance following intensive training. International Journal of Audiology 2008, 47:84-97.
124. Mondor T.A. Interaction between handedness and the attentional bias during tests of dichotic listening performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1994, 16:377-385.
125. Mondor T.A., Bryden M.P. The influence of attention on the dichotic REA. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29:1179-1190.
126. Mondor T.A., Bryden M.P. Auditory perceptual asymmetries: A function of the distribution of auditory spatial attention. Perception and Psychophysics 1992, 52:353-402.
127. Mondor T.A., Bryden M.P. Orienting of auditory spatial attention: Effects of a lateralized tone cue. Neuropsychologia 1992, 30:743-752.
128. Mononen L.J., Seitz M.R. An AER analysis of contralateral advantage in the transmission of auditory information. Neuropsychologia 1977, 15:165-173.
129. Morais J. The effects of ventriloquism on the right-side advantage for verbal material. Cognition 1975, 3:127-139.
130. Morais J., Bertelson P. Laterality effects in diotic listening. Perception 1973, 2:107-111.
131. Morais J., Bertelson P. Spatial position versus ear of entry as determinant of the auditory laterality effects: A stereophonic test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1975, 104:253-262.
132. Morais J., Darwin C.J. Ear differences for same-different reaction times to monaurally presented speech. Brain and Language 1974, 1:383-390.
133. Morais J., Landercy M. Listening to speech while retaining music: What happens to the right-ear advantage?. Brain and Language 1977, 4:295-308.
134. Moray N. Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1959, 11:56-60.
135. Mount R., Resnick J.S., Kagan J., Hiatt S., Szpak M. Direction of gaze and emergence of speech in the second year. Brain and Language 1989, 36:406-410.
136. Obrzut J.E., Boliek C.A., Obrzut A. The effect of stimulus type and directed attention on dichotic listening with children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1986, 41:198-209.
137. Papcun G., Krashen S., Terbeek D., Remington R., Harshman R. Is the left hemisphere specialized for speech, language and/or something else?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1974, 55:319-327.
138. Pashler H.E. The psychology of attention 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
139. Pavani F., Làdavas E., Driver J. Gaze direction modulates auditory spatial deficits in stroke patients with neglect. Cortex 2005, 41:181-188.
140. Perl N., Haggard M. Practice and strategy in a measure of cerebral dominance. Neuropsychologia 1975, 13:347-352.
141. Pizzamiglio L., De Pascalis C., Vignati A. Stability of dichotic listening test. Cortex 1974, 10:203-205.
142. Pollmann S. A unified structural-attentional framework for dichotic listening. The two halves of the brain: Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres 2010, 441-468. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. K. Hugdahl, R. Westerhausen (Eds.).
143. Pollmann S., Maertens M., von Cramon D.Y., Lepsien J., Hugdahl K. Dichotic listening in patients with splenial and nonsplenial callosal lesions. Neuropsychology 2002, 16:56-64.
144. Rasmussen T., Milner B. Clinical and surgical studies of the cerebral speech areas in man. Cerebral localization 1977, 238-255. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. K.J. Zülch, O. Creutzfeld, G.C. Galbraith (Eds.).
145. Reynolds D. Effects of double stimulation: Temporary inhibition of response. Psychological Bulletin 1964, 62:333-347.
146. Rosenzweig M.R. Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex. American Journal of Psychology 1951, 167:147-158.
147. Ryan W.J., McNeil M. Listener reliability for a dichotic task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1974, 56:1922-1923.
148. Sætrevik B. The influence of visual information on auditory lateralization. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2010, 51:290-293.
149. Sætrevik B., Hugdahl K. Endogenous and exogenous control of attention in dichotic listening. Neuropsychology 2007, 21:285-290.
150. Sætrevik B., Hugdahl K. Priming inhibits the right ear advantage in dichotic listening: Implications for auditory laterality. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:282-287.
151. Sandmann P., Eichele T., Specht K., Jäncke L., Rimol L.M., Nordby H., et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in the processing of temporal acoustic cues in consonant-vowel syllables. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2007, 25:227-240.
152. Sergent J. The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8:253-272.
153. Sergent J. Music, the brain and Ravel. Trends in Neuroscience 1993, 16:168-172.
154. Sexton M.A., Geffen G. Development of three strategies of attention in dichotic monitoring. Developmental Psychology 1979, 15:299-310.
155. Sherrington C.S. Man on his nature 1940, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
156. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977, 84:127-190.
157. Sidtis J.J. On the nature of the cortical function underlying right hemisphere auditory perception. Neuropsychologia 1980, 18:321-330.
158. Sidtis J.J. Dichotic listening after commissurotomy. Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, method and research 1988, 161-184. Wiley, Chichester, UK. K. Hugdahl (Ed.).
159. Sidtis J.J., Bryden M.P. Asymmetrical perception of language and music: Evidence for independent processing strategies. Neuropsychologia 1978, 16:627-632.
160. Sinai A., Pratt H. High-resolution time course of hemispheric dominance revealed by low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Clinical Neurophysiology 2003, 114:1181-1188.
161. Sininger Y.S., Cone-Wesson B. Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization. Science 2004, 305:1581.
162. Sininger Y.S., Cone-Wesson B. Lateral asymmetry in the ABR of neonates: Evidence and mechanisms. Hearing Research 2006, 212:203-211.
163. Sparks R., Geschwind N. Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures. Cortex 1968, 4:3-16.
164. Speaks C.E. Statistical properties of dichotic listening scores. Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research 1988, 185-213. Wiley, Chichester, UK. K. Hugdahl (Ed.).
165. Speaks C., Niccum N. Variability of the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Journal of the Audiology Society 1977, 3(1):52-57.
166. Spellacy F., Blumstein S. The influence of language set on ear preference in phoneme recognition. Cortex 1970, 6:430-439.
167. Springer S.P., Deutsch G. Left brain, right brain: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience 1997, Freeman, New York. 5th ed.
168. Springer S.P., Gazzaniga M.S. Dichotic testing of partial and complete split-brain subjects. Neuropsychologia 1975, 13:341-346.
169. Studdert-Kennedy M. Two questions. Brain and Language 1975, 2:123-130.
170. Studdert-Kennedy M., Shankweiler D.P. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1970, 48:579-594.
171. Tallus J., Hugdahl K., Alho K., Medvedev S., Hämäläinen H. Interaural intensity difference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Brain Research 2007, 1185:195-200.
172. Techentin C., Voyer D. Congruency, attentional set, and laterality effects with emotional words. Neuropsychology 2007, 21:646-655.
173. Techentin C., Voyer D., Klein R.M. Between- and within-ear congruency and laterality effects in an auditory semantic/emotional prosody conflict task. Brain and Cognition 2009, 70:201-208.
174. Teng E.L. Dichotic ear difference is a poor index for the functional asymmetry between the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 1981, 19:235-240.
175. Teufel C., Ghanzanfar A.A., Fischer J. On the relationship between lateralized brain function and orienting asymmetries. Behavioral Neuroscience 2010, 124:437-445.
176. Thomsen T., Rimol L.M., Ersland L., Hugdahl K. Dichotic listening reveals functional specificity in prefrontal cortex: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 2004, 21:211-218.
177. Treisman A.M. Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1960, 12:242-248.
178. Treisman A., Geffen G. Selective attention and cerebral dominance in perceiving and responding to speech messages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 20:139-150.
179. Van Lancker D., Fromkin V.A. Hemispheric specialization for pitch and "tone": Evidence from Thai. Journal of Phonetics 1973, 1:101-109.
180. Voyer D. Reliability and magnitude of perceptual asymmetries in a dichotic word recognition task. Neuropsychology 2003, 17:393-401.
181. Voyer D. Reliability and magnitude of laterality effects in dichotic listening with exogenous cueing. Brain and Cognition 2004, 55:495-496.
182. Voyer D., Flight J.I. Reliability and magnitude of auditory laterality effects: The influence of attention. Brain and Cognition 2001, 46:397-413.
183. Voyer D., Ingram J.D. Attention, reliability, and validity of perceptual asymmetries in the fused dichotic words test. Laterality 2005, 10:545-561.
184. Voyer D., Szeligo F., Russell N.L. Dichotic target detection with words: A modified procedure. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2005, 27:400-411.
185. Voyer D., Techentin C. Dichotic listening with consonant-vowel pairs: The role of place of articulation and stimulus dominance. Journal of Phonetics 2009, 37:162-172.
186. Wang Y., Behne D.M., Jongman A., Sereno J.A. The role of linguistic experience in the hemispheric processing of lexical tone. Applied Psycholinguistics 2004, 25:449-466.
187. Wang Y., Jongman A., Sereno J.A. Dichotic perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese and American listeners. Brain and Language 2001, 78:332-348.
188. Wester K., Hugdahl K., Asbjørnsen A. Dichotic listening during forced-attention in a patient with left hemispherectomy. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1991, 72:151-159.
189. Westerhausen R., Hugdahl K. The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: A review of clinical and experimental evidence. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2008, 32:1044-1054.
190. Westerhausen R., Hugdahl K. Cognitive control of auditory laterality. The two halves of the brain: Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres 2010, 469-498. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. K. Hugdahl, R. Westerhausen (Eds.).
191. Westerhausen R., Moosmann M., Alho K., Medvedev S., Hämäläinen H., Hugdahl K. Top-down and bottom-up interaction: Manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantage. Brain Research 2009, 1250:183-189.
192. Westerhausen R., Woerner W., Kreuder F., Schweiger E., Hugdahl K., Wittling W. The role of the corpus callosum in dichotic listening: A combined morphological and diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuropsychology 2006, 20:272-279.
193. Wexler B.E., Halwes T. Increasing the power of dichotic methods: The fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia 1983, 21:59-66.
194. Wiens S., Emmerich D.S. Synthetic stimuli attenuate the effect of attention on the dichotic right-ear advantage. Acta Psychologica 1999, 102:13-19.
195. Wolpaw J.R., Penry J.K. Hemispheric differences in the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1977, 43:99-102.
196. Wood N.L., Cowan N. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:243-262.
197. Wood S., Hiscock M., Widrig M. Selective attention fails to alter the dichotic listening lag effect: Evidence that the lag effect is preattentional. Brain and Language 2000, 71:373-390.
198. Zaidel E. Hemispheric independence and interaction in word recognition. Brain and reading 1989, 77-97. McMillan, Hampshire, UK. C. von Euler, I. Lundberg, G. Lennerstrand (Eds.).
199. Zatorre R.J. Perceptual asymmetry on the dichotic fused words test and cerebral speech lateralization determined by the carotid sodium amytal test. Neuropsychologia 1989, 27:1207-1219.