Dichotic listening after cerebral hemispherectomy: Methodological and theoretical observations

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2461-2466

  de Bode, Stella ^a,b   Sininger, Yvonne ^b   Healy, Eric W ^a   Mathern, Gary W ^b,c   Zaidel, Eran ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dichotic listening; Hemispherectomy; Ipsilateral suppression; Laterality indices

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BRAIN SURGERY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; EAR; FEMALE; HEARING ACUITY; HEMISPHERE; HEMISPHERECTOMY; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE TEST; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPLIT HALF CORRELATION; THEORETICAL STUDY; VOWEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; HEMISPHERECTOMY; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 34250617899     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.026     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ANSI, American National Standards Institute. Available at: www.ansi.org.
2. Berlin C.I., and McNeil M. Dichotic listening. In: Lass N.J. (Ed). Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. (1976), Academic Press, New York
3. Brizzolara D., Pecini C., Brovedani P., Ferretti G., Cipriani P., and Cioni G. Timing and type of congenital brain lesion determine different patterns of language lateralization in hemiplegic children. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 620-632
4. Bryden M.P., and Sprott D.A. Statistical determination of degree of laterality. Neuropsychologia 19 4 (1981) 571-581
5. Cook S.W., Nguyen S.T., Hu B., Yudovin S., Shields W.D., Vinters H.V., et al. Cerebral hemispherectomy in pediatric patients with epilepsy: comparison of three techniques by pathological substrate in 115 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery 100 2 Suppl Pediatrics (2004) 125-141
6. Damasio A.R., Lima P.A., and Damasio H. Nervous function after right hemispherectomy. Neurology 25 (1975) 89-93
7. Di Stefano M., Salvadori C., Fiaschi E., and Viti M. Speech lateralization in callosal agenesis assessed by the dichotic fused words test. Laterality 3 2 (1998) 131-142
8. Dunn, L. (1981). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT). Circle Pines. Minnesota: American Guidance Service.
9. Fernandes M.A., and Smith M.L. Comparing the fused dichotic words test and the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in children with epilepsy. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 1216-1228
10. Geffen G.M. Phonological fusion after partial section of the corpus callosum. Neuropsychologia 18 (1980) 613-620
11. Isaacs E., Chrisie D., Vargha-Khadem F., and Mishkin M. Effects of hemispheric side of injury, age at injury, and presence of seizure disorder on functional ear and hand asymmetries in hemiplegic children. Neuropsychologia 34 2 (1996) 127-137
12. Jonas R., Nguyen S., Hu B., Asarnow R.F., LoPresti C., Curtiss S., et al. Cerebral hemispherectomy: hospital course, seizure, developmental, language, and motor outcomes. Neurology (2004) 8
13. Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology 15 (1961) 166-171
14. Kimura D. Speech lateralization in young children as determined by an auditory test. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology 56 (1963) 899-902
15. Kinsbourne M. The mechanism of hemispheric control of the lateral gradient of attention. In: Rabbit P.M.A., and Dornic S. (Eds). Attention and performance vol. V (1975), Academic Press, New York
16. Korkman M., and von Wendt L. Evidence of altered dominance in children with congenital spastic hemiplegia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1 (1995) 261-270
17. Liasis A., Boyd S., Rivera-Gaxiola M., and Towell A. Speech and non-speech processing in hemispherectomized children: an event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research 17 (2003) 665-673
18. Nass R., Sadler A.E., and Sidtis J.J. Differential effects of congenital versus acquired unilateral brain injury on dichotic listening performance: evidence for sparing and asymmetric crowding. Neurology 42 (1992) 1960-1965
19. Netley C. Dichotic listening performance of hemispherectomized patients. Neuropsychologia 10 (1972) 233-240
20. Wester K., Hugdahl K., and Asbjornsen A. Dichotic listening during forced-attention in a patient with left hemispherectomy. Perceptual Motor Skills 72 1 (1991) 151-159
21. Wexler B.E., and Halwes T. Increasing the power of dichotic methods: The fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia 21 (1983) 59-66
22. Wexler B.E., and Halwes T. Dichotic listening tests in studying brain-behavior relationships. Neuropsychologia 23 4 (1985) 545-559
23. Woods B.T. Dichotic listening ear preference after childhood cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia 3 (1984) 303-310
24. Zaidel E. Auditory language comprehension in the right hemisphere following cerebral commisorotomy and hemispherectomy: a comparison with child language and aphasia. In: Caramazza A., and Zuriff E.B. (Eds). Language organization and language breakdown: parallels and divergences (1978), Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore 229-275
25. Zaidel, E. (1979a). On measuring hemispheric specialization in man. Paper presented at the NATO-ASI, Paris.
26. Zaidel E. The split and half brains as models of congenital language disability. In: Ludlow C.I., and Doran-Quine M.E. (Eds). The neurological bases of language disorders in children: methods and directions for research (1979), US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 55-89
27. Zaidel E. Disconnection syndrome as a model for laterality effects on the normal brain. In: Hellige J. (Ed). Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry (1983), Praeger Publishers, New York 95-151