Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 317-323

  Cinotti, Gianluca ^a   Lucioli, Niccolò ^a   Malagoli, Andrea ^b   Calderoli, Carlo ^b   Cassese, Ferdinando ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b DTM Technologies   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADDUCTION; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FEMUR HEAD; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RISK REDUCTION; ROTATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DISLOCATIONS; FEMUR HEAD; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 79955947611     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-0954-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2005) Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2456-2463 (Pubitemid 41546376)
2. Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM (1998) Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:163-170 (Pubitemid 28538112)
3. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1788-1792 (Pubitemid 35176471)
4. Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ et al (2005) Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. An in vitro study. J Arthroplasty 20:11-19 (Pubitemid 40127098)
5. Peters CL, McPherson E, Jackson JD, Erickson A (2007) Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:140-144 (Pubitemid 47333022)
6. Johnston RC, Smidt GL (1970) Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. Clin Orthop Relat Res 72:205-215
7. Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM (1998) Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:163-170 (Pubitemid 28538112)
8. Beaulé PE, Schmalzried TP, Udomkiat P, Amstutz HC (2002) Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone J Surg Am 84(2):256-263 (Pubitemid 37127487)
9. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2006) Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty with 36- and 40-mm femoral heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:153-155 (Pubitemid 44900975)
10. Dorr LD, Wolf AW, Chandler R, Conaty JP (1983) Classification and treatment of dislocations of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:151-158
11. McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:159-170
12. Ritter MA (1976) Dislocation and subluxation of the total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:92-94
13. Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1295-1306 (Pubitemid 13169598)
14. Matsushita I, Morita Y, Ito Y, Gejo R, Kimura T (2009) Activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty. Is a 32-mm femoral head superior to a 26-mm head for improving daily activities? Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-009- 0909-8
15. D'Lima DD, Urouhart AG, Buehhler KO et al (2000) The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral component on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:315-321 (Pubitemid 30140332)
16. Bartz R, Noble PC, Kadakia NR, Tullos HS (2000) The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone J Surg Am 82:1300-1307
17. Widemar K-H (2007) Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S29-S33
18. Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH et al (2004) Biomechanics of large femoral heads. Clin Orthop Rel Res 429:102-107
19. Usrey MM, Noble PC, Rudner LJ, Conditt MA, Birman MV, Santore RF, Mathis KB (2006) Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular- weight polyethylene liners? J Arthroplasty 21(6 Suppl 2):65-71
20. Yamaguchi M, Akisue T, Bauer TW, Hashimoto Y (2000) The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:305-313 (Pubitemid 30208347)
21. Barrack RL, Butler RA, Laster DR, Andrews P (2001) Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling. J Arthroplasty 16(8 Suppl 1):8-12 (Pubitemid 33151040)
22. Earll M, Fehring T, Griffin WL, Mason JB, McCoy TH (2004) Early osteolysis associated with trunion-liner impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:153-156 (Pubitemid 38140437)
23. Padgett DE, Lipman J, Robie B, Nestor BJ (2006) Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:48-52 (Pubitemid 44324892)
24. Murray DW (1992) Impingement and loosening of the long posterior wall acetabular implant. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:377-379
25. Cobb TK, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM (1996) The elevated-rim acetabular liner in total hip arthroplasty: relationship to postoperative dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:80-86 (Pubitemid 26028676)