Sensorimotor adaptation to inertial forces in a multi-force environment does not depend on the number of targets: Indirect validation of the altered-proprioception hypothesis

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 408, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 173-177

  Bourdin, C ^a   Bock, O ^b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b GERMAN SPORT UNIVERSITY COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Centrifugal force; Coriolis force; Generalization; Proprioception; Sensorimotor adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY ARMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; CORIOLIS FORCE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33749534833     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.072     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bock O., Schneider S., and Bloomberg J. Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation. Exp. Brain Res. 138 (2001) 359-365
2. Bourdin C., Gauthier G.M., Blouin J., and Vercher J.L. Visual feedback of the moving arm allows complete adaptation of pointing movements to centrifugal and Coriolis forces in human subjects. Neurosci. Lett. 301 (2001) 25-28
3. Coello Y., Orliaguet J.P., and Prablanc C. Pointing movement in an artificial perturbing inertial field: a prospective paradigm for motor control study. Neuropsychology 34 (1996) 879-892
4. Fisk J., Lackner J.R., and Dizio P. Gravitoinertial force level influences arm movement control. J. Neurophysiol. 69 (1993) 504-511
5. Flanagan J.R., Nakano E., Imamizu H., Osu R., Yoshioka T., and Kawato M. Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 1-5
6. Franklin D.W., Osu R., Burdet E., Kawato M., and Milner T.E. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. J. Neurophysiol. 90 (2003) 3270-3282
7. Harlow H. The formation of learning sets. Psychol. Rev. 56 (1949) 51-65
8. Johansson R.S., and Edin B.B. Predictive feedforward sensory control during grasping and manipulation in man. Biomed. Res. 14 (1993) 95-106
9. Krakauer J.W., Pine Z.M., Ghilardi M.-F., and Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J. Neurosci. 20 (2000) 8916-8924
10. Kurtzer I., DiZio P., and Lackner J.R. Adaptation to a novel multi-force environment. Exp. Brain Res. 164 (2005) 120-132
11. Lackner J.R., and Dizio P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J. Neurophysiol. 72 (1994) 299-313
12. Lackner J.R., and Dizio P. Gravitoinertial force background level affects adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements. J. Neurophysiol. 80 (1998) 546-553
13. Lackner J.R., and Dizio P. Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15 (2005) 653-659
14. Lackner J.R., Dizio P., and Fisk J.D. Tonic vibration reflexes and background force level. Acta Astronautica 26 (1992) 133-136
15. Nougier V., Bard C., Fleury M., Teasdale N., Cole J., Forget R., Paillard J., and Lamarre Y. Control of single-joint movements in deafferented patients: evidence for amplitude coding rather than position control. Exp. Brain Res. 109 (1996) 473-482
16. Nowak D.A., Hermsdorfer J., Schneider E., and Glasauer S. Moving objects in a rotating environment: rapid prediction of Coriolis and centrifugal force perturbations. Exp. Brain Res. 157 (2004) 241-254
17. Pipereit K., Bock O., and Vercher J.L. The contribution of proprioceptive feedback to sensorimotor adaptation. Exp. Brain Res. 174 (2006) 45-52
18. Shadmer R. Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models. Hum. Mov. Sci. 23 (2004) 543-568
19. Shadmer R., and Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14 (1994) 3208-3224
20. Stratton G.M. Vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychol. Rev. 4 (1897) 341-481
21. Welch R., Bridgeman B., Anand S., and Browman K. Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaption and generalization to a novel displacement. Percept. Psychophys. 54 (1993) 195-204
22. Wolpert D., Miall R.C., and Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2 (1998) 338-347