Revalidation: A critical perspective

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 61, Issue 584, 2011, Pages 166-168

  Greenhalgh, Trisha ^a   Wong, Geoff ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IMMUNIZATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POLICY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROFESSIONALISM; RELIABILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; SPORT; UNITED KINGDOM; ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; STANDARD;

ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMANS;

EID: 79955845347     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X561113     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Royal College of General Practitioners. RCGP Guide to the Revalidation of General Practitioners. London: RCGP, 2010. http://www.rcgp.org.uk/PDF/Guide-to- Revalidation%20for%20GPs-fifth-FINAL.pdf (accessed 28 Jan 2011).
2. Van Zwanenberg T. Revalidation: the purpose needs to be clear. BMJ 2004; 328(7441): 684-686. (Pubitemid 38393407)
3. Pringle M. Regulation and revalidation of doctors. BMJ 2006; 333(7560): 161-162. (Pubitemid 44406740)
4. Southgate L, Pringle M. Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice. BMJ 1999; 319(7218): 1180-1183. (Pubitemid 29502025)
5. Wakeford R. GMC's proposals for revalidation would not be accurate, economical, or fair. BMJ 2000; 321: 1220.
6. Elwyn G. Revalidation: cracks at first, now chasms. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55(516): 562. (Pubitemid 40903820)
7. Thomas P. Will GP revalidation make things better or worse? Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55(513): 318-319. (Pubitemid 40520916)
8. Wong G. Revalidation: swallow hard. BMJ 2004; 328(7447): 1077.
9. Bruce D, Phillips K, Reid R, et al. Revalidation for general practitioners: randomised comparison of two revalidation models. BMJ 2004; 328(7441): 687-691. (Pubitemid 38393411)
10. Sutherland K, Leatherman S. Does certification improve medical standards? BMJ 2006; 333: 439-441. (Pubitemid 44320131)
11. Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives and public policy. New York, NY: Harper Collins; 1995.
12. Smith J. The Shipman Inquiry. Safeguarding patients: lessons from the past, proposals for the future. London: Stationery Office, 2004. http://www.the-shipman-inquiry.org.uk/5r-page.asp?ch=26&pa=191#26.188 (accessed 28 Jan 2011).
13. Cohn S. Where have all the hospital flowers gone? BMJ 2009; 339: b5406.
14. Harrison S. New Labour, Modernisation and themedical labour process. J Soc Policy 2002; 31(3): 465-485.
15. Aristotle. Nichomean ethics. London: Penguin; 1996.
16. Kemmis S, Smith T. Personal praxis: learning through experience. In: Kemmis S, Smith T, eds. Enabling praxis: challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense; 2008: 15-36.
17. Royal College of General Practitioners. RCGP guide to the credit-based system for CPD. London: RCGP, 2010.
18. Hunter KM. 'Don't think zebras': uncertainty, interpretation, and the place of paradox in clinical education. Theoretical Medicine 1996; 17: 225-241.
19. Toon P. Towards a philosophy of general practice: A study of the virtuous practitioner. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract 1999; (78): iii-vii, 1-69.
20. Schatzki TR. Introduction: practice theory. In: Schatzki TR, Knorr Cetina K, von Savigny E, eds. The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge; 2001: 1-14.
21. Kemmis S, Grootenboer P. Situating praxis in practice: practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In: Kemmiss S, Smith T, eds. Enabling praxis: challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense; 2008: 37-64.