Regulation and revalidation of doctors

British Medical Journal

Volumn 333, Issue 7560, 2006, Pages 161-162

  Pringle, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LICENSING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECERTIFICATION; ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; PHYSICIAN; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; GREAT BRITAIN; PHYSICIANS;

EID: 33746272940     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.333.7560.161     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. The Shipman Inquiry. Safeguarding patients: lessons from the past, proposals for the future [chairman Dame Janet Smith]. London: Stationery Office, 2004.
2. Chief Medical Officer. Good doctors, safer patients. London: Department of Health, 2006.
3. General Medical Council. A licence to practise and revalidation. London: GMC, 2003.
4. Esmail A. Failure to act on good intentions. BMJ 2005;330:1144-7.
5. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. 2nd ed. London: GMC, 1998.
6. Royal College of General Practitioners and General Practitioners Committee of the BMA. Good medical practice for general practitioners. London: RCGP, 2002.
7. General Medical Council. Changing times, changing culture: a review of the GMC since 1995. London: GMC, 2000.
8. Allsop J. Regulation of the medical profession. In: Allsop J, Saks M, eds. Regulating the health professions. London: Sage, 2002.