Revalidation: Cracks at first, now chasms

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 55, Issue 516, 2005, Pages 562-

  Elwyn, Glyn ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NOTE; PATIENT CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FAMILY PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN;

EID: 21344460244     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Pringle M. Revalidation of doctors: the credibility challenge. John Fry Fellowship Lecture. London: The Nuffield Trust, 2005.
2. The Shipman Inquiry. Safeguarding patients: lessons from the past, proposals for the future. London, TSO, 2004. http://www.the-shipman-inquiry.org.uk/fifthreport.asp (accessed 13 Jun 2004).
3. General Medical Council. Developing medical regulation: a vision for the future. The GMC's response to the call for ideas by the review of clinical performance and medical regulation. London: General Medical Council, 2005.
4. Van Zwanenberg T. Revalidation: the purpose needs to be clear. BMJ 2004; 328: 684-686.
5. Lakhani M. GMC and the future of revalidation: a way forward. BMJ 2005; 330: 1326-1328.