Accuracy of a preoperative model for predicting invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ on vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1364-1371

  Houssami, Nehmat ^a   Ambrogetti, Daniela ^b   Marinovich, M Luke ^a   Bianchi, Simonetta ^c   MacAskill, Petra ^a   Vezzosi, Vania ^c   Mamounas, Eleftherios P ^d   Ciatto, Stefano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Istituto per Lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica ISPO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^d Aultman Health Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE BREAST CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TISSUE STRUCTURE; VACUUM ASSISTED CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VACUUM;

EID: 79955813730     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1438-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. S Ciatto N Houssami D Ambrogetti, et al. 2007 Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies Breast Cancer Res Treat 101 291 297 16823506 10.1007/s10549-006-9289-6 (Pubitemid 46169883)
2. SH Parker F Burbank RJ Jackman, et al. 1994 Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study Radiology 193 359 364 7972743 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Fmt12luw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24338314)
3. L Liberman 2000 Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy Radiol Clin North Am 38 791 807 10943278 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70201-3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhsFCgtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30640066)
4. F Burbank 1997 Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy Radiology 202 843 847 9051043 1:STN:280: DyaK2s3gtlCksw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27093464)
5. E Provenzano SE Pinder 2009 Pre-operative diagnosis of breast cancer in screening: problems and pitfalls Pathology 41 3 17 19089735 10.1080/ 00313020802563478
6. W Bruening J Fontanarosa K Tipton, et al. 2010 Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions Ann Intern Med 152 238 246 20008742
7. EA Rakha IO Ellis 2007 An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens J Clin Pathol 60 1300 1306 17630399 10.1136/jcp.2006.045377 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjgtlOrsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 350247244)
8. N Houssami S Ciatto I Ellis D Ambrogetti 2007 Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates Cancer 109 487 495 17186530 10.1002/cncr.22435 (Pubitemid 46190956)
9. U Kettritz K Rotter I Schreer, et al. 2004 Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study Cancer 100 245 251 14716757 10.1002/cncr.11887 (Pubitemid 38063631)
10. ME El-Sayed EA Rakha J Reed, et al. 2008 Audit of performance of needle core biopsy diagnoses of screen detected breast lesions Eur J Cancer 44 2580 2586 18632261 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.024
11. RJ Jackman F Burbank SH Parker, et al. 2001 Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates Radiology 218 497 502 11161168 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3lvVeisw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32121065)
12. MG Wallis S Cheung O Kearins GM Lawrence 2009 Non-operative diagnosis-effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme Eur Radiol 19 318 323 18751983 10.1007/s00330-008-1157-9 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M%2FnslSntA%3D%3D
13. MJ Bagnall AJ Evans AR Wilson, et al. 2001 Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification Clin Radiol 56 828 832 11895299 10.1053/crad.2001.0779 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387mt1Khug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 35023813)
14. MF Dillon EW McDermott CM Quinn, et al. 2006 Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only J Surg Oncol 93 559 563 16705731 10.1002/jso.20445 (Pubitemid 43806991)
15. TW Yen KK Hunt MI Ross, et al. 2005 Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ J Am Coll Surg 200 516 526 15804465 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.11.012 (Pubitemid 40432319)
16. EA O'Flynn JC Morel J Gonzalez, et al. 2009 Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy Clin Radiol 64 178 183 19103348 10.1016/j.crad.2008.08.007
17. FR Margolin L Kaufman RP Jacobs SR Denny JD Schrumpf 2004 Stereotactic core breast biopsy of malignant calcifications: diagnostic yield of cores with and cores without calcifications on specimen radiographs Radiology 233 251 254 15333764 10.1148/radiol.2331031680 (Pubitemid 39280981)
18. N Houssami L Irwig 1998 Likelihood ratios for clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and fine needle biopsy in women with breast problems Breast 7 85 89 10.1016/S0960-9776(98)90062-5 (Pubitemid 28230831)
19. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al, editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Europe Against Cancer, European Commission; 2006.
20. H Denley SE Pinder CW Elston AH Lee IO Ellis 2000 Needle core biopsy of the breast Curr Diagn Pathol 6 200 205 10.1054/cdip.2000.0036
21. DN Krag SJ Anderson TB Julian, et al. 2007 Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial Lancet Oncol 8 881 888 17851130 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFektbzM (Pubitemid 47488052)