Audit of performance of needle core biopsy diagnoses of screen detected breast lesions

European Journal of Cancer

Volumn 44, Issue 17, 2008, Pages 2580-2586

  El Sayed, Maysa E ^a,b   Rakha, Emad A ^a   Reed, Jacquie ^c   Lee, Andrew HS ^a   Evans, Andrew J ^c   Ellis, Ian O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b MENOUFIA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Needle core biopsy; Quality assurance; Screen detected breast lesions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNITED KINGDOM; VARIANCE;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORKLOAD;

EID: 55249087624     PISSN: 09598049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Pinder S.E., Elston C.W., and Ellis I.O. The role of pre-operative diagnosis in breast cancer. Histopathology 28 (1996) 563-566
2. Litherland J.C., Evans A.J., Wilson A.R., et al. The impact of core-biopsy on pre-operative diagnosis rate of screen detected breast cancers. Clin Radiol 51 (1996) 562-565
3. Britton P.D., Flower C.D., Freeman A.H., et al. Changing to core biopsy in an NHS breast screening unit. Clin Radiol 52 (1997) 764-767
4. Rakha E.A., and Ellis I.O. An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol 60 (2007) 1300-1306
5. de Paredes E.S., Langer T.G., and Cousins J. Interventional breast procedures. Curr Probl Diag Radiol 27 (1998) 133-184
6. Israel P.Z. The revolution in breast biopsy: where is the surgeon?. Am Surg 62 (1996) 93-95
7. NHSBSP Breast Screening Programme: Guidelines for Non-Operative Diagnostic Procedures and Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening. Sheffield: NHSBSP Pub. No 50; June 2001.
8. European Commission. European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1996.
9. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2006.
10. Wells C.A., Perera R., White F.E., and Domizio P. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the UK breast screening programme: a national audit of results. Breast 8 (1999) 261-266
11. Snead D.R., Vryenhoef P., Pinder S.E., et al. Routine audit of breast fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology specimens and aspirator inadequate rates. Cytopathology 8 (1997) 236-247
12. Ciatto S., Houssami N., Ambrogetti D., et al. Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101 (2007) 291-297
13. Crystal P., Koretz M., Shcharynsky S., Makarov V., and Strano S. Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 33 (2005) 47-52
14. Bolivar A.V., Alonso-Bartolome P., Garcia E.O., and Ayensa F.G. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 cases. Acta Radiol 46 (2005) 690-695
15. Guidelines for non-operative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. Sheffield; June 2001.
16. Third Edition of the NHS Breast Screening Programme's Guidelines for Pathology Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening and the Second Edition of The Royal College of Pathologists' Minimum Dataset for Breast Cancer Histopathology. Sheffield; January 2005.
17. Foster Jr. R.S. Core-cutting needle biopsy for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Am J Surg 143 (1982) 622-623
18. Whitlock J.P., Evans A.J., Burrell H.C., et al. Digital imaging improves upright stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications. Clin Radiol 55 (2000) 374-377
19. Jackman R.J., and Marzoni Jr. F.A. Stereotactic histologic biopsy with patients prone: technical feasibility in 98% of mammographically detected lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 (2003) 785-794
20. Parker S.H., Lovin J.D., Jobe W.E., et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 176 (1990) 741-747
21. Britton P.D., and McCann J. Needle biopsy in the NHS Breast Screening Programme 1996/97: how much and how accurate?. The Breast 8 (1999) 5-11
22. Lieske B., Ravichandran D., and Wright D. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of screen-detected breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 95 (2006) 62-66
23. Lee J.M., Kaplan J.B., Murray M.P., et al. Underestimation of DCIS at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 (2007) 468-474
24. Liberman L., Drotman M., Morris E.A., et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89 (2000) 2538-2546