What goes through the gate? Exploring interference with visual feature binding

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1597-1604

  Ueno, Taiji ^a   Mate, Judit ^b   Allen, Richard J ^c   Hitch, Graham J ^d   Baddeley, Alan D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feature binding; Filtering; Overwriting; Visual suffix; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECALL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REFERENCE VALUES; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955813696     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.030     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allen R.J., Baddeley A.D., Hitch G.J. Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:298-313.
2. Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:417-423.
3. Crowder R.G. Mechanisms of auditory backward-masking in the stimulus suffix effect. Psychological Review 1978, 85:502-524.
4. Gajewski D.A., Brockmole J.R. Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(4):581-587.
5. Griffin I.C., Nobre A.C. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:1176-1194.
6. Heinke D., Backhaus A., Sun Y., Humphreys G.W. The selective attention for identification model (SAIM): Simulating visual search in natural colour images. Attention in Cognitive Systems 2007, 4840:141-154.
7. Heinke D., Sun Y., Humphreys G.W. Modeling grouping through interactions between top-down and bottom-up processes: The grouping and selective attention for identification model (G-SAIM). Attention and Performance in Computational Vision 2005, 3368:148-158.
8. Jiang Y.V., Makovski T., Shim W.M. Visual memory for features, conjunctions, objects and locations. The Visual World in Memory 2009, 33-65. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. J.R. Brockmole (Ed.).
9. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997, 390:279-281.
10. Makovski T., Sussman R., Jiang Y.V. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34(2):369-380.
11. Matsukura M., Luck S.J., Vecera S.P. Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization?. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:1422-1434.
12. Morey C.C., Cowan N. When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:296-301.
13. Olson I., Jiang Y. Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the " strong object" hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics 2002, 64:1055-1067.
14. Treisman A. Features and objects: the Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1988, 40(A):201-237.
15. Treisman A. Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B) 1998, 353:1295-1306.
16. Treisman A. Object tokens, binding and visual memory. Handbook of binding and memory: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience 2006, 315-388. Oxford University Press, Oxford. H.D. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, U. Lindenberger (Eds.).
17. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:97-136.
18. Ueno, T., Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Saito, S. (in press). Disruption of binding in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition.
19. Vogel E.K., McCollough A.W., Machizawa M.G. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature 2005, 438:500-503.
20. Vogel E.K., Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:92-114.
21. Wheeler M.E, Treisman A.M. Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:48-64.