Relationship between surface oxide layer and transient traction characteristics for two steel rollers under unlubricated and water lubricated conditions

Wear

Volumn 271, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 25-31

  Nakahara, Tsunamitsu ^a   Baek, Koan Sok ^b   Chen, Hua ^c   Ishida, Makoto ^c  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b IHI CORPORATION   (Japan)

^c Railway Technology Institute   (Japan)

Author keywords

Rail and wheel; Surface analyses; Two rollers; Unsteady traction coefficient

Indexed keywords

ARGON ION; DRY AND WET CONDITIONS; LASER RAMAN; MECHANICAL MIXING; OXIDE LAYER; RAIL/WHEEL; SPUTTER ETCHING; STEEL ROLLER; SURFACE MATERIALS; SURFACE OXIDE LAYER; THIN OXIDE LAYERS; TRACTION CHARACTERISTICS; TRACTION COEFFICIENT; TRIBOCHEMICAL REACTION; TWIN-DISC; TWIN-ROLLERS; TWO ROLLERS; UNSTEADY TRACTION COEFFICIENT;

ARGON LASERS; AUGER ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; CARBON STEEL; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LUBRICATION; ROLLERS (MACHINE COMPONENTS); SURFACE REACTIONS; SURFACES; VEHICLE WHEELS;

TRACTION (FRICTION);

EID: 79955782924     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.10.030     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Beagley T.M., Pritchard C. Wheel/rail adhesion-the overriding influence of water. Wear 1975, 35:299-313.
2. Beagley T.M., McEwen I.J., Pritchard C. Wheel/rail adhesion-the influence of railhead debris. Wear 1975, 33:141-152.
3. Beagley T.M., McEwen I.J., Pritchard C. Wheel/rail adhesion-boundary lubrication by oily fluids. Wear 1975, 33:77-88.
4. Logston C.F., Itami G.S. Locomotive friction-creep studies. Trans. J. Eng. Ind. 1980, 102:275-281.
5. Tyfour W.R., Beynon J.H., Kapoor A. The steady state wear behaviour of pearlitic rail steel under dry rolling-sliding contact conditions. Wear 1995, 180:79-89.
6. Zhang W., Chen J., Wu X., Jin X. Wheel/rail adhesion and analysis by using full scale roller rig. Wear 2002, 253:82-88.
7. Jin X.S., Zhang W.H., Zeng J., Zhou Z.R., Liu Q.Y., Wen Z.F. Adhesion experiment on a wheel-rail system and its numerical analysis. J. Eng. Tribol. Proc. IMechE J. 2004, 218(1):293-303.
8. Polach O. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit. Wear 2005, 258:992-1000.
9. Bucher F., Dmitriev A.I., Ertz M., Knothe K., Popov V.L., Psakhie S.G., Shilko E.V. Multiscale simulation of dry friction in wheel/rail contact. Wear 2006, 261(7):874-884.
10. Gallardo-Hernandez E.A., Lewis R., Dwyer-Joyce R.S. Temperature in a twindisc wheel/rail contact simulation. Tribol. Int. 2006, 39:1653-1663.
11. Gallardo-Hernandez E.A., Lewis R. Twin disc assessment of wheel/rail adhesion. Wear 2008, 265:1309-1316.
12. Baek K., Kyogoku K., Nakahara T. An experimental study of transient traction characteristics between rail and wheel under low slip and low speed conditions. Wear 2008, 265:1417-1424.
13. Baek K., Kyogoku K., Nakahara T. An experimental study of transient traction characteristics in rolling-sliding wheel/rail contacts under dry-wet conditions. Wear 2007, 263:169-179.
14. Ishida M., Nakahara T. Derailment accident in Hibiya and tribology. J. Jpn. Soc. Trib. 2001, 46:548-555. (in Japanese).
15. Rigney D.A., Hammerberg J.E. Unlubricated sliding behavior of metals. MRS Bull. 1998, 23(6):32-36.
16. Rigney D.A. Transfer, mixing and associated chemical and mechanical processes during the sliding of ductile materials. Wear 2000, 245:1-9.
17. Chen H, Ban T., Ishida M., Nakahara T. Effect of water temperature on the adhesion between rail and wheel. P. I. Mech. E J.-J. Eng. Trib. 2006, 220:1-9.
18. Olofsson U. A multi-layer model of low adhesion between railway wheel and rail. J. Rail Rapid Transit 2007, 221:385-389.