Comparison of 3D and 2D breast density estimation from synthetic ultrasound tomography images and digital mammograms of anthropomorphic software breast phantoms

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 7961, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Bakic, Predrag R ^a   Li, Cuiping ^b   West, Erik ^b   Sak, Mark ^b   Gavenonis, Sara C ^a   Duric, Nebojsa ^b   Maidment, Andrew D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

anthropomorphic breast phantom; breast density analysis; Digital mammography; ultrasound tomography; validation

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHIC BREAST PHANTOM; BREAST DENSITY ANALYSIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND TOMOGRAPHY; VALIDATION;

CLOUDS; CORRELATION METHODS; ESTIMATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRASONICS; X RAY SCREENS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 79955756454     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.878932     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Glide Hurst CK, Duric N, Littrup P. Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images. Medical Physics. 2008;35:3988-3997.
2. Zhang C, Bakic PR, Maidment ADA. Development of an Anthropomorphic Breast Software Phantom Based on Region Growing Algorithm. Paper presented at: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2008; San Diego, CA.
3. Bakic PR, Albert M, Brzakovic D, Maidment ADA. Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. Medical Physics. 2002;29(9):2131-2139.
4. Bakic PR, Ng S, Ringer P, Carton A-K, Conant EF, Maidment ADA. Validation and Optimization of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction using an Anthropomorphic Software Breast Phantom. SPIE Medical Imaging San Diego, CA: SPIE; 2010.
5. Young S, Park S, Anderson K, Badano A, Myers KJ, Bakic PR. Estimating DBT performance in detection tasks with variable-background phantoms. Paper presented at: SPIE Medical Imaging Conference, 2009; Lake Buena Vista, FL.
6. Bakic PR, Ringer P, Kuo J, Ng. S, Maidment ADA. Analysis of Geometric Accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction. Int'l Workshop on Digital Mammography. Girona, Spain: Springer; 2010.
7. Bakic PR, Lau B, Carton A-K, Reiser I, Maidment ADA, Nishikawa RM. An Anthropomorphic Software Breast Phantom for Tomosynthesis Simulation: Power Spectrum Analysis of Phantom Projections. Int'l Workshop on Digital Mammography. Girona, Spain: Springer; 2010.
8. Lau AB, Bakic PR, Reiser I, Carton A-K, Maidment ADA, Nishikawa RM. An Anthropomorphic Software Breast Phantom for Tomosynthesis Simulation: Power Spectrum Analysis of Phantom Reconstructions. Medical Physics. 2010;37:3473.
9. Carton A-K, Bakic PR, Ullberg C, Derand H, Maidment ADA. Development of a physical 3D anthropomorphic breast phantom Medical Physics. 2011;38:891-896.
10. Bakic PR, Brzakovic D. Simulation of digital mammogram acquisition. In: Boone JM, Dobbins JT, eds. SPIE Medical Imaging. Vol 3659. San Diego, CA: SPIE, Bellingham, WA; 1999:866-877.
11. Bakic PR, Albert M, Brzakovic D, Maidment ADA. Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. II. Evaluation of synthetic mammogram texture. Medical Physics. 2002;29(9):2140-2151.
12. Ruiter NV, Zhang C, Bakic PR, Carton A-K, Kuo J, Maidment ADA. Simulation of tomosynthesis images based on an anthropomorphic software breast tissue phantom. In: Sonka M, Manduca A, eds. SPIE Medical Imaging. San Diego, CA: SPIE; 2008.
13. Xia S, Liu F, Maidment ADA, Bakic PR. Refinements to the Deformation Model of an Anthropomorphic Computer Generated Breast Phantom. Medical Physics. 2010;37:3131.
14. Yaffe MJ, Boone JM, Packard N, et al. The myth of the 50-50 breast. Medical Physics. 2009;36:5437-5443.
15. Duric N, Littrup P, Poulo L, et al. Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: First results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype. Medical Physics. 2007;34:773-785. (Pubitemid 46185157)
16. Duric N, Littrup P, Chandiwala-Mody P, et al. In-vivo imaging results with ultrasound tomography: Report on an ongoing study at the Karmanos Cancer Institute. SPIE Medical Imaging. San Diego, CA; 2010.
17. Mast TD. Empirical relationships between acoustic parameters in human soft tissues. Acoustic Research Letters Online. 2000:37-42. (Pubitemid 38957884)
18. Li C, Duric N, Littrup P, Huang L. In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 2009;35:1615-1628.
19. Bakic PR, Carton A-K, Kontos D, Zhang C, Troxel AB, Maidment ADA. Breast percent density estimation from mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections. Radiology. 2009.
20. Conant EF, Li D, Gavenonis SC, et al. A Comparative Study of the Inter-reader Variability of Breast Percent Density Estimation in Digital Mammography: Potential Effect of Reader's Training and Clinical Experience. Int'l Workshop on Digital Mammography. Girona, Spain: Springer; 2010.