Validation and optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction using an anthropomorphic software breast phantom

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 7622, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages

  Bakic, Predrag R ^a   Ng, Susan ^b   Ringer, Peter ^b   Carton, Ann Katherine ^a   Conant, Emily F ^a   Maidment, Andrew D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Real Time Tomography LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphic phantom; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Mammography; Optimization of imaging systems; Tomographic reconstruction; X ray image simulation

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL PROPERTIES; ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS; AREA UNDER THE ROC CURVE; BINARY DECISION; BREAST TISSUES; CLINICAL IMAGES; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS (DBT); GROUND TRUTH; INPUT PARAMETER; INTENSITY THRESHOLD; INTERNAL COMPOSITION; PHANTOM IMAGES; RECONSTRUCTED IMAGE; RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS; RECONSTRUCTION FILTERS; ROC ANALYSIS; ROC CURVES; SOFTWARE BREAST PHANTOMS; SOFTWARE PHANTOM; TASK-BASED; TOMOGRAPHIC RECONSTRUCTION; VOXEL PHANTOMS; X-RAY ATTENUATION; X-RAY ATTENUATION COEFFICIENT; X-RAY IMAGE;

ALGORITHMS; HISTOLOGY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; PIXELS; TISSUE;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 79958838884     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.845299     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. Nov 1997;205(2):399-406.
2. Poplack S, Kogel C, Nagy H. Initial experience with digital breast tomosynthesis in 99 breasts of 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. Paper presented at: RSNA 2005; Chicago, IL.
3. Kopans D. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Experience with Imaging over 3500 Subjects Paper presented at: RSNA, 2009; Chicago, IL.
4. Martin LJ, Boyd NF. Mammographie density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Research. 2008;10:201-214.
5. Bakic PR, Kontos D, Carton A-K, Maidment ADA. Breast Percent Density Estimation from 3D Reconstructed Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images. Paper presented at: Medical imaging: Physics of medical imaging; 2008, 2008; San Diego, CA.
6. Bakic PR, Kontos D, Troxel AB, Maidment ADA. Comparison of Breast Percent Density Estimated from Digital Mammograms and Central Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Slice Images. Paper presented at: 9th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2008; Tucson, AZ.
7. Bakic PR, Carton A-K, Kontos D, Zhang C, Troxel AB, Maidment ADA. Breast percent density estimation from mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections. Radiology. 2009.
8. Aiello EJ, Tworogcr SS, Yasui Y, et al. Associations among circulating sex hormones, insulin-like growth factor, lipids, and mammographic density in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(6):1411-1417.
9. Bakic PR, Brzakovic D. Simulation of digital mammogram acquisition. In: Boone JM, Dobbins JT, eds. SPIE Medical Imaging. Vol 3659. San Diego, CA: SPIE, Beltingham, WA; 1999:866-877.
10. Bakic PR, Albert M, Brzakovic D, Maidment ADA. Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. Medical Physics. 2002;29(9):2131-2139.
11. Bakic PR, Albert M, Brzakovic D, Maidment ADA. Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. II. Evaluation of synthetic mammogram texture. Medical Physics. 2002;29(9):2140-2151.
12. Zhang C, Bakic PR, Maidment ADA. Development of an Anthropomorphic Breast Software Phantom Based on Region Growing Algorithm. Paper presented at: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2008; San Diego, CA.
13. Ruiter NV, Zhang C, Bakic PR, Carton A-K, Kuo J, Maidment ADA. Simulation of tomosynthesis images based on an anthropomorphic software breast tissue phantom. In: Sonka M, Manduca A, eds. SPIE Medical Imaging. San Diego, CA: SPIE; 2008.
14. Johns PC, Yaffe MJ. X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 1987;32(6):675-695.
15. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 1994;39( 10): 1629-1638.
16. Pawluczyk O, Augustine BJ, Yaffe MJ, et al. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Medical Physics. 2003;30(3):352-364.
17. Highnam R, Pan X, Warren R, Jeffreys M, Davey Smith G, Brady M. Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF). Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2006;51(11 ):2695-2713.
18. Highnam R, Jeffreys M, McCormack V, Warren R, Davey-Smith G, Brady M. Comparing measurements of breast density. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2007;52( 19):5881-5895.
19. Carton A-K, Derand H, Ullberg C, Bakic PR, Maidment ADA. Development of a 3D physical anthropomorphic breast phantom. Paper presented at: Tomosynthesis Imaging Symposium 2009: Frontiers in Research and Clinical Applications, 2009; Durham, NC.
20. Johnson J, Lubin J, Nafziger J, Krupinski E, Roehrig H. Channelized model observer using a visual discrimination model. Paper presented at: Medical Imaging 2005, 2005; San Diego, CA.
21. Gallas BD, Barrett HH. Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer. Journal of the Optimal/ Society of America A. 2003;20:1725-1738.
22. Laarhoven PJM, Aarts EHL. Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer; 1987.