In-vivo imaging results with ultrasound tomography: Report on an ongoing study at the Karmanos Cancer Institute

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 7629, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Duric, Nebojsa ^a   Littrup, Peter ^a   Chandiwala Mody, Priti ^a   Li, Cuiping ^a   Schmidt, Steven ^a   Myc, Lukasz ^a   Rama, Olsi ^a   Bey Knight, Lisa ^a   Lupinacci, Jessica ^a   Ranger, Bryan ^a   Szczepanski, Amy ^a   West, Erik ^a  

^a KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast imaging; breast masses; image fusion; ultrasound tomography

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC MASS; ACOUSTIC PARAMETERS; ACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY; BI-RADS; BREAST IMAGING; BREAST MASS; FUSION IMAGING; IN-VIVO IMAGING; PREDICTIVE MODELS; SOUND SPEED; THRESHOLDING; ULTRASOUND TOMOGRAPHY;

IMAGE FUSION; IMAGING SYSTEMS; TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONICS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 77956803021     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.845646     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Berry DA, et al., Effect of Screening and Adjuvant Therapy on Mortality from Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005; 1784-1792 (Pubitemid 41549890)
2. Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000; 355:129-134.
3. van den Biggelaar FJ, Nelemans PJ, Flobbe K. Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. Breast. 2008; 17:85-90. (Pubitemid 351228791)
4. Schell MJ, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Qaqish BF, Barlow WE, Rosenberg RD, Smith-Bindman R. Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. Radiology. 2007; 243:681-9. (Pubitemid 46799420)
5. Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S, Berlin JA, Reynolds EE. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146:516-26 (Pubitemid 351650561)
6. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, Kuhn W, Schild HH. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007; 370:485-92.
7. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, Smith RA, Warner E, Yaffe M, Andrews KS, Russell CA; American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57:75-89.
8. Kolb, T.M., Lichy, J. and Newhouse, J.H. Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluation. Radiology, 2002; 225: 165-175.
9. ACRIN website: www.acrin.org.
10. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Hovanessian Larsen L, Barr RG, Farria DM, Marques HS, Boparai K, for the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151-2163.
11. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 196:123-34, 1995.
12. Norton SJ, Linzer M. Ultrasonic reflectivity tomography: reconstruction with circular transducer arrays. Ultrason Imaging 1979. Apr;1(2):154-84.
13. http://www.u-sys.com/
14. Greenleaf JF, Johnson SA, Bahn RC, Rajagopalan B: Quantitative cross-sectional imaging of ultrasound parameters. 1977 Ultrasonics Symposium Proc., 1977, IEEE Cat. # 77CH1264-1SU, pp. 989- 995.
15. Carson PL, Meyer CR, Scherzinger AL, Oughton TV. Breast imaging in coronal planes with simultaneous pulse echo and transmission ultrasound. Science 1981, Dec 4;214(4525):1141-3.
16. Andre MP, Janee HS, Martin PJ, Otto GP, Spivey BA, Palmer DA, "High-speed data acquisition in a diffraction tomography system employing large-scale toroidal arrays," International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 1997;Vol. 8, Issue 1:137-147.
17. Johnson SA, Borup DT, Wiskin JW, Natterer F, Wuebbling F, Zhang Y, Olsen C. Apparatus and Method for Imaging with Wavefields using Inverse Scattering Techniques. United States Patent 6,005,916 (1999).
18. Marmarelis VZ, Kim T, Shehada RE. Proceedings of the SPIE: Medical Imaging; Ultrasonic Imaging and Signal Processing 2003, Paper 5035-6.
19. Liu D-L, Waag RC. "Propagation and backpropagation for ultrasonic wavefront design," IEEE Trans. on Ultras. Ferro. and Freq. Contr. 1997;44(1):1-13.
20. Duric N, Littrup PJ, Babkin A, Chambers D, Azevedo S, Kalinin A, Pevzner R, Tokarev M, Holsapple E, Rama O, Duncan R. Development of Ultrasound Tomography for Breast Imaging: Technical Assessment. Medical Physics. May 2005, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 1375-1386.
21. Duric N, Littrup P, Poulo L, Babkin A, Pevzner R, Holsapple E, Rama O, Glide C. Detection of Breast Cancer With Ultrasound Tomography: First Results with the Computerized Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (C.U.R.E) Prototype. Medical Physics Feb 2007; Vol 34 (2), pp. 773-785.
22. Glide CK, Duric N. Littrup P. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density. Med Phys. 2007 Nov; Vol. 34, Issue 11:4491-4498.
23. Glide-Hurst C, Duric N, Littrup P. Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images. Med Phys. 2008;Vol. 35, Issue 9, pp. 3988-3997.
24. Duric N, Li C, Littrup PJ, Huang L, Glide-Hurst C, Rama O, Bey-Knight L, Schmidt S, Xu Y, Lupinacci J. Detection and characterization of breast masses with ultrasound tomography: clinical results. Proc. SPIE 2008; 6920, 6920-28.
25. Lupinacci J, Duric N, Li C, Littrup P, Wang D, Rama O, Schmidt S. Monitoring of breast masses with ultrasound tomography for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Proc. SPIE 2009;7265, 7265-43.
26. Li C, Duric N, Huang L. Clinical breast imaging using sound-speed reconstructions of ultrasound tomography data. Proc. SPIE 2008;6920, 6920-09.
27. Boyd, N.F., et al., Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a crosssectional study. Lancet Onc. 2009. 10(6): pp.569-580.