Landmarks' use in speech map navigation tasks

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 192-199

  Roger, Morgane ^a   Bonnardel, Nathalie ^a   Le Bigot, Ludovic ^b  

^a University of Provence Aix Marseille University   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Frames of reference; Guidance applications; Navigation; Route description

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955717300     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alm H., Nilsson L., Jármark S., Savelid J., Hennings U. The effects of landmark presentation on driver performance and uncertainty in a navigation task - A field study 1992, Swedish Prometheus, Technical Report (No. S/IT-4), VTI, Linköping, Sweden.
2. Bengler, K., Haller, R., &, Zimmer, A. (1994). Experimental optimisation of route guidance information using context information. In Proceedings of the first World Congress on Applications of Transport and Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems (pp. 1758-1765). Boston: Artech House.
3. Burnett G. Turn right at the traffic lights: The requirements for landmarks in vehicle navigation systems. The Journal of Navigation 2000, 53:499-510.
4. Burns, P. C., (1997). Navigation and the older driver. Unpublished PhD thesis, UK: Loughborough University.
5. Chafe W.L. Integration and involvement. Spoken and written language 1982, Vol. IX:35-53. ABLEX Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ. D. Tannen (Ed.).
6. Denis M. The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Current Psychology of Cognition 1997, 16:409-458.
7. Denis M., Pazzaglia F., Cornoldi C., Bertolo L. Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1999, 13:145-174.
8. Denis M., Zimmer H.D. Analog properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions. Psychological Research 1992, 54:286-298.
9. Fraser N.M., Gilbert G.N. Simulating speech systems. Computer Speech and Language 1991, 5:81-99.
10. Fussell S.R., Krauss R.M. Sensitivity and bias in estimates of others' knowledge. European Journal of Social Psychology 1991, 21:445-454.
11. Gale S. Human aspects of interactive multimedia communication. Interacting with Computers 1990, 2:175-189.
12. Golledge R.G. Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes 1999, 5-45. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. R.G. Golledge (Ed.).
13. Grall, M., & Visser, W. (2001). Description d'itinéraires: effets du modèle de l'interlocuteur. Détailler les moyens ou restreindre au but à atteindre. (Route description: Interlocutor modelling effects. Detail means or focus on the goal to be reached?). In E. Raufaste, & A. Tricot (Eds.), Proceedings of the first workshop on ergonomic psychology: Epique'01 (pp. 145-151). Nantes, France.
14. Isaacs E.A., Clark H.H. References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1987, 116:26-37.
15. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), Part 11: Guidance on usability 1997, ISO 9241-11, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
16. Krauss R.M., Fussell S.R. Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. Intellectual teamwork: Social and technical bases of collaborative work 1990, 111-145. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, C. Egido (Eds.).
17. Le Bigot L., Jamet E., Rouet J.-F., Amiel V. Mode and modal transfer effects on performance and discourse organization with an information retrieval dialogue system in natural language. Computers in Human Behavior 2006, 22:467-500.
18. Le Bigot L., Rouet J.-F., Jamet E. Effects of speech and text-based interaction modes in natural language human-computer dialogue. Human Factors 2007, 49:1045-1053.
19. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
20. Levinson S. Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. Language and space 1996, 385-436. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, M. Garrett (Eds.).
21. May A., Ross T., Osman Z. The design of next generation in-vehicle navigation systems for the older driver. Interacting with Computers 2005, 17:643-659.
22. Miller G.A., Johnson-Laird P.N. Language and perception 1976, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma.
23. Millonig A., Schechtner K. Developing landmark-based pedestrian navigation systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2007, 8(1):43-49.
24. Münzer S., Zimmer H., Schwalm M., Baus J., Alsan I. Computer assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2006, 26:200-208.
25. Nickerson R.S. How we know - and sometimes misjudge - what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:737-759.
26. Nückles M., Winter A., Wittwer J., Herbert M., Hübner M. How do experts adapt their explanations to a layperson's knowledge in asynchronous communication? An experimental study. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction 2006, 16:87-127.
27. Passini R. Wayfinding in architecture 1992, Van Nostrand Reinhold Press, New York.
28. Perrig W., Kintsch W. Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language 1985, 24:503-518.
29. Roger M., Bonnardel N., Le Bigot L. Improving navigational messages for mobile urban guides: Effects of the interlocutor model, the spatial abilities of guide, and use of landmarks on route description. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2009, 39:509-515.
30. Satalich, G. (1995). Navigation and wayfinding in virtual reality: Finding proper tools and cues to enhance navigation awareness. Unpublished Master of Science thesis. University of Washington.
31. Schober M.F. Speakers, addressees and frames of reference: Whose effort is minimized in conversations about locations?. Discourse Processes 1995, 20:219-247.
32. Shelton A., McNamara T. Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 43:274-310.
33. Taylor H.A., Tversky B. Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 1992, 31:261-282.
34. Taylor H.A., Tversky B. Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35:371-391.
35. Thorndyke P.W., Hayes-Roth B. Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:560-589.
36. Tom A., Denis M. Referring to landmarks or street information in route directions: What difference does it make?. Spatial information theory: Foundations of geographic information science 2003, 384-397. Springer, Berlin. W. Kuhn, M. Worboys, S. Timpf (Eds.).
37. Tversky B. Spatial perspective in descriptions. Language and space 1996, 463-491. MIT Press, Cambridge. P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, M. Garrett (Eds.).
38. Tversky B., Lee P.U. How space structures language. Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge 1998, 157-175. Springer, Berlin. C. Freksa, C. Habel, K.F. Wender (Eds.).
39. Tversky B., Lee P.U. Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science 1999, 51-64. Springer, Berlin. C. Freksa, D.M. Mark (Eds.).
40. Tversky B., Lee P.U., Mainwaring S. Why speakers mix perspectives. Journal of Spatial Cognition and Computation 1999, 1:399-412.
41. Waller D., Hunt E., Knapp D. The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1998, 7:129-143.
42. Wickens C.D., Carswell C.M. Information processing, decision making, and cognition. Handbook of human factors 1987, 72-107. Wiley and Sons, New York. G. Saveldy (Ed.).