Molecular dynamics scheme for precise estimation of electrostatic interaction via zero-dipole summation principle

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 134, Issue 16, 2011, Pages

  Fukuda, Ikuo ^a   Yonezawa, Yasushige ^b   Nakamura, Haruki ^b  

^a INST OF PHYS AND CHEMICAL RESEARCH   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AXIOMATIC APPROACH; CLASSICAL PARTICLE; CURRENT ENERGY; CUTOFF DISTANCE; DAMPING FACTORS; DIPOLE STATE; ELECTROSTATIC ENERGIES; ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS; HEURISTIC APPROACH; MD SIMULATION; NUMERICAL INTEGRATIONS; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE COMPUTATION; POTENTIAL METHODS;

ELECTROSTATICS; HEURISTIC METHODS; LIQUID METALS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

ALGORITHMS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; SODIUM CHLORIDE; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

EID: 79955687351     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3582791     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulations of Liquids (Oxford University Press, New York, 1987).
2. D. J. Tobias, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 253 (2001). 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00198-6 (Pubitemid 32289430)
3. P. Koehl, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16, 142 (2006). 10.1016/j.sbi.2006. 03.001
4. M. M. Reif, V. Krautler, M. A. Kastenholz, X. Daura, and P. H. Hnenberger, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 3112 (2009). 10.1021/jp807421a
5. C. L. Brooks III, B. M. Pettitt, and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5897 (1985). 10.1063/1.449621
6. J. J. Nicolas, K. E. Gubbins, W. B. Streett, and D. J. Tildesley, Mol. Phys. 37, 1429 (1979). 10.1080/00268977900101051
7. P. P. Ewald, Ann. Phys. 64, 253 (1921). 10.1002/andp.19213690304
8. S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 373, 27 (1980). 10.1098/rspa.1980.0135
9. L. Onsager, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486 (1936). 10.1021/ja01299a050
10. J. A. Barker and R. O. Watts, Mol. Phys. 26, 789 (1973). 10.1080/00268977300102101
11. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin, J. Comput. Phys. 73, 325 (1987). 10.1016/0021-9991(87)90140-9
12. A. Baumketner and J.-E. Shea, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 21322 (2005). 10.1021/jp051325a (Pubitemid 41698305)
13. Y. Yonetani, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 204501 (2006). 10.1063/1.2198208 (Pubitemid 43838623)
14. H.-Q. Ding, N. Karasawa, and W. A. Goddard III, Chem. Phys. Lett. 193, 197 (1992). 10.1016/0009-2614(92)85708-I
15. K. F. Lau, H. E. Alper, T. S. Thacher, and T. R. Stouch, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 8785 (1994). 10.1021/j100086a032
16. W. Weber, P. H. Hnenberger, and J. A. McCammon, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 3668 (2000). 10.1021/jp9937757
17. M. Kastenholz and P. H. Hnenberger, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 774 (2004). 10.1021/jp0350924
18. Y.-G. Chen and J. D. Weeks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 7560 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0600282103
19. R. J. Petrella and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem. 26, 755 (2005). 10.1002/jcc.20197 (Pubitemid 40751571)
20. D. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3315 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3315
21. D. Wolf, P. Keblinski, S. R. Phillpot, and J. Eggebrecht, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8254 (1999). 10.1063/1.478738
22. D. Zahn, B. Schilling, and S. M. Kast, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 10725 (2002). 10.1021/jp025949h (Pubitemid 35410269)
23. C. J. Fennell and J. D. Gezelter, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 234104 (2006). 10.1063/1.2206581 (Pubitemid 43938884)
24. P. Demontis, S. Spanu, and G. B. Suffritti, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 7980 (2001). 10.1063/1.1364638 (Pubitemid 32486714)
25. C. Avendao and A. Gil-Villegas, Mol. Phys. 104, 1475 (2006). 10.1080/00268970600551155
26. M. Sepliarsky, M. G. Stachiotti, and R. L. Migoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 137603 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.137603
27. M. C.C. Ribeiro, Phys. Rev. B 75, 144202 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75. 144202
28. T. G. Desai, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 154707 (2007). 10.1063/1.2796161 (Pubitemid 351260796)
29. M. Goto, H. Takezoe, and K. Ishikawa, Phys. Rev. E 76, 040701(R) (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.040701 (Pubitemid 47518419)
30. T. S. Mahadevan and S. H. Garofalini, J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 8919 (2007). 10.1021/jp072530o (Pubitemid 47317471)
31. Y. Nagata and S. Mukamel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6434 (2010). 10.1021/ja100508n
32. D.-L. Chen, A. C. Stern, B. Space, and J. K. Johnson, J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 10225 (2010). 10.1021/jp103944q
33. I. Fukuda, Y. Yonezawa, and H. Nakamura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 114301 (2008). 10.1143/JPSJ.77.114301
34. P. J. Steinbach and B. R. Brooks, J. Comput. Chem. 15, 667 (1994). 10.1002/jcc.540150702
35. E. Yakub and C. Ronchi, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 11556 (2003). 10.1063/1.1624364
36. E. Yakub and C. Ronchi, J. Low Temp. Phys. 139, 633 (2005). 10.1007/s10909-005-5451-5 (Pubitemid 40940763)
37. E. Yakub, J. Phys. A 39, 4643 (2006). 10.1088/0305-4470/39/17/S51 (Pubitemid 43543390)
38. P. K. Jha, R. Sknepnek, G. I. Guerrero-Garcia, and M. O. de la Cruz, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6, 3058 (2010). 10.1021/ct100365c
39. E. Yakub, C. Ronchi, and D. Staicu, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 094508 (2007). 10.1063/1.2764484 (Pubitemid 47379119)
40. T. Arima, K. Idemitsu, Y. Inagaki, Y. Tsujita, M. Kinoshita, and E. Yakub, J. Nucl. Mater. 389, 149 (2009). 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.020
41. F. Ercolessi and J. B. Adams, Europhys. Lett. 26, 583 (1994). 10.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005
42. Q. Shi, P. Liu, and G. A. Voth, J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 16230 (2008). 10.1021/jp807205q
43. X. Wu and B. R. Brooks, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 044107 (2005). 10.1063/1.1836733 (Pubitemid 41047582)
44. X. Wu and B. R. Brooks, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 154115 (2008). 10.1063/1.2992601
45. A. Carré, L. Berthier, J. Horbach, S. Ispas, and W. Kob, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 114512 (2007). 10.1063/1.2777136 (Pubitemid 47462025)
46. G. Kikugawa, R. Apostolov, N. Kamiya, M. Taiji, R. Himeno, H. Nakamura, and Y. Yonezawa, J. Comput. Chem. 30, 110 (2009). 10.1002/jcc.21035
47. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3582791 E-JCPSA6-134-005117 for further analysis of the heuristic derivation.
48. i is not necessarily fixed uniquely, the choice does not affect the results. Note that to simply conduct an extensive application, it would be better to weaken the conditions by replacing the equalities with near equalities in conditions.
49. M. P. Tosi and F. G. Fumi, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 25, 45 (1964). 10.1016/0022-3697(64)90160-X
50. Y. Fukunishi, Y. Mikami, and H. Nakamura, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 13201 (2003). 10.1021/jp035478e
51. U. Essmann, L. Perera, M. L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, and L. G. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577 (1995). 10.1063/1.470117
52. M. Neumann, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1567 (1986). 10.1063/1.451198
53. A. Baumketner, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 104106 (2009). 10.1063/1.3081138
54. S. Queyroy, H. Nakamura, and I. Fukuda, J. Comput. Chem. 30, 1799 (2009). 10.1002/jcc.21181