Is the Ewald summation still necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 124, Issue 23, 2006, Pages

  Fennell, Christopher J ^a   Gezelter, J Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTION; EWALD SUMMATION; LATTICE SUMMATION TECHNIQUES;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

ELECTROSTATICS;

EID: 33745299454     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2206581     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. B. Roux and T. Simonson, Biophys. Chem. 78, 1 (1999).
2. C. Sagui and T. A. Darden, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 28, 155 (1999).
3. D. J. Tobias, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 253 (2001).
4. M. Born, Z. Phys. 1, 45 (1920).
5. A. Grossfield, J. Sachs, and T. B. Woolf, Proteins 41, 211 (2000).
6. P. P. Ewald, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 64, 253 (1921).
7. P. J. Steinbach and B. R. Brooks, J. Comput. Chem. 15, 667 (1994).
8. L. Onsager, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486 (1936).
9. V. Rokhlin, J. Comput. Phys. 60, 187 (1985).
10. D. Wolf, P. Keblinski, S. R. Phillpot, and J. Eggebrecht, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8255 (1999).
11. U. Essmann and M. L. Berkowitz, Biophys. J. 76, 2081 (1999).
12. S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 373, 27 (1980).
13. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulations of Liquids (Oxford University Press, New York, 1987).
14. S. G. Brush, H. L. Sahlin, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 2102 (1966).
15. L. V. Woodcock and K. Singer, Trans. Faraday Soc. 67, 12 (1971).
16. E. R. Smith, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 375, 475 (1981).
17. N. Karasawa and W. A. Goddard III, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 7320 (1989).
18. J. Kolafa and J. W. Perram, Mol. Simul. 9, 351 (1992).
19. J. W. Perram, H. G. Petersen, and S. W. de Leeuw, Mol. Phys. 65, 875 (1988).
20. R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood, Computer Simulation Using Particles (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981).
21. J. Shimada, H. Kaneko, and T. Takada, J. Comput. Chem. 14, 867 (1993).
22. B. A. Luty, M. E. Davis, I. G. Tironi, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Mol. Simul. 14, 11 (1994).
23. B. A. Luty, I. G. Tironi, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 3014 (1995).
24. T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089 (1993).
25. U. Essmann, L. Perera, M. L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, and L. G. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577 (1995).
26. D. E. Parry, Surf. Sci. 49, 433 (1975).
27. D. E. Parry, Surf. Sci. 54, 195 (1976).
28. D. M. Heyes, M. Barber, and J. H. R. Clarke, J. Exp. Zool. 73, 1485 (1977).
29. S. W. de Leeuw and J. W. Perram, Mol. Phys. 37, 1313 (1979).
30. Y.-J. Rhee, J. W. Halley, J. Hautman, and A. Rahman, Phys. Rev. B 40, 36 (1989).
31. E. Spohr, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 6342 (1997).
32. I.-C. Yeh and M. L. Berkowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 3155 (1999).
33. M. Kawata and M. Mikami, Chem. Phys. Lett. 340, 157 (2001).
34. A. Arnold, J. de Joannis, and C. Holm, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 2496 (2002).
35. J. de Joannis, A. Arnold, and C. Holm, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 2503 (2002).
36. A. Bródka, Chem. Phys. Lett. 400, 62 (2004).
37. J. E. Roberts and J. Schnitker, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5024 (1994).
38. J. E. Roberts and J. Schnitker, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 1322 (1995).
39. B. A. Luty and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 2581 (1996).
40. P. H. Hünenberger and J. A. McCammon, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 1856 (1999).
41. P. H. Hünenberger and J. A. McCammon, Biophys. Chem. 78, 69 (1999).
42. W. Weber, P. H. Hünenberger, and J. A. McCammon, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 3668 (2000).
43. D. Zahn, B. Schilling, and S. M. Kast, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 10725 (2002).
44. R. E. Jones and D. H. Templeton, J. Chem. Phys. 25, 1062 (1956).
45. D. M. Heyes, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 1924 (1981).
46. A. Rahman and F. H. Stillinger, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 3336 (1971).
47. D. J. Adams, E. M. Adams, and G. J. Hills, Mol. Phys. 38, 387 (1979).
48. T. A. Andrea, W. C. Swope, and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 4576 (1983).
49. J. A. Barker and R. O. Watts, Mol. Phys. 26, 789 (1973).
50. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
51. See EPAPS Document No. E-JCPSA6-124-515622 for a comparative analyses of the pairwise cutoff method performance for each of the seven model systems studied. This document can be reached via a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html).
52. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. R. Grigera, and T. P. Straatsma, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269 (1987).
53. M. A. Meineke, C. F. Vardeman II, T. Lin, C. J. Fennell, and J. D. Gezelter, J. Comput. Chem. 26, 252 (2005).
54. J. W. Ponder and F. M. Richards, J. Comput. Chem. 8, 1016 (1987).
55. A. R. Leach, Molecular Modeling: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. (Pearson Educated Limited, Harlow, England, 2001).
56. S. M. Kast, K. F. Schmidt, and B. Schilling, Chem. Phys. Lett. 367, 398 (2003).