A developmental sensitive period for spike timing-dependent plasticity in the retinotectal projection

Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JUN, 2010, Pages

  Tsui, Jennifer ^a   Schwartz, Neil ^a   Ruthazer, Edward S ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Albino; Development; N methyl d aspartate receptor; Retinotectal; Synaptic plasticity; Visual system; Xenopus laevis

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; IN VIVO STUDY; LONG TERM DEPRESSION; LONG TERM POTENTIATION; MEMBRANE DEPOLARIZATION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; POSTSYNAPTIC MEMBRANE; RELIABILITY; RETINA; RETINOTECTAL PROJECTION; SPIKE TIMING DEPENDENT PLASTICITY; TADPOLE; VISUAL STIMULATION; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 79955653348     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16633563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00013     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abbott, L. F., and Nelson, S. B. (2000). Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1178-1183.
2. Akerman C. J., and Cline H. T. (2006). Depolarizing GABAergic conductances regulate the balance of excitation to inhibition in the developing retinotectal circuit in vivo. J. Neurosci. 26, 5117-5130.
3. Bell, C. C., Han, V. Z., Sugawara, Y., and Grant, K. (1997). Synaptic plasticity in a cerebellum-like structure depends on temporal order. Nature 387, 278-281.
4. Bender, V. A., Bender, K. J., Brasier, D. J., and Feldman, D. E. (2006). Two coincidence detectors for spike timing-dependent plasticity in somatosensory cortex. J. Neurosci. 6, 4166-4177.
5. Celikel, T. Stostak, V. A., and Feldman, D. E. (2004). Modulation of spike timing by sensory deprivation during induction of cortical map plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 534-541.
6. Cline, H. T., and Constantine-Paton, M. (1989). NMDA receptor antagonists disrupt the retinotectal topographic map. Neuron 3, 413-426.
7. Corlew, R., Wang, Y. Ghermazien, H., Erisir, A., and Philpot, B. D. (2007). Developmental switch in the contribution of presynaptic and postsynaptic NMDA receptors to long-term depression. J. Neurosci. 27, 9835-9845.
8. Deeg, K. E., Sears, I. B., and Aizenman, C. D. (2009). Development of multisensory convergence in the Xenopus optic tectum. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 3392-3404.
9. Dong W., Lee, R. H., Xu, H., Yang, S., Pratt, K. G., Cao, V., Song, Y. K., Nurmikko, A., and Aizenman CD. (2009). Visual avoidance in Xenopus tadpoles is correlated with the maturation of visual responses in the optic tectum. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 803-815.
10. Diykov, D. Turchinovich, A. Zoidl, G., and Hofmann, K. P. (2008). Elevated intracellular chloride level in albino visual cortex neurons is mediated by Na-K-Cl co-transporter. BMC Neurosci. 9, 57.
11. Dunfield, D., and Haas, K. (2009). Metaplasticity governs natural experience-driven plasticity of nascent embryonic brain circuits. Neuron 64, 240-250.
12. Feldman, D. E. (2000). Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex. Neuron 27, 45-56.
13. Fraser, S. E. (1983). Fiber optic mapping of the Xenopus visual system: shift in the retinotectal projection during development. Dev. Biol. 95, 505-511.
14. Froemke, R. C., and Dan, Y. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature 416, 433-438.
15. Gaze, R. M., Keating, M. J., and Chung, S. H. (1974). The evolution of the retinotectal map during development in Xenopus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 185, 301-330.
16. Haas, K. Li, J., and Cline, H. T. (2006). AMPA receptors regulate experience-dependent dendritic arbor growth in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12127-12131.
17. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.
18. Hensch, T. K. (2005). Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 877-888.
19. Herrera, E., and Garcia-Frigola, C. (2008). Genetics and the development of the optic chiasm. Front. Biosci. 13, 1646-1653.
20. Hiramoto, M., and Cline, H. T. (2009). Convergence of multisensory inputs in Xenopus tadpole tectum. Dev. Neurobiol. 69, 959-971.
21. Holtmaat, A., and Svoboda, K. (2009). Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 647-658.
22. Huberman, A. D., Feller, M. B., and Chapman, B. (2008). Mechanisms underlying development of visual maps and receptive fields. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 479-509.
23. Inan, M., and Crair, M. C. (2007). Development of cortical maps: perspectives from the barrel cortex. Neuroscientist 13, 49-61.
24. Katz, L. C., and Shatz, C. J. (1996). Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 274, 1133-1138.
25. Kirkwood, A., Lee H. K., and Bear, M. F. (1995). Co-regulation of long-term potentiation and experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in visual cortex by age and experience. Nature 375, 328-331.
26. Knudsen, E. I. (2002). Instructed learning in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl. Nature 417, 322-328.
27. Levy, W. B., and Steward, O. (1983). Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 8, 791-797.
28. Li, L., Bender, K. J., Drew, P. J., Jadhav, S. P., Sylwestrak, E., and Feldman, D. E. (2009). Endocannabinoid signaling is required for development and critical period plasticity of the whisker map in somatosensory cortex. Neuron 64, 537-549.
29. MacMillan, G. J. (1979). An analysis of pigment cell development in the periodic albino mutant of Xenopus. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 52, 165-170.
30. Magee, J. C., and Johnston, D. (1997). A synaptically controlled, associative signal for Hebbian plasticity in hippocampal neurons. Science 275, 209-213.
31. Markram, H. Lübke, J., Frotscher, M., and Sakman, B. (1997). Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275, 213-215.
32. Mu, Y., and Poo, M. M. (2006). Spike timing-dependent LTP/LTD mediates visual experience-dependent plasticity in a developing retinotectal system. Neuron 50, 115-125.
33. Nevian T., and Sakmann, B. (2004). Single spine Ca2+ signals evoked by coincident EPSPs and backpropagating action potentials in spiny stellate cells of layer 4 in the juvenile rat somatosensory barrel cortex. J. Neurosci. 24, 1689-1699.
34. Nieuwkoop, P. D., and Faber, J. (1956). Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin): A Systematical and Chronological Survey of the Development from the Fertilized Egg till the End of Metamorphosis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.
35. O'Rourke, N. A., and Fraser, S. E. (1990). Dynamic changes in optic fiber terminal arbors lead to retinotopic map formation: an in vivo confocal microscopic study. Neuron 5, 159-171.
36. Pratt, K. G., Dong, W., and Aizenman, C. D. (2008). Development and spike timing-dependent plasticity of recurrent excitation in the Xenopus optic tectum. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 467-475.
37. Ruthazer, E. S., Akerman, C. J., and Cline, H. T. (2003). Control of axon branch dynamics by correlated activity in vivo. Science 301, 66-70.
38. Ruthazer, E. S., and Cline, H. T. (2004). Insights into activity-dependent map formation from the retinotectal system: a middle-of-the-brain perspective. J. Neurobiol. 59, 134-146.
39. Sakaguchi, D. S., and Murphey, R. K. (1985). Map formation in the developing Xenopus retinotectal system: an examination of ganglion cell terminal arborizations. J. Neurosci. 5, 3228-3245.
40. Schmidt, J. T. (1990). Long-term potentiation and activity-dependent retinotopic sharpening in the regenerating retinotectal projection of goldfish: common sensitive period and sensitivity to NMDA blockers. J. Neurosci. 10, 233-246.
41. Schwartz, N., Schohl, A., and Ruthazer, E. S. (2009). Neural activity regulates synaptic properties and dendritic structure in vivo through calcineurin/NFAT signaling. Neuron 62, 655-669.
42. Sjostrom, P. J., Turrigiano, G. G., and Nelson, S. B. (2001). Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron 32, 1149-1164.
43. Tao, H. W., and Poo, M.-M. (2005). Activity-dependent matching of excitatory and inhibitory inputs during refinement of visual receptive fields. Neuron 45, 829-836.
44. Tao, H. Z., Zhang, L. I., Engert, F., and Poo, M. (2001). Emergence of input specificity of ltp during development of retinotectal connections in vivo. Neuron 31, 569-580.
45. Vislay-Meltzer, R. L., Kampff, A. R., and Engert, F. (2005). Spatiotemporal specificity of neuronal activity directs the modification of receptive fields in the developing retinotectal system. Neuron 50, 101-114.
46. Wiesel, T. (1982). Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment. Nature 299, 583-591.
47. Wu, G., Malinow, R., and Cline, H. T. (1996). Maturation of a central glutamatergic synapse. Science 274, 972-976.
48. Zhang, L. I., Tao, H. W., Holt, C. E., Harris, W. A., and Poo, M. M. (1998). A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses. Nature 395, 37-44.
49. Zhang, L. I., Tao, H. W., and Poo, M. (2000). Visual input induces long-term potentiation of developing retinotectal synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 708-715.
50. Zhou, Q., Tao, H. W., and Poo, M. M. (2003) Reversal and stabilization of synaptic modifications in a developing visual system. Science 300, 1953-1957.