Expected taste intensity affects response to sweet drinks in primary taste cortex

NeuroReport

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 365-369

  Woods, Andrew T ^a,b   Lloyd, Donna M ^b   Kuenzel, Johanna ^a,b   Poliakoff, Ellen ^b   Dijksterhuis, Garmt B ^a   Thomas, Anna ^a  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Expectation; functional MRI; insula; meta analysis; sweetness; taste

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; BRAIN CORTEX; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GUSTATORY SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWEETNESS; TASTE ACUITY;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; TASTE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955639529     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283469581     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Spence C, Levitan CA, Shankar MU, Zampini M. Does food colour influence food perception in humans? Chemosens Percept 2010; 3:68-84.
2. Zampini M, Sanabria D, Phillips N, Spence C. The multisensory perception of flavor: Assessing the influence of color cues on flavor discrimination responses. Food Qual Prefer 2007; 18:975-984. (Pubitemid 47022918)
3. Bender G, Veldhuizen MG, Meltzer JA, Gitelman DR, Small DM. Neural correlates of evaluative compared with passive tasting. Eur J Neurosci 2009; 30:327-338.
4. McCabe C, Rolls ET. Umami: A delicious flavor formed by convergence of taste and olfactory pathways in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 2007; 25:1855-1864. (Pubitemid 46550014)
5. Grabenhorst F, Rolls ET, Bilderbeck A. How cognition modulates affective responses to taste and flavor: Top-down influences on the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortices. Cerebral Cortex 2007; 18:1549-1559. (Pubitemid 351882033)
6. Grabenhorst F, Rolls ET. Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes taste stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 2008; 27:723-729. (Pubitemid 351239290)
7. Small DM, Gregory MD, Mak YE, Gitelman D, Mesulam MM, Parrish T. Dissociation of neural representation of intensity and affective valuation in human gustation. Neuron 2003; 39:701-711. (Pubitemid 36993586)
8. Nitschke JB, Dixon GE, Sarinopoulos I, Short SJ, Cohen JD, Smith EE, et al. Altering expectancy dampens neural response to aversive taste in primary taste cortex. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9:435-442. (Pubitemid 43290974)
9. Jabbi M, Bastiaansen J, Keysers C. A common anterior insula representation of disgust observation, experience and imagination shows divergent functional connectivity pathways. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2939.
10. O'Doherty J, Rolls ET, Francis S, Bowtell R, McGlone F. Representation of pleasant and aversive taste in the human brain. J Neurophysiol 2001; 85:1315-1321. (Pubitemid 32209617)
11. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002; 17:825-841. (Pubitemid 35317016)
12. Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 17:143-155. (Pubitemid 35253488)
13. Worsley KJ. Statistical analysis of activation images. In: Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Smith SM, editors. Functional MRI: An introduction to methods. Chippenham: Antony Rowe Ltd; 2001.
14. Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM. General multilevel linear modelling for group analysis in FMRI. Neuroimage 2003; 20:1052-1063. (Pubitemid 37268124)
15. Woolrich MW. Robust group analysis using outlier inference. Neuroimage 2008; 41:286-301.
16. Woolrich MW, Behrens TEJ, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM. Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage 2004; 21:1732-1747. (Pubitemid 38446594)
17. Jenkinson M, Smith SM. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 2001; 5:143-156. (Pubitemid 35282800)
18. Frank GK, Oberndorfer TA, Simmons AN, Paulus MP, Fudge JL, Yang TT, Kaye WH. Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener. Neuroimage 2008; 39:1559-1569.
19. Woods AT, Poliakoff E, Lloyd DM, Dijksterhuis GB, Thomas A. Flavor expectation: The effect of assuming homogeneity on drink perception. Chemos Percept 2010; 3:174-181.
20. Schoenfeld MA, Neuer G, Tempelmann C, SchüXler K, Noesselt T, Hopf JM, et al. Functional magnetic resonance tomography correlates of taste perception in the human primary taste cortex. Neuroscience 2004; 127:347-353. (Pubitemid 38950650)
21. Kringelbach ML. The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6:691-702. (Pubitemid 43160318)
22. De Araujo IE, Rolls ET, Velazco MI, Margot C, Cayeux I. Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing. Neuron 2005; 46:671-679. (Pubitemid 40797390)
23. McClure SM, Li J, Tomlin D, Cypert KS, Montague LM, Montague PR. Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron 2004; 44:379-387. (Pubitemid 39346259)
24. Miller BT, Vytlacil J, Fegen D, Pradhan S, D'Esposito M. The prefrontal cortex modulates category selectivity in human extrastriate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23:1-10.
25. Wager TD, Rilling JK, Smith EE, Sokolik A, Casey KL, Davidson RJ, et al. Placebo-induced changes in fMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science 2004; 303:1162-1167. (Pubitemid 38233575)