Perceived barriers to guidelines in peritoneal dialysis

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1683-1689

  Allen, Nathan ^a   Schwartz, Daniel ^b   Sood, Amy R ^a   Mendelssohn, David ^c   Verrelli, Mauro ^a   Tanna, Gemini ^c   Schiff, Jeff ^c   Komenda, Paul ^a   Rigatto, Claudio ^a   Sood, Manish M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

evidence based medicine; peritoneal dialysis; practice guidelines; survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; NEPHROLOGIST; NEPHROLOGY; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WORK EXPERIENCE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 79955626637     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq623     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-1465 (Pubitemid 29493800)
2. Wald R, Tentori F, Tighiouart H et al. Impact of Kidney Disease Out-come Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bone and Mineral Metabolism and Disease in a large dialysis net-work. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49: 257-266 (Pubitemid 46178400)
3. Ackad A, Simonian GT, Steel K et al. A journey in reversing practice patterns: a multidisciplinary experience in implementing KDOQI guidelines for vascular access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: 1450-1455 (Pubitemid 41430620)
4. Collins AJ, Roberts TL, St Peter WL et al. United States Renal Data System assessment of the impact of the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: 784-795 (Pubitemid 34263353)
5. 2009 Annual Report of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study: Hemodialysis Data 1999-2008. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI
6. Ronald LP, Charlotte JA, Justin MA et al. Facility hemodialysis vascular access use and mortality in countries participating in DOPPS: an instrumental variable analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: 475-491
7. Lopes AA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Ramirez SPB et al. Prescription of antihypertensive agents to haemodialysis patients: time trends and as-sociations with patient characteristics, country and survival in the DOPPS. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 2809-2816
8. Jean ÃT, Jennifer LB-G, Luis P et al. Aspirin prescription and out-comes in hemodialysis patients: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am JKidney Dis 2007; 50: 602-611
9. Hasegawa T, Bragg-Gresham JL, Yamazaki S et al. Greater first-year survival on hemodialysis in facilities in which patients are provided earlier and more frequent pre-nephrology visits. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 595-602
10. Johnson D, Brown F, Lammi H et al. The CARI guidelines. Dia-lysis adequacy (PD) guidelines. Nephrology (Carlton) 2005; 10: S81-S107
11. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for 2006 Updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48: S1-S322
12. Dombros N, Dratwa M, Feriani M et al. European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. 7 Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: ix24-ix27
13. Cost of applying the K/DOQI guidelines for bone metabolism and disease to a cohort of chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2007; 71: 312-317
14. Mendelssohn DC Musings on guidelines and evidence: a pragmatic and nephrocentric view. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27: 31-34
15. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Cinacalcet for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with end-stage renal disease on maintenance dialysis therapy. NICE technology appraisal guidance. January 2007. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11608/33858/33858.doc (August 2010, date last accessed).
16. Irving MJ, Tong A, Rychetnik L et al. Nephrologists' perspectives on the effect of guidelines on clinical practice: a semistructured inter-view study Am JKidney Dis 2010; 55: 241-249
17. Gejyo F, Saito A, Akizawa T et al. 2004 Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy guidelines for renal anemia in chronic hemodialysis patients. Ther Apher Dial 2004; 8: 443-459
18. Hirasawa Y, Suzuki M, Itami N et al. Maintenance hematocrit levels and mortality in hemodialysis patients with renal anemia receiving recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment (rHuEPO survey). J Jpn Soc Dial Ther 2003; 36: 1265-1272
19. Mujais S, Story K. Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of out-comes in contemporary cohorts. Kidney Int 70: S21-S26
20. Schaubel DE, Blake PG, Fenton SSA. Effect ofrenal center charac-teristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1517-1524 (Pubitemid 32960047)
21. Huisman RM, Nieuwenhuizen MGM, de Charro FT Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of periton-eal dialysis in the Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 1655-1660 (Pubitemid 35012170)
22. Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJS et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interven-tion). American College of Cardiology Web Site. http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/percutaneous/update/index.pdf (August 2010, date last accessed)
23. Hannan EL, Racz M, Ryan TJ et al. Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA 1997; 277: 892-898 (Pubitemid 27123949)
24. Ellis SG, Weintraub W, Holmes D et al. Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary re-vascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes. Circulation 1997; 95: 2479-2484 (Pubitemid 27233112)
25. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Laskey WK. The relationship between coron-ary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications. JAMA 1995; 274: 1137-1142
26. Irving MJ, Johnson DW, McDonald S et al. Opinions on the content and effects of clinical practice guidelines for CKD: a survey of ne-phrologists in Australia and New Zealand. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: 1082-1090
27. Sammer CE, Lykens K, Singh KP. Physician characteristics and the reported effect of evidence-based practice guidelines. Health Serv Res 2008; 43: 569-581 (Pubitemid 351442591)
28. Yabroff KR, Saraiya M, Meissner HI et al. Specialty differences in pri-mary care physician reports of Papanicolaou test screening practices: a national survey, 2006 to 2007. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 602-611
29. Barritt ASIV, Arguedas MR. Practice patterns in screening for vari-ces: an American survey. Dig Liver Dis 2009; 41: 676-682
30. Jones D, Curry W. Impact of a PDA-based diabetes electronic man-agement system in a primary care office. Am J Med Qual 2006; 21: 401-407 (Pubitemid 44673174)
31. Price M. Can hand-held computers improve adherence to guidelines? A (Palm) Pilot study of family doctors in British Columbia. Can Fam Physician 2005; 51: 1506-1507
32. Bertoni AG, Bonds DE, Chen H et al. Impact of a multifaceted inter-vention on cholesterol management in primary care practices: guide-line adherence for heart health randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 678-686
33. Locatelli F, Covic A, Macdougall IC et al. Effect of computer-assisted European Best Practice Guideline implementation on adherence and target attainment: ORAMA results. JNephrol 2009; 22: 662-674