Impact of a PDA-based diabetes electronic management system in a primary care office

American Journal of Medical Quality

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 401-407

  Jones, Dallon ^a   Curry, William ^a,b  

^a PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guidelines; Computers; Diabetes mellitus; Handheld utilization; Practice guidelines

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 33750567550     PISSN: 10628606     EISSN: 1555824X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1062860606293594     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ford E, Williamson DF, Liu S. Weight change and diabetes incidence: findings from a national cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:214-222.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Surveillance, 1997. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1997.
3. Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in 1997, American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:296-309.
4. Saaddine JB, Engelgau MM, Beckles GL, et al. A diabetes report card for the United States: Quality of care in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:565-574.
5. McGlynn E, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635-2645.
6. Eytan TA, Goldberg HI. How effective is the computer-based clinical practice guideline? Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:24-33.
7. Cook DJ, Greengold NL, Ellrodt AG, Weingarten SR. The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:210-216.
8. Lohr KN. Guidelines for clinical practice: applications for primary care. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994;6:17-25.
9. Fischer S, Stewart TE, Mehta S, Wax R, Lapinsky SE. Handheld Computing in Medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:139-149.
10. Spero M, Kenet A, Porter B. Computer-prompted diabetes care. Effective Clinical Practice. October/November 1998:1:90-92.
11. Curry WJ, Shaeffer G, Brian J. Impact of a PDA-based diabetic electronic management system in a primary care office. Paper presented at: North American Research Group, October 2004, Orlando, Fla.
12. Kirkman M, Williams SR, Caffrey HH, Marrero DG. Impact of a program to improve adherence to diabetes guidelines by primary care physicians. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1946-1951.
13. Hirsch IB. The burden of diabetes (care). Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1613-1614.
14. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:213-229.
15. O'Connor PJ, Crain AL, Rush WA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Gutenkauf JJ, Duncan JE. Impact of an electronic medical record on diabetes quality of care. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:300-306.