Simultaneous Contrast: Evidence From Licking Microstructure and Cross-Solution Comparisons

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 200-210

  Dwyer, Dominic M ^a   Lydall, Emma S ^a   Hayward, Andrew J ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flavor; Licking; Microstructure; Palatability; Preference

Indexed keywords

MALTODEXTRIN; POLYSACCHARIDE; SWEETENING AGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; DOSE RESPONSE; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; DRUG EFFECT; FOOD PREFERENCE; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT; TASTE;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FOOD PREFERENCES; MALE; POLYSACCHARIDES; RATS; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE;

RATTUS;

EID: 79955580465     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021458     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 1954, 61:183-193.
2. Barlow H.B. The coding of sensory messages. Current problems in animal behaviour 1961, 331-361. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. S.J. Thorpe, O.L. Zangwill (Eds.).
3. Bartoshuk L.A. Water taste in man. Perception & Psychophysics 1968, 3:69-72.
4. Davis J.D. Deterministic and probabilistic control of the behavior of rats ingesting liquid diets. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology 1996, 39:R793-R800.
5. Davis J.D. Microstructural analysis of the ingestive behavior of the rat ingesting polycose. Physiology & Behavior 1996, 60:1557-1563.
6. Davis J.D. A model for the control of ingestion: 20 years later. Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology 1998, 17:127-173. Academic Press, San Diego. A.R. Morrison, S.J. Fluharty (Eds.).
7. Davis J.D., Collins B.J., Levine M.W. Peripheral control of drinking: Gastrointestinal filling as a negative feedback signal, a theoretical and experimental analysis. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1975, 89:985-1002.
8. Davis J.D., Levine M.W. Model for control of ingestion. Psychological Review 1977, 84:379-412.
9. Davis J.D., Perez M.C. Food deprivation-induced and palatability-induced microstructural changes in ingestive behavior. American Journal of Physiology 1993, 264:R97-R103.
10. Davis J.D., Smith G.P. Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions. Behavioral Neuroscience 1992, 106:217-228.
11. Dwyer D.M. Microstructural analysis of conditioned and unconditioned responses to maltodextrin. Learning & Behavior 2008, 36:149-158.
12. Dwyer D.M. Microstructural analysis of ingestive behaviour reveals no contribution of palatability to the incomplete extinction of a conditioned taste aversion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:9-17.
13. Dwyer D.M., Boakes R.A., Hayward A.J. Reduced palatability in lithium- and activity-based, but not in amphetamine-based, taste aversion learning. Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, 122:1051-1060.
14. Dwyer D.M., Pincham H.L., Thein T., Harris J.A. A learned flavor preference persists despite the extinction of conditioned hedonic reactions to the cue flavors. Learning & Behavior 2009, 37:305-310.
15. Ernits T., Corbit J.D. Taste as a dipsogenic stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1973, 83:27-31.
16. Fagen J.W., Rycek R.F., Ritz E.G., Shoemaker G.E. Effect of varying sucrose concentration on macrobehavioral aspects of licking in the rat. Journal of General Psychology 1983, 109:181-187.
17. Flaherty C.F. Incentive contrast: A review of behavioral-changes following shifts in reward. Animal Learning & Behavior 1982, 10:409-440.
18. Flaherty C.F. Incentive contrast and selected animal models of anxiety. Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion and cognition 1991, 207-243. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L.D.C.F. Flaherty (Ed.).
19. Flaherty C.F. Incentive relativity 1996, Cambridge University Press, New York.
20. Flaherty C.F., Avdzej A. Bidirectional contrast as a function of rate of alternation of two sucrose solutions. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1974, 4(5-B):505-507.
21. Flaherty C.F., Becker H.C., Driscoll C. Conditions under which amobarbital sodium influences contrast in consummatory behavior. Physiological Psychology 1982, 10:122-128.
22. Flaherty C.F., Kaplan P.S. Gustatory contrast in rats. Chemical Senses & Flavour 1979, 4:63-72.
23. Flaherty C.F., Largen J. Within-subjects positive and negative contrast effects in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1975, 88:653-664.
24. Flaherty C.F., Lombardi B.R., Kapust J., D'Amato M.R. Incentive contrast undiminished by extended testing, imipramine, or chlordiazepoxide. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 1977, 7:315-322.
25. Flaherty C.F., Meinrath A.B. The influence of scopolamine on sucrose intake under absolute and relative test conditions. Physiological Psychology 1979, 7:412-418.
26. Flaherty C.F., Rowan G.A. Successive, simultaneous, and anticipatory contrast in the consumption of saccharin solutions. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Behavior Processes 1986, 12:381-393.
27. Flaherty C.F., Sepanak S.J. Bidirectional contrast, matching, and power functions obtained in sucrose consumption by rats. Animal Learning & Behavior 1978, 6:313-319.
28. Flaherty C.F., Wrightson J., Deptula D., Duston C. Chlordiazepoxide does not influence simultaneous gustatory contrast. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1979, 14:216-218.
29. Grigson P.S., Kaplan J.M., Roitman M.F., Norgren R., Grill H.J. Reward comparison in chronic decerebrate rats. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology 1997, 273:R479-R486.
30. Grigson P.S., Norgren R. Medullary taste neurons encode the relative properties of sapid stimuli. Appetite 1993, 21:180.
31. Groves P.M., Thompson R.F. Habituation: A dual-process theory. Psychological Review 1970, 77:419-450.
32. Hsiao S., Fan R.J. Additivity of taste-specific effects of sucrose and quinine: Microstructural analysis of ingestive behavior in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience 1993, 107:317-326.
33. Kohler M., Wallach H. Figural aftereffects: An investigation of visual processes. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1944, 88:269-357.
34. Lydall E.S., Gilmour G., Dwyer D.M. Analysis of licking microstructure provides no evidence for a reduction in reward value following acute or sub-chronic phencyclidine administration. Psychopharmacology 2010, 209:153-162.
35. Lydall E.S., Gilmour G., Dwyer D.M. Rats place greater value on rewards produced by high effort: An animal analogue of the " effort justification" effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:1134-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.011.
36. McBurney D.H. Gustatory cross adaptation between sweet-tasting compounds. Perception & Psychophysics 1972, 11:225-227.
37. Moskowitz H.R. Ratio scales of sugar sweetness. Perception & Psychophysics 1970, 7:315-320.
38. Nissenbaum J.W., Sclafani A. Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: A 2-carbohydrate taste model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 1987, 11:187-196.
39. Papini M.R., Pellegrini S. Scaling relative incentive value in consummatory behavior. Learning and Motivation 2006, 37:357-378.
40. Reilly S., Bornovalova M., Trifunovic R. Excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus spare simultaneous contrast effects but eliminate anticipatory negative contrast: Evidence against a memory deficit. Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 118:365-376.
41. Reilly S., Pritchard T.C. Gustatory thalamus lesions in the rat. 3. Simultaneous contrast and autoshaping. Physiology & Behavior 1997, 62:1355-1363.
42. Sclafani A. Carbohydrate taste, appetite, and obesity: An overview. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 1987, 11:131-153.
43. Sclafani A. The sixth taste?. Appetite 2004, 43:1-3.
44. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Deprivation alters rats flavor preferences for carbohydrates and fats. Physiology & Behavior 1993, 53:1091-1099.
45. Sclafani A., Mann S. Carbohydrate taste preferences in rats: Glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose and polycose compared. Physiology & Behavior 1987, 40:563-568.
46. Spector A.C., Klumpp P.A., Kaplan J.M. Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat. Behavioral Neuroscience 1998, 112:678-694.
47. Spector A.C., St John S.J. Role of taste in the microstructure of quinine ingestion by rats. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology 1998, 274:1687-1703.
48. Stevens S.S. Sensory scales of taste intensity. Perception & Psychophysics 1969, 6:302-307.
49. Sutherland N.S. Figural after-effects and apparent size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1961, 13:222-228.